Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

The Iran War (was Nuclear Program) thread

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
892 Posts 20 Posters 97.1k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote last edited by
    #879

    https://apnews.com/article/trump-iran-war-former-president-confession-37d8ffa692903d41c47a85245244d971

    Twice on Monday, President Donald Trump said he’d wrangled a confession of sorts from an Oval Office predecessor who he said had expressed regret in a private conversation about not attacking Iran the way Trump has been doing for more than two weeks.

    But there’s just a little problem: Representatives for the four living former presidents — three Democrats and one Republican — said none have been in touch with Trump recently.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote last edited by Mik
      #880

      The devil is in the details and the wording. Trump may not have contacted them, but that leaves open the possibility they contacted him. I put no stock in either assertion.

      I suspect if any did it would be W.

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      1 Reply Last reply
      • kluursK Offline
        kluursK Offline
        kluurs
        wrote last edited by
        #881

        First off, he didn't say that the predecessor was a living past president - and second, he didn't exclude that the past-president was #45.

        RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
        😁
        • kluursK kluurs

          First off, he didn't say that the predecessor was a living past president - and second, he didn't exclude that the past-president was #45.

          RenaudaR Offline
          RenaudaR Offline
          Renauda
          wrote last edited by
          #882

          @kluurs

          and second, he didn't exclude that the past-president was #45.

          Bingo!

          Elbows up!

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote last edited by
            #883

            An astute observation.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            1 Reply Last reply
            • kluursK Offline
              kluursK Offline
              kluurs
              wrote last edited by
              #884

              Best strategic idea since a mustached guy decided he could wage a 3 front war
              80780bf7-c960-4124-9ba5-2bcde89d797b-image.jpeg

              1 Reply Last reply
              • AxtremusA Offline
                AxtremusA Offline
                Axtremus
                wrote last edited by
                #885

                And just like that ... Greenland is spared.
                (Until the next episode.)

                1 Reply Last reply
                • A Offline
                  A Offline
                  AndyD
                  wrote last edited by
                  #886

                  20260226_120921.jpg

                  Looks like part of the US to me

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #887

                    He’s getting frustrated. But at the end of the day it will be really hard to declare victory if he can’t open the strait. Giving up without doing so will embolden the regime and change the calculus of our allies in the gulf and beyond.

                    IMG_1109.jpeg

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Offline
                      MikM Offline
                      Mik
                      wrote last edited by Mik
                      #888

                      It's SO too late to pull the "allies" in. You break it...

                      I'm not sure what they could really add to the picture that we can't anyway.

                      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #889

                        My understanding is raw numbers of ships for escorts. Something like 130 ships a day traverse the straight. Even in small convoys you need a lot of ships.

                        The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          He’s getting frustrated. But at the end of the day it will be really hard to declare victory if he can’t open the strait. Giving up without doing so will embolden the regime and change the calculus of our allies in the gulf and beyond.

                          IMG_1109.jpeg

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote last edited by Renauda
                          #890

                          @jon-nyc said:

                          He’s getting frustrated. But at the end of the day it will be really hard to declare victory if he can’t open the strait. Giving up without doing so will embolden the regime and change the calculus of our allies in the gulf and beyond.

                          IMG_1109.jpeg

                          Seems to me, keeping “the Strait” open for safe passage is very much in the interests of several multinational American oil and gas producers. There are also both large and small US based O & G equipment manufacturers and service companies operating throughout the Persian Gulf which depend on those shipping lanes.

                          The Gulf region supplies Asia with the bulk its sulphur and potash for fertiliser production. With the Strait closed, this driving to price of fertiliser up globally. Owing to this great uncertainty, the rising costs of diesel fuel and fertiliser will make 2026 to be an expensive year for US farmers to sow their fields. Those added expenses will be felt by virtually everyone in the US when they go to the grocery store. If there was no affordability crisis before this, there soon will be especially come autumn.

                          So for Trump to say “we don’t” [use it] is wholly false.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote last edited by
                            #891

                            Yeah as I said before my fear (and, frankly, expectation) is that he’ll give up when the political price of continuing the war gets too high and just paint a bullseye around the current state of things, whatever they happen to be. This could end up being part of it.

                            The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • MikM Offline
                              MikM Offline
                              Mik
                              wrote last edited by
                              #892

                              I still haven't heard much about the state of affairs in country. Seems like if there were uprisings, we'd be hearing about them long and loud.

                              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                              1 Reply Last reply

                              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                              Register Login
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • Users
                              • Groups