Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The billion dollar ballroom

The billion dollar ballroom

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
8 Posts 6 Posters 81 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    You know, the one that wasn't going to cost taxpayers anything? Now the GOP wants to give Trump a billion dollars for it.

    I'm old enough to remember when Trump wanted to jail Jay Powell for cost overruns on a federal building project....

    Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor PhibesD Offline
      Doctor Phibes
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      This would be unbelievable if it weren't so predictable

      I was only joking

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        For the millionth time... he gets away with stuff that would tank other presidents. Like every week there is a once-in-a-decade Watergate level scandal that doesn't even make headline news.

        In this case... imagine a West Wing episode where the President decides to spend a billion dollars on a gold ballroom while many in the country are hurting economically. It would be political suicide.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          It's probably not true. A tasteful, non-bombastic pitch to the American people for a white house renovation to add a venue for large events, for the cost of a rounding error, could easily pass by unnoticed in an administration with good will from the public and media.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            It’ll be bad look for them at the midterms. This is going to put pretty much every Republican on record voting for the billionaire dollar ballroom. With a few principled exceptions

            Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              There will barely be enough oxygen to fit in ballroom dunks amongst the rest of the anti-Trump rhetoric we'll see leading up to the midterms.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girlT Offline
                taiwan_girl
                wrote last edited by taiwan_girl
                #7

                https://www.reuters.com/world/us/federal-funding-trumps-ballroom-jeopardy-after-senate-ruling-2026-05-17/

                A U.S. Senate official on Saturday removed security funding that could be used for President Donald ​Trump's planned White House ballroom from a massive spending package, Democratic lawmakers said, imperiling Republican efforts to devote taxpayer money to the ‌contentious project.

                The decision by the Senate's parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, deals a blow to Trump and his administration, which has sought the money for security purposes related to the ballroom.

                Trump has said the construction of the ballroom would be funded by $400 million in private donations. But Senate Republicans are seeking $1 billion in taxpayer funding to the Secret Service for security upgrades to the ballroom and ​other structures being built beneath it.

                and

                MacDonough ruled that the security funding provision falls under chamber rules that require 60 votes to ​pass most legislation, according to the office of Senator Jeff Merkley, the top Democrat on the Senate Budget Committee.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • AxtremusA Away
                  AxtremusA Away
                  Axtremus
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  Hey @andrea-b , any shame here?

                  1 Reply Last reply

                  Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                  Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                  With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                  Register Login
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • Users
                  • Groups