Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. $3000 per child economic stimulus

$3000 per child economic stimulus

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
46 Posts 14 Posters 479 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

    @89th I'm fine with a flat tax, but every time I look into the definition of "what you make" should be, it looks impossible to implement.

    Related: A fun thing I like to try to puzzle out all the time, because I find it impossible, is the inequality Pareto curve. The more you get the more you get, and the less you have the less you have. The stupid rich have more and more of the total share of wealth in every Western country with each passing decade. And it's a fact that no matter how fair you think the system is, once enough people at the bottom feel like the system is no longer fair to them, they flip the board and people get shot or hung regardless.

    To be clear, I have no idea what the answer to that should be. "Take more money from rich people" is a non-solution. UBI would create a nightmare. But the fact remains that the degree of inequality is directly tied to the degree of violent crime. Saying that shouldn't be so doesn't fix it and every solution, including do nothing, seems destined to fail.

    On the lighter side of things, I recently learned that wombats poop cubes.

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote on last edited by
    #34

    @aqua-letifer said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

    @89th I'm fine with a flat tax, but every time I look into the definition of "what you make" should be, it looks impossible to implement.

    Related: A fun thing I like to try to puzzle out all the time, because I find it impossible, is the inequality Pareto curve. The more you get the more you get, and the less you have the less you have. The stupid rich have more and more of the total share of wealth in every Western country with each passing decade. And it's a fact that no matter how fair you think the system is, once enough people at the bottom feel like the system is no longer fair to them, they flip the board and people get shot or hung regardless.

    To be clear, I have no idea what the answer to that should be. "Take more money from rich people" is a non-solution. UBI would create a nightmare. But the fact remains that the degree of inequality is directly tied to the degree of violent crime. Saying that shouldn't be so doesn't fix it and every solution, including do nothing, seems destined to fail.

    On the lighter side of things, I recently learned that wombats poop cubes.

    LOL - and good post/reply. Good chit.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

      @89th I'm fine with a flat tax, but every time I look into the definition of "what you make" should be, it looks impossible to implement.

      Related: A fun thing I like to try to puzzle out all the time, because I find it impossible, is the inequality Pareto curve. The more you get the more you get, and the less you have the less you have. The stupid rich have more and more of the total share of wealth in every Western country with each passing decade. And it's a fact that no matter how fair you think the system is, once enough people at the bottom feel like the system is no longer fair to them, they flip the board and people get shot or hung regardless.

      To be clear, I have no idea what the answer to that should be. "Take more money from rich people" is a non-solution. UBI would create a nightmare. But the fact remains that the degree of inequality is directly tied to the degree of violent crime. Saying that shouldn't be so doesn't fix it and every solution, including do nothing, seems destined to fail.

      On the lighter side of things, I recently learned that wombats poop cubes.

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #35

      @aqua-letifer said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

      The more you get the more you get, and the less you have the less you have.

      Yup. If you have $1 million, and get a 5% return on that, you are still getting a lot of money $50,000.

      If you have $10,000, get a 10% return, you only have $1000 extra.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #36

        That’s why Horace is flying all of us to Napa for TNCRs 20th reunion in 2025

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          That’s why Horace is flying all of us to Napa for TNCRs 20th reunion in 2025

          HoraceH Online
          HoraceH Online
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #37

          @jon-nyc said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

          That’s why Horace is flying all of us to Napa for TNCRs 20th reunion in 2025

          Right, first class. Don't forget about the covered calls.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            @lufins-dad said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

            It's an increase of $1000 per year. $1000 per year will lift 4.1 million children out of poverty? Color me skeptical.

            Sorta passes the sniff test. The poverty line is a discrete number for a family of a given size.

            Look at family of four for example, poverty line is 24k (says google). It makes sense that the number of households making within 23k-24k would be large, probably measuring in the single-digit millions. Then repeat that exercise for families of 2 and 3... and you could see it add up.

            Its just that 'lifting you out of poverty' has a life-transforming ring to it, whereas in reality, for a family of 4, going from 23.5k to 24.5k is welcome, but hardly game changing.

            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins DadL Offline
            LuFins Dad
            wrote on last edited by
            #38

            @jon-nyc said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

            @lufins-dad said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

            It's an increase of $1000 per year. $1000 per year will lift 4.1 million children out of poverty? Color me skeptical.

            Sorta passes the sniff test. The poverty line is a discrete number for a family of a given size.

            Look at family of four for example, poverty line is 24k (says google). It makes sense that the number of households making within 23k-24k would be large, probably measuring in the single-digit millions. Then repeat that exercise for families of 2 and 3... and you could see it add up.

            Its just that 'lifting you out of poverty' has a life-transforming ring to it, whereas in reality, for a family of 4, going from 23.5k to 24.5k is welcome, but hardly game changing.

            Technically, isn’t it a tax credit and wouldn’t count as income? That would mean their income would stay the same and they wouldn’t cross the poverty threshold ...

            If it does count as income, great... Now think of the families of 4 making $32k that now are making $34K (assuming 2 kids). This puts them over the limit for school meal programs... It will also push millions of families over the income eligibility levels for HUD, WIC, Social Security, DC School Choice, Pell Grants, Need based scholarships and thousands of other programs... The only reasonable response will be to raise the poverty line...Putting those 4.1 Million back in poverty.

            The Brad

            1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by Axtremus
              #39

              https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/17/biden-child-tax-benefit/

              Child cash benefit will begin hitting millions of parents’ bank accounts July 15
              
Administration estimates 88 percent of all American children are slated to receive new monthly payments -- with no action required

              $300 per child under 6 and up to $250 per child over 6. Like the earlier stimulus payment, there is a means-tested cutoff at around the $75k(individual)/$150k(couple) income level.

              Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
              • 89th8 89th

                My wife and I have done well the last few years in terms of income. Not Horace-level, but still pretty good and I recognize we are fortunate to have the employment we do.

                While I understand the concept of phasing out all of these stimulus checks once you exceed a certain household income... the one-two punch of us paying a higher % of our income to the IRS than our neighbors and also not getting any of the distribution of cash back really is a weird and disappointing feeling. Disheartening? Unmotivating? Not sure the adjective.

                brendaB Offline
                brendaB Offline
                brenda
                wrote on last edited by brenda
                #40

                @89th said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                My wife and I have done well the last few years in terms of income. Not Horace-level, but still pretty good and I recognize we are fortunate to have the employment we do.

                While I understand the concept of phasing out all of these stimulus checks once you exceed a certain household income... the one-two punch of us paying a higher % of our income to the IRS than our neighbors and also not getting any of the distribution of cash back really is a weird and disappointing feeling. Disheartening? Unmotivating? Not sure the adjective.

                Not to worry, 89th, you'll still be participating in the stimulus package, just not as a recipient. You might get the t-shirt:
                "Stimulus 2021 'donor'.
                You're welcome."

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Axtremus

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/17/biden-child-tax-benefit/

                  Child cash benefit will begin hitting millions of parents’ bank accounts July 15
                  
Administration estimates 88 percent of all American children are slated to receive new monthly payments -- with no action required

                  $300 per child under 6 and up to $250 per child over 6. Like the earlier stimulus payment, there is a means-tested cutoff at around the $75k(individual)/$150k(couple) income level.

                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                  Aqua LetiferA Offline
                  Aqua Letifer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #41

                  @axtremus said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                  https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/17/biden-child-tax-benefit/

                  Child cash benefit will begin hitting millions of parents’ bank accounts July 15
                  
Administration estimates 88 percent of all American children are slated to receive new monthly payments -- with no action required

                  $300 per child under 6 and up to $250 per child over 6. Like the earlier stimulus payment, there is a means-tested cutoff at around the $75k(individual)/$150k(couple) income level.

                  They should submit the money by way of a digital account so that they can track how the money's being spent. I'd love to know that.

                  Please love yourself.

                  HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                  • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                    @axtremus said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/17/biden-child-tax-benefit/

                    Child cash benefit will begin hitting millions of parents’ bank accounts July 15
                    
Administration estimates 88 percent of all American children are slated to receive new monthly payments -- with no action required

                    $300 per child under 6 and up to $250 per child over 6. Like the earlier stimulus payment, there is a means-tested cutoff at around the $75k(individual)/$150k(couple) income level.

                    They should submit the money by way of a digital account so that they can track how the money's being spent. I'd love to know that.

                    HoraceH Online
                    HoraceH Online
                    Horace
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #42

                    @aqua-letifer said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                    @axtremus said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                    https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2021/05/17/biden-child-tax-benefit/

                    Child cash benefit will begin hitting millions of parents’ bank accounts July 15
                    
Administration estimates 88 percent of all American children are slated to receive new monthly payments -- with no action required

                    $300 per child under 6 and up to $250 per child over 6. Like the earlier stimulus payment, there is a means-tested cutoff at around the $75k(individual)/$150k(couple) income level.

                    They should submit the money by way of a digital account so that they can track how the money's being spent. I'd love to know that.

                    conscientiously saved for the child's college education, in most cases.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #43

                      12 years old is not too young for hookers and blow.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins DadL Offline
                        LuFins Dad
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #44

                        Time for Karla and I to go away for a weekend... Daddy needs a new Benz...

                        The Brad

                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                          Time for Karla and I to go away for a weekend... Daddy needs a new Benz...

                          George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #45

                          @lufins-dad said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                          Time for Karla and I to go away for a weekend... Daddy needs a new Benz...

                          https://www.truecar.com/mercedes-benz/c-class/lease/

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG George K

                            @lufins-dad said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                            Time for Karla and I to go away for a weekend... Daddy needs a new Benz...

                            https://www.truecar.com/mercedes-benz/c-class/lease/

                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins DadL Offline
                            LuFins Dad
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #46

                            @george-k said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                            @lufins-dad said in $3000 per child economic stimulus:

                            Time for Karla and I to go away for a weekend... Daddy needs a new Benz...

                            https://www.truecar.com/mercedes-benz/c-class/lease/

                            $300 + $300 = 🚘

                            The Brad

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • Users
                            • Groups