Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer

Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
30 Posts 11 Posters 262 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Loki
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Cancel people from colleges? Really?

    Time to start putting facist labels where they belong.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • George KG George K

      Oh, that sound you hear?

      That's Sandmann's lawyer salivating - again.

      JollyJ Offline
      JollyJ Offline
      Jolly
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @George-K said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

      Oh, that sound you hear?

      That's Sandmann's lawyer salivating - again.

      After appearing at the Republican Convention, I think it could be argued the young man is now a public figure.

      Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

      George KG jon-nycJ 2 Replies Last reply
      • JollyJ Jolly

        @George-K said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

        Oh, that sound you hear?

        That's Sandmann's lawyer salivating - again.

        After appearing at the Republican Convention, I think it could be argued the young man is now a public figure.

        Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

        George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        @Jolly said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

        Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

        I wonder. What this asshat said is slanderous ("dangerous?") without any proof. I wonder...

        A court just ruled that Palin's slander lawsuit against the New York Times can proceed, you know.

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Offline
          MikM Offline
          Mik
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Transylvania should be very careful too

          “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

          1 Reply Last reply
          • George KG George K

            @Jolly said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

            Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

            I wonder. What this asshat said is slanderous ("dangerous?") without any proof. I wonder...

            A court just ruled that Palin's slander lawsuit against the New York Times can proceed, you know.

            JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            @George-K said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

            @Jolly said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

            Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

            I wonder. What this asshat said is slanderous ("dangerous?") without any proof. I wonder...

            A court just ruled that Palin's slander lawsuit against the New York Times can proceed, you know.

            Actually, I hope so. Our slander and libel laws have become too lax, in regards to public figures.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

              NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

              George KG L MikM 4 Replies Last reply
              • AxtremusA Axtremus

                It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                George KG Offline
                George KG Offline
                George K
                wrote on last edited by George K
                #15

                @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

                It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                You're right. Thread title edited to reflect this.

                Hopefully the ACLU will discipline this staffer who is publicly saying hateful things about teenagers. I mean, we've come to that, haven't we?

                "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • JollyJ Jolly

                  @George-K said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

                  Oh, that sound you hear?

                  That's Sandmann's lawyer salivating - again.

                  After appearing at the Republican Convention, I think it could be argued the young man is now a public figure.

                  Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @Jolly said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

                  @George-K said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU:

                  Oh, that sound you hear?

                  That's Sandmann's lawyer salivating - again.

                  After appearing at the Republican Convention, I think it could be argued the young man is now a public figure.

                  Absolutely crappy on the part of the ACLU, but probably judgement proof...

                  I was just going to make that point. WaPo tired to argue that he was a public figure but that logic was a bit circular - the act of slandering the non-public figure made him a public figure.

                  But after the brouhaha he was almost certainly a public figure. And definitely so after the convention.

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                    NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                    George KG Offline
                    George KG Offline
                    George K
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                    It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                    Turley says that in the article I cited:

                    "While the statement is from someone who expressly identifies as an ACLU staffer on social media, it is not a statement from the group. Yet, the sentiment reflects the growing concern over the new direction of the ACLU and the shift away from neutrality in the support of free speech rights."

                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • AxtremusA Axtremus

                      It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                      NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Loki
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                      It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                      NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                      How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                      George KG AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
                      • L Loki

                        @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                        It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                        NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                        How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                        George KG Offline
                        George KG Offline
                        George K
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                        How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this?

                        Which is what I said a few posts up, about the ACLU disciplining this guy. Actually, people have been fired for non-specific things they've said. This asshat calls out an individual.

                        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • L Loki

                          @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                          It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                          NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                          How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                          AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                          @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                          It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                          NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                          How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                          Nah, this is small potato compared to Pompeo trying to get around the Hatch Act while speaking at the RNC by claiming that he spoke there as an individual rather than as an agent of the State Department. If Pompeo's claim passed the sniff test for you, you should have no issue with this one.

                          Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Axtremus

                            @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                            @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                            It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                            NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                            How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                            Nah, this is small potato compared to Pompeo trying to get around the Hatch Act while speaking at the RNC by claiming that he spoke there as an individual rather than as an agent of the State Department. If Pompeo's claim passed the sniff test for you, you should have no issue with this one.

                            Aqua LetiferA Offline
                            Aqua LetiferA Offline
                            Aqua Letifer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                            @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                            @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                            It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                            NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                            How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                            Nah, this is small potato compared to Pompeo trying to get around the Hatch Act while speaking at the RNC by claiming that he spoke there as an individual rather than as an agent of the State Department. If Pompeo's claim passed the sniff test for you, you should have no issue with this one.

                            Nice whatabout fallacy. 👍

                            Please love yourself.

                            LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                            • AxtremusA Axtremus

                              It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                              NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                              MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #22

                              @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                              It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                              NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                              Totally chickenshit butt covering. Transparent and flimsy.

                              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • Aqua LetiferA Aqua Letifer

                                @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                                NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                                How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                                Nah, this is small potato compared to Pompeo trying to get around the Hatch Act while speaking at the RNC by claiming that he spoke there as an individual rather than as an agent of the State Department. If Pompeo's claim passed the sniff test for you, you should have no issue with this one.

                                Nice whatabout fallacy. 👍

                                LarryL Offline
                                LarryL Offline
                                Larry
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #23

                                @Aqua-Letifer said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                @Loki said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                @Axtremus said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                It's not the ACLU, it's Samuel Crankshaw's personal opinion, see the Facebook post by Crankshaw where he prefaced his post with these words:

                                NOTE: These are my personal views that I am expressing on my personal Facebook page on my personal time. They do not necessarily reflect the views of my current or past employers. I have a First Amendment right to express my views just as Nick Sandmann has a First Amendment right to express his. I will continue to express my views on my personal time.

                                How many people have been fired from their employer for doing just this? The defense doesn’t pass the sniff test to inoculate his employer although it likely passes the legal test.

                                Nah, this is small potato compared to Pompeo trying to get around the Hatch Act while speaking at the RNC by claiming that he spoke there as an individual rather than as an agent of the State Department. If Pompeo's claim passed the sniff test for you, you should have no issue with this one.

                                Nice whatabout fallacy. 👍

                                You just compared apples to oranges, but then you will stoop to any level to justify your defective ideology.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • JollyJ Offline
                                  JollyJ Offline
                                  Jolly
                                  wrote on last edited by Jolly
                                  #24

                                  Personally, if I was a university administrator, I'd jerk a knot in a professor's tail...

                                  https://bigleaguepolitics.com/university-professor-threatens-to-document-nick-sandmanns-behavior-on-campus-calls-his-beliefs-atrocious-and-uninformed/

                                  Wonder if the proffs are monitoring Mr. Hogg at Harvard?

                                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • George KG Offline
                                    George KG Offline
                                    George K
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #25

                                    Sandmann responds:

                                    https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/covington-catholic-cancel-culture-nick-sandman

                                    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • JollyJ Jolly

                                      Personally, if I was a university administrator, I'd jerk a knot in a professor's tail...

                                      https://bigleaguepolitics.com/university-professor-threatens-to-document-nick-sandmanns-behavior-on-campus-calls-his-beliefs-atrocious-and-uninformed/

                                      Wonder if the proffs are monitoring Mr. Hogg at Harvard?

                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #26

                                      @Jolly said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                      Personally, if I was a university administrator, I'd jerk a knot in a professor's tail...

                                      https://bigleaguepolitics.com/university-professor-threatens-to-document-nick-sandmanns-behavior-on-campus-calls-his-beliefs-atrocious-and-uninformed/

                                      I can’t tell if that professor has a tail. One school page refers to the professor as he, the next as she.

                                      The Brad

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • MikM Offline
                                        MikM Offline
                                        Mik
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #27

                                        Good for him. I will reiterate these people should be very careful about defaming Sandman.

                                        “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                        Aqua LetiferA 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • MikM Mik

                                          Good for him. I will reiterate these people should be very careful about defaming Sandman.

                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua LetiferA Offline
                                          Aqua Letifer
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #28

                                          @Mik said in Nick Sandmann is dangerous, says the ACLU staffer:

                                          Good for him. I will reiterate these people should be very careful about defaming Sandman.

                                          Cancel culture's not yet had to deal with that. This is the first serious step back they've had to take.

                                          Please love yourself.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups