Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. "Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?"

"Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?"

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
69 Posts 16 Posters 1.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • JollyJ Jolly

    @Mik said in "Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?":

    Do we know they were delayed for that reason or are we just assuming and trotting out his signature as the reason? He certainly walked into right it if it was his idea.

    The Treasury said the paper checks are rolling out on schedule and that adding his signature added no time to the check printing dates.

    Figured as much. How much time does it take to sub one signature for another in a computer program? Payroll departments do it all the time.

    H8ters gotta hate...

    AxtremusA Offline
    AxtremusA Offline
    Axtremus
    wrote on last edited by
    #26

    @Jolly It is a completely unnecessary change that (1) creates extra work for the IRS in a time of crisis and (2) confers no additional benefit to the nation. For that, it deserves criticism.

    JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #27

      Try to imagine what job would have said it Trump delayed the printing of the checks for one day.

      Look, adding a sit to a monumental program has been done in the past and it will be done in the future.

      It's a nonstory for the TDS crowd.

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
        #28

        Honestly any additional delay or effort is trivial in the grand scheme of things.

        It's really the principle of it, l'Etat, c'est lui.

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Axtremus

          @Jolly It is a completely unnecessary change that (1) creates extra work for the IRS in a time of crisis and (2) confers no additional benefit to the nation. For that, it deserves criticism.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #29

          @Axtremus said in "Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?":

          @Jolly It is a completely unnecessary change that (1) creates extra work for the IRS in a time of crisis and (2) confers no additional benefit to the nation. For that, it deserves criticism.

          Horsefeathers.

          The IRS has a due date of 7/15 for tax returns. I suspect they aren't near as busy this time of year as usual.

          And if you judge the Federal government by the yardstick of unnecessary, let's have a talk about the Department of Education and their 68 billion dollar budget.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • AxtremusA Offline
            AxtremusA Offline
            Axtremus
            wrote on last edited by
            #30

            @Jolly you see federal work that is "unnecessary," so you criticize that.
            Adding Trump's name to the checks is definitely unnecessary. So that, too, deserves criticism.

            JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
            • CopperC Offline
              CopperC Offline
              Copper
              wrote on last edited by
              #31

              He is hoping to increase his name recognition for the upcoming election.

              Standard for any politician.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                @Jolly you see federal work that is "unnecessary," so you criticize that.
                Adding Trump's name to the checks is definitely unnecessary. So that, too, deserves criticism.

                JollyJ Offline
                JollyJ Offline
                Jolly
                wrote on last edited by Jolly
                #32

                @Axtremus said in "Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?":

                @Jolly you see federal work that is "unnecessary," so you criticize that.
                Adding Trump's name to the checks is definitely unnecessary. So that, too, deserves criticism.

                Excuse me, who is the President? Does it hurt to have his name on the check? How much was the supplemental appropriation to hire the army of programmers it took to effect this change?

                Your position is so absurd, it's laughable. You have now equated a small signature change that cost nothing, to an unneeded federal department that costs billions of dollars.

                Bwahahahahahahahaha!!!

                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #33

                  Why don't we put his signature on the death certificates?

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    Why don't we put his signature on the death certificates?

                    JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #34

                    @jon-nyc said in "Mr. President, when are you going to sign the checks?":

                    Why don't we put his signature on the death certificates?

                    Because legally, you can't do that. Do you wish to change the law?

                    Would make for an impressive looking document...

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote on last edited by Mik
                      #35

                      The optics of the check sig are terrible, no matter how you look at it.

                      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • markM Offline
                        markM Offline
                        mark
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #36

                        Self aggrandizing bullshit!

                        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                        • KlausK Online
                          KlausK Online
                          Klaus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #37

                          I'm pretty sure Trump has already toyed with the idea of his signature and image on dollar bills.

                          markM 1 Reply Last reply
                          • KlausK Klaus

                            I'm pretty sure Trump has already toyed with the idea of his signature and image on dollar bills.

                            markM Offline
                            markM Offline
                            mark
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #38

                            @Klaus Please! Do not give the megalomaniac any more ideas.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #39

                              It's almost as bad as Pelosi and her big box of ink pens with her name on them that she handed out when she signed the papers that were intended to put a stamp on the democrat's waste of millions of taxpayer dollars and 3 years of time they could have spent actually doing their job. You know - another one of those things you Trump bashers never bother to talk about.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Loki
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #40

                                Does this impact the direct deposit too?

                                George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nycJ Online
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #41

                                  No

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • L Loki

                                    Does this impact the direct deposit too?

                                    George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #42

                                    @Loki D1 got her money today via direct deposit.

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • KlausK Online
                                      KlausK Online
                                      Klaus
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #43

                                      Unrelated question:

                                      When is the US going to get rid of checks? The last time I used one must have been in the early 1990s. I don't quite understand why they are still in use.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nycJ Online
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #44

                                        Probably sometime between 2050 and never.

                                        Only non-witches get due process.

                                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • CopperC Offline
                                          CopperC Offline
                                          Copper
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #45

                                          alt text

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups