Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit
-
Georgia (by way of their republican attorney general) has told Texas to fuck off
@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Georgia (by way of their republican attorney general) have told Texas to fuck off
Too late. 18 states and over 100 Republican congressmen have joined the suit.
-
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
-
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
Unfortunately for the swing states, there has already been 2 decisions by the supreme court in the past that set precedent, and the swing states are wrong.
-
[link text](
) -
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
-
Non existent states are joining the amicus.
The GOP has now officially jumped the Kracken.
Only non-witches get due process.
- Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
-
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
-
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
I would have to have a lobotomy. Because no one - no. One. Looking at the numbers honestly believes Biden won this election.
-
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
-
Non existent states are joining the amicus.
The GOP has now officially jumped the Kracken.
@jon-nyc said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Non existent states are joining the amicus.
The GOP has now officially jumped the Kracken.
You are fully aware that those are not "non existent states", that they don't claim to be, and that they are not connected to Either Trump or the GOP. They are independent organizations.
They are patriots too, unlike the organization's that your side spawn, like BLM and Antifa. You trying to make it look like the GOP or Trump are invented states is like me trying to make it look like Biden invented BLM.
-
What about a quiz: Let's guess how Larry will continue his "the election was stolen" BS after all court cases have been rejected. Will it be a) all the justices are braindead liberals, b) the US as a country is doomed, c) Trump actually won the court cases but the media don't report it, d) your guess, ...?
-
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
-
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
I would have to have a lobotomy. Because no one - no. One. Looking at the numbers honestly believes Biden won this election.
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
I would have to have a lobotomy. Because no one - no. One. Looking at the numbers honestly believes Biden won this election.
So you've already decided and nothing could make you change your mind. Hmm I think you were lecturing TG about being open minded a while ago, you might want to think about that.
-
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
I would have to have a lobotomy. Because no one - no. One. Looking at the numbers honestly believes Biden won this election.
So you've already decided and nothing could make you change your mind. Hmm I think you were lecturing TG about being open minded a while ago, you might want to think about that.
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Moonbat said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Maybe. Maybe not.
But sooner or later the truth WILL come out. Just like the truth about Biden's criminal activities, and the democrat party's collusion with China.
What would it take to convince you that the election result is legitimate and voter fraud did not play a significant role?
I would have to have a lobotomy. Because no one - no. One. Looking at the numbers honestly believes Biden won this election.
So you've already decided and nothing could make you change your mind. Hmm I think you were lecturing TG about being open minded a while ago, you might want to think about that.
That's not what I said. Let me simplify it for you. There are so many things that are impossible to do that would have to have been done for Biden to get the votes you're being told that he got that to believe he achieved the impossible not once, but dozens of times, can only be believed by a person with their brain disconnected. The odds of it all happening the way it is being claimed was recently stated as being one chance in one quadrillion to the 4th power.
I believe people can hit the lotto too. But I am not willing to be pushed into believing that one of the most corrupt politicians in the most corrupt political party hit a 1 in 1 quadriion to the 4th power lotto.
-
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@89th said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
@Larry , Trump is like 0 for 50 with his legal attempts by Trump’s “elite strike force”. This is an embarrassing joke. Trump lost...big time. How has he not accepted it? Oh, to string along fanbois like you.
You don't have a clue about his legal attempts because you only hear what you want to hear. You've been pushing the same stupid argumentvsince before election day. So go somewhere and have a seat and watch what happens.
Yes, and I've been right from the start. So much winning.
No you haven't. You've been 100% wrong from the beginning.
Nope, only 16.7% wrong. 5 of my 6 predictions came true. I only missed Question 2.
JULY 30th:
Formal election predictions in regards to the following:1) GOP nominee - TRUMP
2) GOP VP nominee - HALEY
3) Dem nominee - BIDEN
4) Dem VP nominee - HARRIS
5) Who is t3h w1nn4r!? - BIDEN/HARRIS
6) Additional commentary - Mail-in ballots and polling place delays [due to limited locations, staffing, and social distancing] will lead to a number of legal battles and newspaper headlines, but ultimately we'll know the winner by Thanksgiving.https://nodebb.the-new-coffee-room.club/topic/2832/official-election-predictions
You also missed question 6.
-
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
Wrong.
Texas is asking whether an unconstitutional vote cancels out a constitutional vote. The state legislature has the authority to write a state's election rules. If those rules are changed by the Executive, as in Pennsylvania, that vioaltes the U.S. Constitution. At that point, do those votes in Pennsylvania constitute legal and valid votes?
The other issue is the Interstate Commerce Clause, which is why I asked about wheat farmers (which I don't think anybody picked up on, but that's the original SCOTUS ruling). Does the Commerce Clause have any bearing on votes from state to state in a federal election?
Those are two pretty good questions, SCOTUS may choose to hear or not. They are not silliness, as some Dem homers would have you believe.
-
@bachophile said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Not a question of too late. The whole lawsuit Is directed at the swing states. All the swing states are saying Texas can’t dictate to any state how to proceed in an election. I only mentioned Georgia because it’s AG is republican.
If SCOTUS used only one sentence to deny Pennsylvania, I imagine Texas may just get one word.
Denied.
Wrong.
Texas is asking whether an unconstitutional vote cancels out a constitutional vote. The state legislature has the authority to write a state's election rules. If those rules are changed by the Executive, as in Pennsylvania, that vioaltes the U.S. Constitution. At that point, do those votes in Pennsylvania constitute legal and valid votes?
The other issue is the Interstate Commerce Clause, which is why I asked about wheat farmers (which I don't think anybody picked up on, but that's the original SCOTUS ruling). Does the Commerce Clause have any bearing on votes from state to state in a federal election?
Those are two pretty good questions, SCOTUS may choose to hear or not. They are not silliness, as some Dem homers would have you believe.
@Jolly said in Trump trying to get the GOP to sign on to Texas’s useless lawsuit:
Texas is asking whether an unconstitutional vote cancels out a constitutional vote. The state legislature has the authority to write a state's election rules. If those rules are changed by the Executive, as in Pennsylvania, that vioaltes the U.S. Constitution.
This is the funny part. Texas’ governor also unilaterally changed the election rules set by his legislature. We even had a thread about it.
That’s why oral arguments would be so delicious.
This is frivolity. A press release masquerading as a suit. Ken needs a pardon. Though he’ll likely face state charges too.
