Trump’s indoor rally
-
@taiwan_girl said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Those people went into that arena fully aware of the risks, given a mask for free. If they didn't wear it that's their own fault, not Trump's.
I would think that you would be aware of it as you have very close experience with COVID. For me, the issue with people not wearing masks, staying away from others, is that their actions not only affect themselves, but also can affect others.
I am sure that everyone would think it was crazy if I said that I was going to drive through a school zone at 100 kph. I know the risks, but I am a good driver, so why should it be a problem? Because, my actions can affect others.
(BTW, it is President Trumps fault. If he (or his aides) said that people would not be allowed in with out a mask, and if they took it off inside, they would be asked to leave. Airline companies are doing it and people I have talked to who have been on flights say that it is 100% compliance. Everybody wears a mask.)
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
Are you???
Of course you aren't. It's too much fun and a he'll of a lot easier to just mindlessly beat Trump up with it.
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
-
@Jolly said in Trump’s indoor rally:
It's obvious you weren't raised an American. Americans are born with a strong rebellious streak against anybody telling them what to do.
That’s nice, @Jolly, I hereby tell you to defend all of Trump’s stupid antics and vote for Trump.
@Axtremus said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Jolly said in Trump’s indoor rally:
It's obvious you weren't raised an American. Americans are born with a strong rebellious streak against anybody telling them what to do.
That’s nice, @Jolly, I hereby tell you to defend all of Trump’s stupid antics and vote for Trump.
Meanwhile, you have no trouble voting for a man who just bally-hooed his prospective administration as Harris-Biden. Joe apparently couldn't remember who was on the top of the ticket.
And while you sit here having conniptions about a Trump rally that could have been held outside, but the Demonrat governor of Nevada couldn't let that happen, major shifts in the ME peace process are happening.
That's the problem with so many of the idiots (excuse me, that's actually denigrating idiots, when you compare them to many Demonrat voters) who suffer from TDS, always focusing on small negative things that don't amount to a hill of beans, and totally ignore any positive news, no matter how important.
So I'll defend Trump, warts and all. That way, you can defend a senile old Democrat crook, who has never done much of anything in forty years of government service, yet has grown wealthy while being in the government. A man who threatened a sovereign government, to keep bribe money flowing to his son. A man who helped take millions off of the Chinese to enrich his family. A man who has plagiarized papers and documents, dating back to his days in law school. Hell, the man is so senile, he even plagiarized himself, in his acceptance speech at the END convention.
Yeah, you vote for the swamp. You deserve them.
-
-
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
It's not fake news:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/trump-rally.html
"The decision to hold a rally indoors, officials said, was something of a last resort for a campaign that had tried to procure five different outdoor locations. A Trump campaign official said they all faced pressure from state officials not to host the rally."
-
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump’s indoor rally:
People who don't wear masks at public gatherings aren't rebels. It's other people they're putting at risk. The word isn't rebel, it's asshole.
And in America, you can be an asshole, as long as you don't trample on someone else's right.
@Jolly said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Doctor-Phibes said in Trump’s indoor rally:
People who don't wear masks at public gatherings aren't rebels. It's other people they're putting at risk. The word isn't rebel, it's asshole.
And in America, you can be an asshole, as long as you don't trample on someone else's right.
The fact that you have the legal right to do something doesn't make it OK.
I've noticed that people use the US Constitution a lot to defend being a knobhead. Sure, they're not breaking the law, but they're still a knobhead
-
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@taiwan_girl said in Trump’s indoor rally:
... people who complain that their "rights are being taken away" ...
I bet most of these anti-maskers wear seat belts when they drive, without complaining.
I suspect most of the people who don't wear masks believe that the protection offered by the mask isn't worth mentioning.
I know, I know, cnn screams all day long about the magical qualities of the mask. How could they not believe?
The sad part is that if cnn became anti-mask, a lot of these people would probably wear one.
-
Ewwwww.
-
Ah, OK, I missed that.
-
President Trump on Howard Stern show
Trump: “My daughter is beautiful, Ivanka."
Stern: “By the way, your daughter…”
Trump: “ - she’s beautiful"
Stern: “Can I say this? A piece of ass.”
Trump: “Yeah.”On The View, 2006
Donald and Ivanka appeared together on The View while promoting Season Three of The Apprentice, in which Mr Trump’s children featured for the first time as his advisors.
When asked how he would react if Ivanka, a former teen model, posed for Playboy, Trump replied, "It would be really disappointing — not really."
He added: "I don't think Ivanka would do that, although she does have a very nice figure. I've said if Ivanka weren't my daughter, perhaps I'd be dating her."
On the Dr Oz show, September 2016
The Republican was discussing long-awaited details about his health, and was joined on stage for the pre-record by Ivanka. After they kissed, the host commented: “It’s nice to see a dad kiss his daughter.”
According to several studio witnesses, Mr Trump replied that he kisses Ivanka “with every chance [he] gets”. The comment was apparently edited out of the final cut of the show when it went to air.
So our choice of President is between two creepy old men? LOL
-
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
It's not fake news:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/trump-rally.html
"The decision to hold a rally indoors, officials said, was something of a last resort for a campaign that had tried to procure five different outdoor locations. A Trump campaign official said they all faced pressure from state officials not to host the rally."
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
It's not fake news:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/trump-rally.html
"The decision to hold a rally indoors, officials said, was something of a last resort for a campaign that had tried to procure five different outdoor locations. A Trump campaign official said they all faced pressure from state officials not to host the rally."
Yeah, like I said. All of my points are valid, and your claim that the governor "refused to approve outdoor venues" is false, and fake news. His office had "no involvement or communication with the event organizers or potential hosts regarding the proposed campaign events advertised by the Trump campaign".
-
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
It's not fake news:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/trump-rally.html
"The decision to hold a rally indoors, officials said, was something of a last resort for a campaign that had tried to procure five different outdoor locations. A Trump campaign official said they all faced pressure from state officials not to host the rally."
Yeah, like I said. All of my points are valid, and your claim that the governor "refused to approve outdoor venues" is false, and fake news. His office had "no involvement or communication with the event organizers or potential hosts regarding the proposed campaign events advertised by the Trump campaign".
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@89th said in Trump’s indoor rally:
@Larry said in Trump’s indoor rally:
Are you aware that Trump had THREE DIFFERENT OUTDOOR VENUES selected but the democrat governor of the state REFUSED to approve ANY of them, and the reason they were in an indoor facility in the first place was because the democrat governor forced them to have no other choice?
As far as I can tell, this is FAKE NEWS, you should be ashamed of spreading it, unless you can provide evidence that Sisolak "refused to approve...and forced the rally indoors".
- The governor doesn't "approve" the venues
- The governor had nothing to do with those outdoor venues "canceling"
- The outdoor venues "canceled" (did not host) the outdoor events because of the existing mandate against groups with more than 50 people gathering
- The indoor venue at which the Monday event was held, ended up being fined $3,000 for violating the current state mandates
On the flip side, I think it's absolutely ridiculous these events are not allowed and fined when its a political rally, but it's OK when it's a BLM protest.
It's not fake news:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/14/us/politics/trump-rally.html
"The decision to hold a rally indoors, officials said, was something of a last resort for a campaign that had tried to procure five different outdoor locations. A Trump campaign official said they all faced pressure from state officials not to host the rally."
Yeah, like I said. All of my points are valid, and your claim that the governor "refused to approve outdoor venues" is false, and fake news. His office had "no involvement or communication with the event organizers or potential hosts regarding the proposed campaign events advertised by the Trump campaign".
Is the governor a state official? He is???? Then since it was state officials that stopped the Trump campaign from being able to have access to an outdoor venue, the only fake news here is you playing semantics. Since I refuse to believe you're that stupid, I can only assume that you know better.
-
This is why you wear masks
7 COVID deaths linked to Maine wedding and the seven who died DID NOT EVEN ATTEND THE WEDDING!!
-
This is why you wear masks
7 COVID deaths linked to Maine wedding and the seven who died DID NOT EVEN ATTEND THE WEDDING!!
@taiwan_girl said in Trump’s indoor rally:
This is why you wear masks
7 COVID deaths linked to Maine wedding and the seven who died DID NOT EVEN ATTEND THE WEDDING!!
And masks may not have prevented a single death.
A cloth mask is not a panacea or wonder weapon against the corona virus. If so, there wouldn't have been a single case in China after mandatory masking. They do help slow the spread of the disease, as do other measures, such as hand-washing and social distancing.
The people at the wedding made a conscious decision about wearing masks. They probably made the wrong decision.
But, it was their decision to make...
