Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. 818 vs. 95,801

818 vs. 95,801

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
11 Posts 4 Posters 71 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    True?

    https://thenewamerican.com/in-ga-818-people-voted-only-for-trump-not-senate-race-for-biden-it-was-95801/

    If so, interesting...

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      They actually can't know this.

      All they can do is see the difference between totals for the Senate candidates and totals for the Presidential candidates.

      So to get this number they assume that a Biden topline w/ Republican down ballot didn't happen at all. Which is odd considering how much ink establishment republicans wrote about this in the last three months.

      You were warned.

      CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        You were warned.

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          @jon-nyc said in 818 vs. 95,801:

          May they burn in hell.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • KincaidK Offline
            KincaidK Offline
            Kincaid
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I suppose I could see the Stacy Abrams crowd motivated just to vote against Trump. But it seems very surprising that they wouldn't give votes to the Dem senate candidates as well.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              It’s the establishment Republicans that vote Biden + GOP Congress

              You were warned.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Don’t tell anyone but I voted Biden and the GOP house guy.

                He’ll lose, which made the vote easy, but I’m not a fan of the dem candidate. Himself a new arrival, replacing the retiring representative

                You were warned.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  We had no senators up. So these guys would count me as a naked Biden ballot even though it’s not true.

                  You were warned.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    They actually can't know this.

                    All they can do is see the difference between totals for the Senate candidates and totals for the Presidential candidates.

                    So to get this number they assume that a Biden topline w/ Republican down ballot didn't happen at all. Which is odd considering how much ink establishment republicans wrote about this in the last three months.

                    CopperC Offline
                    CopperC Offline
                    Copper
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #9

                    @jon-nyc said in 818 vs. 95,801:

                    They actually can't know this.

                    All they can do is see the difference between totals for the Senate candidates and totals for the Presidential candidates.

                    So to get this number they assume that a Biden topline w/ Republican down ballot didn't happen at all. Which is odd considering how much ink establishment republicans wrote about this in the last three months.

                    Why can't they see this? Just look at the ballots.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      Go do that. See if they let you. Tell them Michael Flynn’s lawyer says it’s ok.

                      You were warned.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • JollyJ Offline
                        JollyJ Offline
                        Jolly
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        I dunno, she's made the Judge in that case look like a sniveling, partisan hack.

                        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups