Voteflake
-
Should be easy to prove, Larry. Just show us the court filing.
Show me the court case that has allowed any evidence to be presented.
A week ago Sunday, the very most recent court that Team Trump appeared in. We have a thread about it here.
Ah... the one where a never Trumper writing an article in a never Trumper website tells how the court refused to hear the case....
Without hearing any evidence......
That's the best you've got?
-
Honestly Larry you've really beclowned yourself this last month. You've become someone to feel sorry for.
I say that with full knowledge that you'll find it condescending. But sometimes friends need to sit you down and tell it like it is.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
Honestly Larry you've really beclowned yourself this last month. You've become someone to feel sorry for.
I say that with full knowledge that you'll find it condescending. But sometimes friends need to sit you down and tell it like it is.
Im in good company. Nearly 80 million people of voting age agree with me, and think you are the clown. Apparently the only time those who agree with you can put together a group larger than 20 people however, is when youre voting....
-
Honestly Larry you've really beclowned yourself this last month. You've become someone to feel sorry for.
I say that with full knowledge that you'll find it condescending. But sometimes friends need to sit you down and tell it like it is.
Honestly Larry you've really beclowned yourself this last month. You've become someone to feel sorry for.
I say that with full knowledge that you'll find it condescending. But sometimes friends need to sit you down and tell it like it is.
Jon - this lacks a sense of self awareness.
-
I’m fully aware that I revel in his losses and spike the ball here every time he re-loses, if that’s what you’re referring to.
However, I am also aware of the content of the cases he brings and everything I've said to Larry is true and defensible.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
I’m fully aware that I revel in his losses and spike the ball here every time he re-loses, if that’s what you’re referring to.
However, I am also aware of the content of the cases he brings and everything I've said to Larry is true and defensible.
I’m fully aware that I revel in his losses and spike the ball here every time he re-loses, if that’s what you’re referring to.
I am, however, aware of the content of the cases he brings and everything I've said to Larry is true and defensible.
That's just it - I haven't lost a thing. And you've yet to say anything "true and defensible" without relying on the lies being told by the media.
-
I’m fully aware that I revel in his losses and spike the ball here every time he re-loses, if that’s what you’re referring to.
However, I am also aware of the content of the cases he brings and everything I've said to Larry is true and defensible.
I’m fully aware that I revel in his losses and spike the ball here every time he re-loses, if that’s what you’re referring to.
However, I am also aware of the content of the cases he brings and everything I've said to Larry is true and defensible.
At some point, being an insufferable ass will leave you in a room talking to yourself.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
I'm comfortable with my position on this issue. After all, the very ones telling us Biden won are the very same ones who told us Trump was a Russian spy, that he called for a "Muslim ban", that he was a racist, that he called all Mexicans criminals and rapists,... they're the very same ones who accused Kavanaugh of being a rapist, the very same ones who told us Trumps tax cuts would kill the economy, that he couldn't bring manufacturing back,
that he was an anti Semite, etc... the list is almost endless, and they've been wrong every single time. -
I think that at the point where William Barr, a man who has been very loyal to President Trump, says there is no evidence of widespread result-changing fraud, you have to ask yourself whether those who claim to know otherwise are engaged in a great deal of wishful thinking.
-
I think that at the point where William Barr, a man who has been very loyal to President Trump, says there is no evidence of widespread result-changing fraud, you have to ask yourself whether those who claim to know otherwise are engaged in a great deal of wishful thinking.
@doctor-phibes said in Voteflake:
I think that at the point where William Barr, a man who has been very loyal to President Trump, says there is no evidence of widespread result-changing fraud, you have to ask yourself whether those who claim to know otherwise are engaged in a great deal of wishful thinking.
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
-
Lol he's not a Never Trumper.
Heres a twitter thread that quotes extensively from the Judge's order. A Trump-appointed Judge. Who granted standing. And said the case wasn't moot, even though the electoral college had met.
I think there was also the lawsuit in Pennsylvania where drug lawyers admitted that they were not saying there was any fraud
What I read is that lawyers are very concerned not to say anything that is not true in court, as that can cause them big problems and maybe lose their license plus other things. So, they may say something big out of court but once in court by a judge, they are pretty careful.
-
@doctor-phibes said in Voteflake:
I think that at the point where William Barr, a man who has been very loyal to President Trump, says there is no evidence of widespread result-changing fraud, you have to ask yourself whether those who claim to know otherwise are engaged in a great deal of wishful thinking.
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Slurping up the Trump lie of a stolen election is the exact opposite of thinking for yourself, unless you personally have evidence of fraud you'd like to share with the rest of the nation. Otherwise, you're just repeating what Trump and some far right media channels are serving you. And even then, those far right media channels are admitting Biden won. One day you'll accept the fact that you were wrong about all of this. One day.
-
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Slurping up the Trump lie of a stolen election is the exact opposite of thinking for yourself, unless you personally have evidence of fraud you'd like to share with the rest of the nation. Otherwise, you're just repeating what Trump and some far right media channels are serving you. And even then, those far right media channels are admitting Biden won. One day you'll accept the fact that you were wrong about all of this. One day.
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Slurping up the Trump lie of a stolen election is the exact opposite of thinking for yourself, unless you personally have evidence of fraud you'd like to share with the rest of the nation. Otherwise, you're just repeating what Trump and some far right media channels are serving you. And even then, those far right media channels are admitting Biden won. One day you'll accept the fact that you were wrong about all of this. One day.
I started to type a much longer reply and then thought, why?
So, I thought I would be succinct.
Fuck off.
I think there was cheating in this election, by the party that has stolen presidential elections in the past. Just too many statistical anomalies, too many things that do not make sense.
Period.
-
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Slurping up the Trump lie of a stolen election is the exact opposite of thinking for yourself, unless you personally have evidence of fraud you'd like to share with the rest of the nation. Otherwise, you're just repeating what Trump and some far right media channels are serving you. And even then, those far right media channels are admitting Biden won. One day you'll accept the fact that you were wrong about all of this. One day.
If you form your opinions based on what someone tells you, that might be true. I think for myself.
BWAAAAAAHAHAHAHA!
Slurping up the Trump lie of a stolen election is the exact opposite of thinking for yourself, unless you personally have evidence of fraud you'd like to share with the rest of the nation. Otherwise, you're just repeating what Trump and some far right media channels are serving you. And even then, those far right media channels are admitting Biden won. One day you'll accept the fact that you were wrong about all of this. One day.
Go fuck yourself.
-
Ok, so let's recap.
2016:
Trump - 63.0 million votes (46.1%)
Clinton - 65.9 million votes (48.2%)
Result: Trump wins with 304 electoral votes.2020:
Trump: 74.2 million votes (46.9%)
Biden: 81.3 million votes (51.3%)
Result: Biden wins with 306 electoral votes.In 2016, Trump said his 304 vote win "was a landslide", even though he had 2.9 million fewer votes. Ok, no problem, he won fair and square.
In 2020, Biden won with 306 electoral votes, and had 7.1 million more votes. But...this is not a landslide? In fact, it's not even legit because Biden's team rigged the system, despite no evidence and nearly every lawsuit
laughedthrown out?Ok, got it.
