Voteflake

[Larry]

There's lots and lots of evidence. You continue to parrot the leftwing media by saying there's no evidence. But you ARE still wrong.

[89th]

Ok, voteflake

[jon-nyc]

Larry, Team Trump regularly and consistently admits in court that they got jack.

This has been pointed out to you numerous times and always ignored by you.

He’s just playing you guys for for your money and your feels.

[Jolly]

And 70% of the people who voted for him believe he got cheated.

[jon-nyc]

The glorious “some” people who he can fool all of the time.

[Jolly]

Nah, that's 50,000,000 voters. And I suspect at least 10,000,000 or more Biden voters think Trump was cheated and don't care.

That's a lot of "some".

[jon-nyc]

He’s a once-in-a-generation con man.

You’re another one who has never addressed the fact that his team talks a good game on twitter and Newsmax but confesses in court that they’ve got no evidence.

You know that to be true, and every time it’s brought up we get crickets.

[Loki]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

Urban Dictionary's word of the day December 15th.

Voteflake — "Anyone who protests the results of the 2020 US Presidential Election without any proof or evidence"

I saw it too and I don’t go to urban dictionary and it’s been the word of the day for nearly a week now.. Urban Dictionary is pumping it so so hard that the word definition has 20 times as many votes as TDS. Hahahahaha.

I think the word is an urban legend, it’s been manufactured.

[jon-nyc]

As opposed to all those words that grow on trees?

[Loki]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

As opposed to all those words that grow on trees?

Hey you are doing your part in viral spread. It’s got so many votes but no usage we’ve seen elsewhere. Looks very lame at the moment but maybe you like it.

[jon-nyc]

I prefer election truther. Which I thought of on my own, though it’s inconceivable I was the first to do so.

[George K]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

his team talks a good game on twitter and Newsmax but confesses in court that they’ve got no evidence.

cf Russian collusion.

[jon-nyc]

FWIW I've never subscribed to that. Here's me expressing my skepticism in 2017.

[Larry]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

Larry, Team Trump regularly and consistently admits in court that they got jack.

This has been pointed out to you numerous times and always ignored by you.

He’s just playing you guys for for your money and your feels.

And you can continue to point it out, it won't make it true. I can't help it if you and 89th believe everything CNN tells you.

[Larry]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

He’s a once-in-a-generation con man.

You’re another one who has never addressed the fact that his team talks a good game on twitter and Newsmax but confesses in court that they’ve got no evidence.

You know that to be true, and every time it’s brought up we get crickets.

No, we do NOT know that to be true. We know that it's the narrative CNN and the rest of the democrat media pushes, and we know that you don't hesitate to twist the facts, but we do not know this claim to be true at all.

[jon-nyc]

Should be easy to prove, Larry. Just show us the court filing.

[Larry]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

Should be easy to prove, Larry. Just show us the court filing.

Show me the court case that has allowed any evidence to be presented.

And the once in a lifetime con man is Joe Biden.

[jon-nyc]

@larry said in Voteflake:

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

Should be easy to prove, Larry. Just show us the court filing.

Show me the court case that has allowed any evidence to be presented.

A week ago Sunday, the very most recent court that Team Trump appeared in. We have a thread about it here.

[Larry]

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

@larry said in Voteflake:

@jon-nyc said in Voteflake:

Should be easy to prove, Larry. Just show us the court filing.

Show me the court case that has allowed any evidence to be presented.

A week ago Sunday, the very most recent court that Team Trump appeared in. We have a thread about it here.

Ah... the one where a never Trumper writing an article in a never Trumper website tells how the court refused to hear the case....

Without hearing any evidence......

That's the best you've got?

[jon-nyc]

Lol he's not a Never Trumper.

Heres a twitter thread that quotes extensively from the Judge's order. A Trump-appointed Judge. Who granted standing. And said the case wasn't moot, even though the electoral college had met.