Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mildly interesting

Mildly interesting

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
2.8k Posts 34 Posters 565.7k Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • MikM Offline
    MikM Offline
    Mik
    wrote last edited by
    #2823

    The original tweet was meant to do exactly that. Whether you meant it that way I cannot say, but the intention was clearly to support the inequality claim. I’m not projecting anything other than it’s a bullshit statistic for the purpose.

    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

    1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote last edited by Axtremus
      #2824

      Google says:

      In the USA, the percentage of the population aged 70 and older was approximately 9.1% in 1989 and is projected to be around 11.33% in 2025. The share of the older population has increased over this period due to increased life expectancy and the aging of the baby boomer generation.

      Percentage of Population in 1989
      Based on population data, the approximate percentages for age groups 70 and older in 1989 were:

      • 70-74 years: 3.5%
      • 75-79 years: 2.8%
      • 80-84 years: 2.2%
      • 85+ years: approximately 0.6% to 0.9% (extrapolated from data) [4]

      The total percentage of the population aged 70 and older in 1989 was approximately $3.5% + 2.8% + 2.2% + 0.6% = 9.1%.

      Percentage of Population in 2025
      For 2025, projected data provides a more precise breakdown:

      • 70-74 years: 4.5%
      • 75-79 years: 3%
      • 80-84 years: 1.91%
      • 85+ years: 1.92% [7]

      The total percentage of the population aged 70 and older in 2025 is approximately $4.5% + 3% + 1.91% + 1.92% = 11.33%.

      AI responses may include mistakes.

      [1] https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2025/11/06/how-americans-are-thinking-about-aging/
      [2] https://www.statista.com/statistics/457822/share-of-old-age-population-in-the-total-us-population/
      [3] https://www.facebook.com/OfficialPeterMallouk/photos/a-record-32-of-household-wealth-is-now-held-by-americans-that-are-70-years-of-ag/1378770223686396/
      [4] https://www.populationpyramid.net/united-states-of-america/1989/
      [5] https://www.ssa.gov/oact/NOTES/AS112/as112.html
      [6] https://www.cato.org/blog/native-born-americans-are-not-losing-jobs-foreigners
      [7] https://www.neilsberg.com/insights/united-states-population-by-age/

      1 Reply Last reply
      • AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote last edited by
        #2825

        Wealth accumulates for the 70+ crowd faster than the population growth for the 70+ crowd.
        While this does not necessarily suggest "inequity," it does indicate "increased concentration" of wealth for the 70+ crowd.

        Wealth in pension funds vs. wealth in 401(k)? That comes down to control. The wealth in pension funds meant to benefit the 70+crowd is not controlled by the 70+ crowd. The wealth in 401(k) accounts of the 70+ crowd is controlled by the 70+ crowd. Is one "better" than the other? That's a whole other discussion.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #2826

          Generative AI, 3 years in.

          IMG_9760.jpeg

          The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote last edited by
            #2827

            Meanwhile in Spain, one community raises alms for the poor:

            https://www.bbc.com/news/videos/c05834pp6jno

            Elbows up!

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote last edited by
              #2828

              I would so do that.

              "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #2829

                Looks like the real question for how violent society is over time would be ‘what’s the attempted murder rate’

                The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Offline
                  MikM Offline
                  Mik
                  wrote last edited by
                  #2830

                  Interesting idea, and quite likely with some truth.

                  "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Offline
                    MikM Offline
                    Mik
                    wrote last edited by
                    #2831

                    The Hot Dogs Were So Addictive They Had to Be BANNED from Helen Keller’s House

                    Helen Keller is remembered as one of the most extraordinary figures of the modern world. Deaf and blind from a young age, she became a prolific author, a tireless activist, and a global lecturer who spoke fiercely against war, inequality, and capitalist injustice. But behind the public icon was a woman with a very simple, very human weakness. She loved hot dogs.

                    Despite traveling the world and dining in countless countries, Keller’s favorite protein was reportedly the humble American hot dog. According to accounts preserved by the Helen Keller Foundation, she preferred them topped with mustard and relish. No record survives of her stance on ketchup, a mystery that will likely never be resolved. What is clear is that she adored them with enthusiasm.

                    Her love for hot dogs became such a problem that her longtime secretary and companion, Polly Thomson, eventually banned them from their home altogether. Thomson worried that if allowed, Keller would eat nothing else. It was not a symbolic ban. It was a practical intervention against culinary obsession.

                    After Thomson’s death in 1960, Keller’s new assistant, Winifred Corbally, took a different approach. Rather than restricting her employer’s cravings, she embraced them. Corbally frequently took Keller to hot dog stands, indulging her favorite food without guilt or restraint. Keller reportedly had one request she repeated often. “Don’t forget the mustard.”

                    eatshistory.com
                    image.png

                    "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by
                      #2832

                      The nine colleges founded before the revolution.

                      Would not have guessed Rutgers was among them.

                      IMG_9777.jpeg

                      The whole reason we call them illegal aliens is because they’re subject to our laws.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • MikM Offline
                        MikM Offline
                        Mik
                        wrote last edited by
                        #2833

                        It would be interesting to see the curriculum and texts.

                        "You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups