Sandmann settlement was almost public
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 12:36 last edited by
That's one rich kid. I am sure this will shape his life's work.
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 12:42 last edited by
Good for him!
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 12:49 last edited by jon-nyc
But wait.. we don’t know, do we?
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 13:05 last edited by
Not specifically, no. But I think we can safely assume a nice round number. Say, buttloads. Buttloads of money.
-
Not specifically, no. But I think we can safely assume a nice round number. Say, buttloads. Buttloads of money.
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 13:06 last edited by@Mik said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
Not specifically, no. But I think we can safely assume a nice round number. Say, buttloads. Buttloads of money.
Probably at least two digits preceding the first of two commas.
-
Not specifically, no. But I think we can safely assume a nice round number. Say, buttloads. Buttloads of money.
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 13:47 last edited by@Mik said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
Not specifically, no. But I think we can safely assume a nice round number. Say, buttloads. Buttloads of money.
He sued 5 more media outlets, too.
This is what happens when you hire 20-year-old staffers and fire your researchers, motherfuckers. Think you can afford it now??
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 19:37 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
But wait.. we don’t know, do we?
If it was insignifucant, CNN wouldn't have sat on it.
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 19:41 last edited by
I’d keep in private too if it got me more money and quicker payouts.
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 19:47 last edited by
He already won the public battle. Now it 's just about he money.
-
wrote on 25 Aug 2020, 20:14 last edited by
@Mik said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
He already won the public battle. Now it 's just about he money.
He almost didn't. Think of which entities still tried to tar and feather him after the longer video came out, and for how long that went on. They all saw the video and then doubled down for awhile.
I think it's very important to keep that in mind moving forward.
-
wrote on 26 Aug 2020, 11:47 last edited by
-
wrote on 26 Aug 2020, 12:14 last edited by
@George-K said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
Heh:
This is Huffpo. I mean imagine that surviving the internal edit process in a real news organization of yore. Putzes. Hahahaha
-
wrote on 26 Aug 2020, 12:37 last edited by
Sandmann should wear a diamond encrusted MAGA hat.
-
Sandmann should wear a diamond encrusted MAGA hat.
wrote on 26 Aug 2020, 12:57 last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
Sandmann should wear a diamond encrusted MAGA hat.
More details of the settlement:
-
That's one rich kid. I am sure this will shape his life's work.
wrote on 17 Dec 2021, 23:13 last edited by -
That's one rich kid. I am sure this will shape his life's work.
wrote on 17 Dec 2021, 23:44 last edited by@mik said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
That's one rich kid.
Yes, but will he ever get over the trauma?
-
@mik said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
That's one rich kid.
Yes, but will he ever get over the trauma?
wrote on 17 Dec 2021, 23:46 last edited by@copper said in Sandmann settlement was almost public:
Yes, but will he ever get over the trauma?
Probably enough to be able to tweet.
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2021, 17:52 last edited by
-
wrote on 18 Dec 2021, 18:07 last edited by
