Nashville Bombing
-
It was a trap to draw in policemen and kill them, in my opinion. It was not the bombers intent to kill civilians, which is why it was set for that early in the morning. There was a recording that started playing from the RV telling people to evacuate because the RV was set to explode. Whoever did it wanted to get civilians to run away, and police to run to, the RV.
-
-
WTF did they have in that thing?
@lufins-dad said in In Nashville this AM:
WTF did they have in that thing?
I don't know, but it sure packed a punch, didn't it....
-
@jodi said in In Nashville this AM:
This is horrible. WTF.
Some of those people have occasional bad behavior, but they wouldn't do this.
Not on Christmas anyway.
-
@mark said in In Nashville this AM:
VBIED? Very Bad Improvised Explosive Device? lol
WTF is VB?
Vehicle-borne Improvised Explosive Device.
Presumably it's American for car-bomb.
-
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
He mentions the 1996 IRA bombing of Manchester as having similarities - they frequently used to call in warnings ahead of time, and sometimes actually used code words so the police would know which warnings were genuine. The goal was to cause as much chaos and material damage as possible, but preferably without killing anybody.
-
Fascinating. (Horrifying too). Off topic about twitter - I really only read it when it’s linked to here, and I find I’m much more likely to keep reading without my mind drifting off somewhere else when things are broken into chunks like that, even though there were a lot of them, than I would if it were all presented together on one page. (I tend to skim, then) Pretty sure technology has rewired my brain...
-
@george-k said in In Nashville this AM:
Former federal prosecutor weighs in on what's unusual and speculates on motive
Read the tread:Thanks for posting this, George. Despite the captain-obviousness of most of his post, I appreciated learning of his reasoning.
-
@george-k said in In Nashville this AM:
Former federal prosecutor weighs in on what's unusual and speculates on motive
Read the tread:
Great read as Jodi mentioned. I also like the chunking of info, I was think about the thought process in how the 36 tweets are written.
Of course it addresses the “why” which nothing else does so far.
-
https://www.facebook.com/photo...et=a.100840766618002
"The explosion took out a single commercial communications hub.
And THAT crippled the city. It took down the airport. Took down emergency services and police communications. Took down data and the internet, which crippled news, information services, social media, and thus both government and the public's awareness and ability to respond.
And yet, the terrorists took pains to reduce the number of human casualties. Why?
Unless this is a Bruce Willis Christmas movie involving international criminals covering up the theft of billions in bearer bonds, then the odds are very high this was a probing attack -- a test by our enemies foreign OR domestic.
This used to be my job. Cut a critical comms node, see what effect it has on the target, how long it takes to restore, how the adversary responds. Of course, that was war.
This is either something similar, or the terrorists got incredibly lucky."*
