Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 116.4k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • bachophileB Offline
    bachophileB Offline
    bachophile
    wrote last edited by
    #1214

    Vance wasnt on the agenda because Ghalibaf wasnt going. Steve and Jared are at the Aragchi level.

    taiwan_girlT RenaudaR 2 Replies Last reply
    • bachophileB bachophile

      Vance wasnt on the agenda because Ghalibaf wasnt going. Steve and Jared are at the Aragchi level.

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote last edited by
      #1215

      @bachophile Ah okay. Thanks!!!

      1 Reply Last reply
      • bachophileB bachophile

        Vance wasnt on the agenda because Ghalibaf wasnt going. Steve and Jared are at the Aragchi level.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by Renauda
        #1216

        @bachophile said:

        Steve and Jared are at the Aragchi level.

        More like Rubio is on the Aragchi level. Putin has demonstrated that at most, Witkoff is on the Dmitriev level- that of a favoured nobody. Witkoff has yet to meet Lavrov outside of being seated at the table during the fleeting Alaska Love-in.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #1217

          Interesting.

          "A Chinese businessman puts Trump’s blunders in perspective. 'Trump’s attack on Iran is less consequential than his threat to attack Greenland. When he did that, to America’s oldest allies, I knew Europe would not follow America’s approach to China.'”

          Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • Tom-KT Offline
            Tom-KT Offline
            Tom-K
            wrote last edited by
            #1218

            Here's an interesting analysis by Ryan McBeth explaining why America may just be doing the right thing in taking out Iran's nuclear capability. The real reason is more religious than political.

            Link to video

            Ego similis habere bonum et non curat nunquam accipere malum.

            RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
            • taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girlT Offline
              taiwan_girl
              wrote last edited by
              #1219

              Interesting to see what happens. Will the republicans do something or just do nothing?

              The Trump administration is on course to blow past an initial deadline for congressional approval for the Iran war on the grounds that the ongoing cease-fire stopped the clock on a 60-day deadline—an assertion met with outrage from Democrats and skepticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill.

              Under a 1973 law called the War Powers Resolution, the president is required to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and withdraw U.S. troops 60 days later, unless lawmakers declare war or authorize the use of force. The expectation on Capitol Hill was that the 60-day deadline expires on Friday.

              In testimony Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the current cease-fire with Iran, which began April 8, stopped the countdown.

              https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-iran-congress-approval-deadline-ff546611

              jon-nycJ AxtremusA 2 Replies Last reply
              • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                Interesting to see what happens. Will the republicans do something or just do nothing?

                The Trump administration is on course to blow past an initial deadline for congressional approval for the Iran war on the grounds that the ongoing cease-fire stopped the clock on a 60-day deadline—an assertion met with outrage from Democrats and skepticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill.

                Under a 1973 law called the War Powers Resolution, the president is required to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and withdraw U.S. troops 60 days later, unless lawmakers declare war or authorize the use of force. The expectation on Capitol Hill was that the 60-day deadline expires on Friday.

                In testimony Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the current cease-fire with Iran, which began April 8, stopped the countdown.

                https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-iran-congress-approval-deadline-ff546611

                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #1220

                @taiwan_girl said:

                Interesting to see what happens. Will the republicans do something or just do nothing?

                To ask the question is to answer it.

                Person. Woman. Man. Camera. TV.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • Tom-KT Tom-K

                  Here's an interesting analysis by Ryan McBeth explaining why America may just be doing the right thing in taking out Iran's nuclear capability. The real reason is more religious than political.

                  Link to video

                  RenaudaR Offline
                  RenaudaR Offline
                  Renauda
                  wrote last edited by Renauda
                  #1221

                  @Tom-K

                  Interesting analysis. Another compelling argument pointing out the futility of attempting to negotiate with religious fanatics.

                  Elbows up!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                    Interesting to see what happens. Will the republicans do something or just do nothing?

                    The Trump administration is on course to blow past an initial deadline for congressional approval for the Iran war on the grounds that the ongoing cease-fire stopped the clock on a 60-day deadline—an assertion met with outrage from Democrats and skepticism from Republicans on Capitol Hill.

                    Under a 1973 law called the War Powers Resolution, the president is required to notify Congress within 48 hours of military action and withdraw U.S. troops 60 days later, unless lawmakers declare war or authorize the use of force. The expectation on Capitol Hill was that the 60-day deadline expires on Friday.

                    In testimony Thursday before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said the current cease-fire with Iran, which began April 8, stopped the countdown.

                    https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-iran-congress-approval-deadline-ff546611

                    AxtremusA Offline
                    AxtremusA Offline
                    Axtremus
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1222

                    @taiwan_girl said:

                    Interesting to see what happens. Will the republicans do something or just do nothing?

                    https://apnews.com/article/iran-congress-war-powers-republicans-trump-authorization-41ef029df176a6486422e9d68aa6d872

                    Republicans say they will defer to Trump on Iran war despite arrival of 60-day deadline

                    ... Congress made no attempt at enforcing that requirement, leaving town for a week on Thursday ...

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1223

                      As I said, this should have been done while W was in office. I supported it then and i support it now.

                      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • RenaudaR Offline
                        RenaudaR Offline
                        Renauda
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1224

                        In principle, I support the stated objective to put an end to Iran’s nuclear ambitions and reduce its overall military threat to the region. What I don’t support is how it is being presented and executed.

                        Elbows up!

                        1 Reply Last reply

                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                        Register Login
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups