Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Starship | SN8 | High-Altitude Flight Test

Starship | SN8 | High-Altitude Flight Test

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
19 Posts 4 Posters 93 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by George K
    #2

    Trying for a launch in about 5 minutes - 4:30 CST.

    Link to video

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG Offline
      George KG Offline
      George K
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      Aborted at about 2 seconds before launch.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Online
        kluursK Online
        kluurs
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Looks like that's it for today.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG Offline
          George KG Offline
          George K
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          "Due to a Raptor engine auto-abort at T-1 second, the SpaceX team is standing down from Tuesday's attempt of a high-altitude suborbital flight test of Starship serial number 8 (SN8) from our site in Cameron County, Texas. We have additional test opportunities available on Wednesday, December 9 and Thursday, December 10. The schedule is dynamic and likely to change, as is the case with all development testing. Stay tuned for more information on the next target test date and time."

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #6
            This post is deleted!
            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Gonna try again in about 45 minutes:

              Link to video

              1 Reply Last reply
              • George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Cool pic....

                Screen Shot 2020-12-09 at 4.16.38 PM.png

                1 Reply Last reply
                • George KG Offline
                  George KG Offline
                  George K
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  BTW, I think the plan is for it to go up to 12.5 kilometers, and then rotate into a horizontal position. Then, re-rotate to a vertical attitude and touch down.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Everything went PERFECT, until it tried to land...

                    Oopsie...

                    Screen Shot 2020-12-09 at 4.53.46 PM.png

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • George KG Offline
                      George KG Offline
                      George K
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      The "landing" site...

                      Screen Shot 2020-12-09 at 4.57.22 PM.png

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • kluursK Online
                        kluursK Online
                        kluurs
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Maybe next time, Bullwinkle

                        4a49a236-c6a6-47df-9653-c305440364bb-image.png !

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          It almost looked like the rocket didn't have enough thrust to allow a soft touch-down. Perhaps the descent was too quick.

                          But, on the positive side, they were able to rotate the craft, and get it aligned with the landing location.

                          As you said, "Next time!"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • George KG Offline
                            George KG Offline
                            George K
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Elon: "Fuel header tank pressure was low during landing burn, causing touchdown velocity to be high & RUD, but we got all the data we needed! Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!"

                            kluursK 1 Reply Last reply
                            • 89th8 Online
                              89th8 Online
                              89th
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Fun video to watch!

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • CopperC Offline
                                CopperC Offline
                                Copper
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Nice video

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • George KG Offline
                                  George KG Offline
                                  George K
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Someone commented that SpaceX is making such progress because they're not afraid to fail in their tests. They know exactly what went wrong with the landing, and they'll fix it next time. I have to agree that more than 90% of the mission was a success.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG George K

                                    Elon: "Fuel header tank pressure was low during landing burn, causing touchdown velocity to be high & RUD, but we got all the data we needed! Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!"

                                    kluursK Online
                                    kluursK Online
                                    kluurs
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @George-K said in Starship | SN8 | High-Altitude Flight Test:

                                    Elon: "Fuel header tank pressure was low during landing burn, causing touchdown velocity to be high & RUD, but we got all the data we needed! Congrats SpaceX team hell yeah!!"

                                    Yeah, I've had a few of those kind of successes. I just didn't share any of them with a worldwide audience.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • CopperC Offline
                                      CopperC Offline
                                      Copper
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      NASA was famous for blowing up rockets for a long time before they stopped (or at least slowed down) blowing up rockets.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups