Banning Trump
-
-
Bad move.
-
If they are going to have such rules they need to hire a couple rooms full of Charles Kirk wannabes who’s job it is to enforce them on far left voices on twitter, too.
I think of they did that they’d soon find out that the best approach is not to police content that makes people feel ‘unsafe’ or is ‘wrong’. I think they’d settle on content that is illegal or direct incitement of violence only.
IOW if they witnessed their rules being applied evenly they’d be appalled.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
If they are going to have such rules they need to hire a couple rooms full of Charles Kirk wannabes who’s job it is to enforce them on far left voices on twitter, too.
I think of they did that they’d soon find out that the best approach is not to police content that makes people feel ‘unsafe’ or is ‘wrong’. I think they’d settle on content that is illegal or direct incitement of violence only.
IOW if they witnessed their rules being applied evenly they’d be appalled.
@jon-nyc said in Banning Trump:
I think of they did that they’d soon find out that the best approach is not to police content that makes people feel ‘unsafe’ or is ‘wrong’. I think they’d settle on content that is illegal or direct incitement of violence only.
Pretty good encapsulation of how laws come to be in the first place.
-
If they are going to have such rules they need to hire a couple rooms full of Charles Kirk wannabes who’s job it is to enforce them on far left voices on twitter, too.
I think of they did that they’d soon find out that the best approach is not to police content that makes people feel ‘unsafe’ or is ‘wrong’. I think they’d settle on content that is illegal or direct incitement of violence only.
IOW if they witnessed their rules being applied evenly they’d be appalled.
