Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
According to the evidence I've accrued from watching the documentary series The
YoungNew PopeFIFY
Loved that show. The cinematography alone made it worth a watch.
ETA: And, of course John Malkovich, who is one of the most intriguing characters in Hollywood.
@George-K said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
According to the evidence I've accrued from watching the documentary series The
YoungNew PopeFIFY
Loved that show. The cinematography alone made it worth a watch.
ETA: And, of course John Malkovich, who is one of the most intriguing characters in Hollywood.
He and Nick Offerman started their acting careers out together. Their whole group is kinda quirky to say the least.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
According to the evidence I've accrued from watching the documentary series The
YoungNew PopeFIFY
Loved that show. The cinematography alone made it worth a watch.
ETA: And, of course John Malkovich, who is one of the most intriguing characters in Hollywood.
@George-K said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
According to the evidence I've accrued from watching the documentary series The
YoungNew PopeFIFY
Loved that show. The cinematography alone made it worth a watch.
ETA: And, of course John Malkovich, who is one of the most intriguing characters in Hollywood.
I thought both series were great. Jude Law was also excellent as the brash yank, and I very much liked Cardinal Vioello. Well, maybe 'liked' isn't quite the word I'm looking before.
-
The pop's comments are meaningless. Neither the pope nor the Catholic church have any authority over the state. When he announces that he is endorsing Catholics church same sex marriages, then it's newsworthy. N't until then. He might as well have said he endorses drivers licenses.
-
@Axtremus said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
Look at how it's phrased:
"Francis indicates support"
"he thinks same-sex couples should be allowed"
"Homosexual people have a right to be in a family,"
"He was always opposed to marriage being for same-sex couples. But he believed the church should advocate for a civil union law for gay couples"
So, he's speaking not as Pope, but as an individual. This is not dogma - yet.
But any significant doctrinal change on such an issue would typically be presented in a more formal way and after much internal debate. There is, for now, little sign that either is imminent.
-
I don't see that this is unimportant. In some predominantly Catholic countries there is a history of anti-gay culture and behaviour, and he's clearly trying to use his influence to push away from this.
Roman Catholics listen to what he says, whether or not it's considered dogma.
-
I don't see that this is unimportant. In some predominantly Catholic countries there is a history of anti-gay culture and behaviour, and he's clearly trying to use his influence to push away from this.
Roman Catholics listen to what he says, whether or not it's considered dogma.
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
I don't see that this is unimportant. In some predominantly Catholic countries there is a history of anti-gay culture and behaviour, and he's clearly trying to use his influence to push away from this.
Roman Catholics listen to what he says, whether or not it's considered dogma.
Folks who are interested should read about the backgrounds of Benedict and Francis. Saying they're different is probably a euphemism.
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
I don't see that this is unimportant. In some predominantly Catholic countries there is a history of anti-gay culture and behaviour, and he's clearly trying to use his influence to push away from this.
Roman Catholics listen to what he says, whether or not it's considered dogma.
Folks who are interested should read about the backgrounds of Benedict and Francis. Saying they're different is probably a euphemism.
@Aqua-Letifer said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Pope Francis For Same-Sex Civil Union:
I don't see that this is unimportant. In some predominantly Catholic countries there is a history of anti-gay culture and behaviour, and he's clearly trying to use his influence to push away from this.
Roman Catholics listen to what he says, whether or not it's considered dogma.
Folks who are interested should read about the backgrounds of Benedict and Francis. Saying they're different is probably a euphemism.
Supporters in both camps can claim they're getting back to Christian fundamentals.
-
Vatican says Pope's comments on same-sex civil unions were taken out of context
https://www.cnn.com/2020/11/02/europe/vatican-pope-civil-union-intl/index.html
— — — —
The Vatican has sought to clarify Pope Francis' comments in support of same-sex civil unions, saying they were taken out of context and do not signal a change in doctrine.In a letter sent on October 30 from the Vatican's Secretariat of State to papal representatives (nuncios) around the world, the Vatican said that two comments made by Pope Francis in the film "Francesco" by Russian-born director Evgeny Afineevsky were taken out of context.
— — — —
