Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
72 Posts 11 Posters 456 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Mik

    I seriously doubt he was on a plane to El Salvador today. It stands to reason they would look into his family members, especially children.

    89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #63

    @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

    I seriously doubt he was on a plane to El Salvador today. It stands to reason they would look into his family members, especially children.

    I'm not saying he was on the plane today. But I am fairly certain his wife and kids have no idea where he is and won't for a few days or weeks, at least if he is processed the way they had been doing things in Ohio and Illinois. Plenty of stories where dayworkers are scooped up and the family doesn't even know who to call for information. I recall one story where the daughter moved to Brazil to be with her deported dad, but took her a few weeks to find out where exactly he is after not coming home one day and his work pickup truck abandoned.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Away
      MikM Away
      Mik
      wrote last edited by
      #64

      Yeah, but you are painting this tearjerking story without any specific knowledge of how this is being done. I think you've been assimilated by the Minnesoooota Democrats.

      "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

      89th8 1 Reply Last reply
      • HoraceH Offline
        HoraceH Offline
        Horace
        wrote last edited by
        #65

        Megyn's take today. I see nothing obviously wrong with this. I understand everybody is having a rhetorical field day, but as rhetoric goes, this is fine and coherent.

        Link to video

        Education is extremely important.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Away
          MikM Away
          Mik
          wrote last edited by
          #66

          The guy next to the driver's door was in no danger at all. The guy more in front of the car should not have been where he was, and was not, as far as I can see, hit by the car. In any event, firing into the car was going to do nothing to stop a Honda Pilot unless, of course, you kill the driver. Even though they did it affected the car's path very little.

          Still not buying it.

          "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

          1 Reply Last reply
          • RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote last edited by Renauda
            #67

            @horace

            Coherent yes, but still an only a third party investigation unconvincingly presented as objective and factual. Of course the deceased and her partner were engaged in mischief and obstruction. Both could be dealt with later and elsewhere.

            Beyond that, I remain doubtful. Especially since partisan politicians of all stripes and colours along with their appointed minions within hours of the incident weighed in as self appointed judges and jury on what happened.

            Hopefully, the ensuing investigation and inquiry will reveal the truth. But that will occur if the “partisans” can keep their mouths shut and minds open.

            Elbows up!

            HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Mik

              Yeah, but you are painting this tearjerking story without any specific knowledge of how this is being done. I think you've been assimilated by the Minnesoooota Democrats.

              89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by
              #68

              @Mik said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

              Yeah, but you are painting this tearjerking story without any specific knowledge of how this is being done. I think you've been assimilated by the Minnesoooota Democrats.

              Maybe. I suppose to be fair I was getting my information from a few interviews. I can't say the whole system is like this, but I also haven't seen reports of ICE telling relatives where their family member is when they grab and throw them into a vehicle and speed off, nor reports of how due process is being applied to validate their citizenship. I do have evidence of american citizens being kidnapped then released (this happened to a Target employee near where i live and he was dropped off at a nearby Walmart with a bloody face). Yes, an american citizen was kidnapped, bloodied, and then dropped off miles away. I have evidence of cops going up to brown people here and "cold calling" asking them where they were born. I'd imagine there's a big financial incentive behind ICE right now to deliver a certain number of bodies so they get a bonus or something.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Renauda

                @horace

                Coherent yes, but still an only a third party investigation unconvincingly presented as objective and factual. Of course the deceased and her partner were engaged in mischief and obstruction. Both could be dealt with later and elsewhere.

                Beyond that, I remain doubtful. Especially since partisan politicians of all stripes and colours along with their appointed minions within hours of the incident weighed in as self appointed judges and jury on what happened.

                Hopefully, the ensuing investigation and inquiry will reveal the truth. But that will occur if the “partisans” can keep their mouths shut and minds open.

                HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote last edited by
                #69

                @Renauda said in ICE kills a US citizen in Minneapolis:

                @horace

                Coherent yes, but still an only a third party investigation unconvincingly presented as objective and factual. Of course the deceased and her partner were engaged in mischief and obstruction. Both could be dealt with later and elsewhere.

                Beyond that, I remain doubtful. Especially since partisan politicians of all stripes and colours along with their appointed minions within hours of the incident weighed in as self appointed judges and jury on what happened.

                Hopefully, the ensuing investigation and inquiry will reveal the truth. But that will occur if the “partisans” can keep their mouths shut and minds open.

                I'm not seeing very many ambiguities anymore in terms of what happened. And even if all relevant facts are agreed on, the different interpretations will remain. We'll never possibly know exactly what was going on in the head of the officer who shot her, and it will never be an objective fact whether he should have been in reasonable fear of great bodily harm in that moment.

                Education is extremely important.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #70

                  I mean, he was holding his camera with his right hand, walked in front of the vehicle and switched hands so he could take out his gun. He wanted something to happen and it did. I didn't watch Megyn's video above, but my opinion remains the same... absolutely unnecessary shooting, but also absolutely legal (technically) if a vehicle is driving (barely) towards a cop. If he really thought the vehicle was a risk he wouldn't have walked in front and switched hands so he could have a gun to shoot with.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Offline
                    HoraceH Offline
                    Horace
                    wrote last edited by
                    #71

                    Of course, both participants had it well within their options for the killing not to have occurred. It's two separate discussions about whether the officer committed murder, and whose behavior was ultimately more responsible for the unfortunate ending. Maybe they have exactly equal culpability, that would be nice.

                    Education is extremely important.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote last edited by
                      #72

                      Haha what an idiot, clearly it's 51% to 49%...SO CLEAR.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups