Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Powell speaks truth to power

Powell speaks truth to power

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
13 Posts 6 Posters 95 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor PhibesD Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote last edited by
    #4

    He missed a great opportunity to close with 'Thank you for your attention to this matter".

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

      He'll probably fire him really close to his retirement date so contesting it is pointless.

      By the way my sister works for the Fed board of governors and intends to retire when he leaves.

      RenaudaR Offline
      RenaudaR Offline
      Renauda
      wrote last edited by
      #5

      @jon-nyc said in Powell speaks truth to power:

      He'll probably fire him really close to his retirement date so contesting it is pointless.

      I recalling reading or hearing from some source(s) last year that the POTUS does not have the authority to fire the Head of the Reserve or any of the Board members.

      What would be the ramifications of WH political control over the FR in terms of banking and the US$? Do you think it would trigger a global sell off?

      Elbows up!

      jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Away
        MikM Away
        Mik
        wrote last edited by
        #6

        Go Jerome. Good statement.

        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

        1 Reply Last reply
        • AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote last edited by
          #7

          The alternative would not have put the Federal Reserve Chair in this predicament.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Away
            MikM Away
            Mik
            wrote last edited by Mik
            #8

            The alternative would have done nothing of any consequence.

            That said, if the Dems take house and senate in the midterms this might well be grounds for impeachment. I would not oppose it. he's gone too too far.

            "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

            AxtremusA 1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Mik

              The alternative would have done nothing of any consequence.

              That said, if the Dems take house and senate in the midterms this might well be grounds for impeachment. I would not oppose it. he's gone too too far.

              AxtremusA Offline
              AxtremusA Offline
              Axtremus
              wrote last edited by
              #9

              @Mik said in Powell speaks truth to power:

              The alternative would have done nothing of any consequence.

              Wouldn't be the first time "doing nothing of consequence" is preferable to "doing great harm."

              It wasn't that long ago that Conservatives believed in "the best government is that which governs least."

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Away
                MikM Away
                Mik
                wrote last edited by
                #10

                Trump is addressing a lot of issues that have lingered for a long time, more and faster than any president in my lifetime. One can reasonably argue that he has overstepped his bounds in several instances, but he learned from his first term what a short time you actually have to get anything done. Like it or not he has a vision for where the nation should go and is pursuing that. I will gladly take that over the alternative who likely had no idea what she would have wanted to do or how to get it done.

                "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote last edited by
                  #11

                  I feel like in the past, screwing with the independence of the Fed would immediately cause a massive stock or dollar crash, but what do I know (not being sarcastic). We know the market is important to Trump, I think this is just one step towards a Trump-influenced Fed that'll likely inflate the economy by 2028 so that "Trump" (brand) can win again, only to eventually have a massive correction once folks realize it's inflated with Trump Air (TM).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • RenaudaR Renauda

                    @jon-nyc said in Powell speaks truth to power:

                    He'll probably fire him really close to his retirement date so contesting it is pointless.

                    I recalling reading or hearing from some source(s) last year that the POTUS does not have the authority to fire the Head of the Reserve or any of the Board members.

                    What would be the ramifications of WH political control over the FR in terms of banking and the US$? Do you think it would trigger a global sell off?

                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #12

                    @Renauda said in Powell speaks truth to power:

                    @jon-nyc said in Powell speaks truth to power:

                    He'll probably fire him really close to his retirement date so contesting it is pointless.

                    I recalling reading or hearing from some source(s) last year that the POTUS does not have the authority to fire the Head of the Reserve or any of the Board members.

                    What would be the ramifications of WH political control over the FR in terms of banking and the US$? Do you think it would trigger a global sell off?

                    I think if he tried to fire Powell just a month or two before his term ends the reaction would be negative but muted, knowing it’s subject to court review. I think of the court ok’d it it would be a different story.

                    The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #13

                      IMG_9876.jpeg

                      The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups