Stroke?
-
That may or may not be true.
One this that is true: We don't know the results of the autopsy.
Why?
-
wrote on 24 Feb 2021, 17:14 last edited by
If it was a stroke the literature suggests 10 risk factors of which stress is only one. So one would assume extreme stress triggered the stroke but do we know if a stroke at some near term point was likely to happen if the 9 other risk factors weren’t actively mitigated?
-
wrote on 24 Feb 2021, 17:20 last edited by
Some TDS crocodile tears are going to have to be re-absorbed into TDS eyes. That's gonna sting.
-
If it was a stroke the literature suggests 10 risk factors of which stress is only one. So one would assume extreme stress triggered the stroke but do we know if a stroke at some near term point was likely to happen if the 9 other risk factors weren’t actively mitigated?
wrote on 24 Feb 2021, 20:44 last edited byIf it was a stroke the literature suggests 10 risk factors of which stress is only one. So one would assume extreme stress triggered the stroke but do we know if a stroke at some near term point was likely to happen if the 9 other risk factors weren’t actively mitigated?
Crawling out on a medical limb...the hormone dump of extreme stress most likely causes tachycardia and high blood pressure, causing extra pressure to be put on an arterial wall in the brain?
-
If it was a stroke the literature suggests 10 risk factors of which stress is only one. So one would assume extreme stress triggered the stroke but do we know if a stroke at some near term point was likely to happen if the 9 other risk factors weren’t actively mitigated?
Crawling out on a medical limb...the hormone dump of extreme stress most likely causes tachycardia and high blood pressure, causing extra pressure to be put on an arterial wall in the brain?
wrote on 24 Feb 2021, 23:23 last edited byCrawling out on a medical limb...the hormone dump of extreme stress most likely causes tachycardia and high blood pressure, causing extra pressure to be put on an arterial wall in the brain?
No question that a hypertensive crisis can cause a hemorrhagic stroke. But usually that's in older patients. I have no idea what Officer Sicknick's medical history is, but what you mention is possible. On a scale of likely (1-10), I'd give it about a 2, unless he popped a berry aneurysm.
But, it's all speculation without the autopsy, right?
-
wrote on 24 Feb 2021, 23:50 last edited by
What autopsy?
-
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 19:38 last edited by
So. Has anybody retracted their “beaten to death with a fire extinguisher” statements yet?
-
So. Has anybody retracted their “beaten to death with a fire extinguisher” statements yet?
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 19:41 last edited by@lufins-dad said in Stroke?:
So. Has anybody retracted their “beaten to death with a fire extinguisher” statements yet?
No.
-
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 19:45 last edited by
I can provide links if anybody needs. Then they can make any retractions they feel is appropriate.
-
I can provide links if anybody needs. Then they can make any retractions they feel is appropriate.
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 19:55 last edited by@lufins-dad said in Stroke?:
I can provide links if anybody needs. Then they can make any retractions they feel is appropriate.
Don't hold your breath.
-
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 21:07 last edited by
I’m not sure ‘the blow from the fire hydrant wasn’t what actually killed him’ is quite as exculpatory as some of you seem to think.
-
I’m not sure ‘the blow from the fire hydrant wasn’t what actually killed him’ is quite as exculpatory as some of you seem to think.
-
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 22:13 last edited by
Who’s we? TNCR or investigators? As for the former I think all we know is that it was described by witnesses.
-
I’m not sure ‘the blow from the fire hydrant wasn’t what actually killed him’ is quite as exculpatory as some of you seem to think.
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 22:17 last edited by -
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 22:18 last edited by
Ha
-
I’m not sure ‘the blow from the fire hydrant wasn’t what actually killed him’ is quite as exculpatory as some of you seem to think.
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 22:33 last edited byI’m not sure ‘the blow from the fire hydrant wasn’t what actually killed him’ is quite as exculpatory as some of you seem to think.
I'd say no blunt force trauma is pretty fucking exculpatory.
https://www.cnn.com/2021/02/02/politics/brian-sicknick-charges/index.html -
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 23:08 last edited by
I watched the video that showed the extinguisher hit the policemen.
What I saw wasn't enough to injure a healthy adult man.
It wasn't quite a glancing blow, more of a touch.
-
wrote on 25 Feb 2021, 23:09 last edited by
Investigators have determined any fire extinguisher episode is not relevant to his death . They said it is not true.
Now they are looking at bear spray. I heard it might not even be him who was hit.
How’s that for corroborated reporting at the time?