818 vs. 95,801

[jon-nyc]

They actually can't know this.

All they can do is see the difference between totals for the Senate candidates and totals for the Presidential candidates.

So to get this number they assume that a Biden topline w/ Republican down ballot didn't happen at all. Which is odd considering how much ink establishment republicans wrote about this in the last three months.

[jon-nyc]

[Jolly]

[Kincaid]

I suppose I could see the Stacy Abrams crowd motivated just to vote against Trump. But it seems very surprising that they wouldn't give votes to the Dem senate candidates as well.

[jon-nyc]

It’s the establishment Republicans that vote Biden + GOP Congress

[jon-nyc]

Don’t tell anyone but I voted Biden and the GOP house guy.

He’ll lose, which made the vote easy, but I’m not a fan of the dem candidate. Himself a new arrival, replacing the retiring representative

[jon-nyc]

We had no senators up. So these guys would count me as a naked Biden ballot even though it’s not true.

[Copper]

@jon-nyc said in 818 vs. 95,801:

They actually can't know this.

All they can do is see the difference between totals for the Senate candidates and totals for the Presidential candidates.

So to get this number they assume that a Biden topline w/ Republican down ballot didn't happen at all. Which is odd considering how much ink establishment republicans wrote about this in the last three months.

Why can't they see this? Just look at the ballots.

[jon-nyc]

Go do that. See if they let you. Tell them Michael Flynn’s lawyer says it’s ok.

[Jolly]

I dunno, she's made the Judge in that case look like a sniveling, partisan hack.