The Iran Nuclear Program thread

[jon-nyc]

[Mik]

Five’s a little high. We used to”one…two…” and never had to get to three. It worked a lot longer than we thought it would.

[Axtremus]

@Mik said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:

It worked a lot longer than we thought it would.

Did that ever worry you?

[jon-nyc]

A selfie summit coming soon.

[Mik]

@Axtremus said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:

@Mik said in The Iran Nuclear Program thread:

It worked a lot longer than we thought it would.

Did that ever worry you?

Classy.

[jon-nyc]

Hmmm.

[jon-nyc]

[Mik]

I don't quite understand what would be gained by a renewed attack.

[jon-nyc]

Optimistically a regime that didn’t pursue nuclear weapons for millenarian purposes, didn’t build proxy armies all over the Middle East (and soon Europe) to destabilize governments also for millenarian purposes, etc.

But we know better than to be too optimistic about these things.

[Mik]

Had to look up millenarian. Interesting. I find it hard to believe that something as arbitrary as base 10 mathematics (I suspect 10 fingers... 10 toes is the genesis of that) has anything to do with or effect on world events.

And I don't see how another attack is a remotely likely catalyst for that.