The Epstein File
-
I think we said many months ago even if files were released, there's no way to trust them at this point. It's like asking robbers to open the bank door so you can take fingerprints and they keep saying "sure, just one more minute!"
BTW the FBI site in Winchester is not a secret. It's called the Central Records Complex (CRC). I had a buddy (she was a hot programmer akshully) who worked there a year or two ago.
@89th said in The Epstein File:
I had a buddy (she was a hot programmer akshully) who worked there a year or two ago.
I guess she is not white then. Very few hot white girls get into engineering disciplines. Not unheard of for Asian types though.
Unless you mean hot in a non-physical way. I guess talented white female programmers do exist, for values of hot equal to talented.
-
Stop being mean about 89's imaginary hot friends.
-
I think we said many months ago even if files were released, there's no way to trust them at this point. It's like asking robbers to open the bank door so you can take fingerprints and they keep saying "sure, just one more minute!"
BTW the FBI site in Winchester is not a secret. It's called the Central Records Complex (CRC). I had a buddy (she was a hot programmer akshully) who worked there a year or two ago.
-
-
coders
-
The ONE guy who voted against the release bill. I can't say he's wrong.
"You cannot subsidize irresponsibility and expect people to become more responsible." — Thomas Sowell
-
The ONE guy who voted against the release bill. I can't say he's wrong.
@Mik said in The Epstein File:
The ONE guy who voted against the release bill. I can't say he's wrong.
He says he's worried about the victims. Doesn't he appreciate that the most important victims of this whole debacle are Donald Trump and Andrew Windsor?
-
The ONE guy who voted against the release bill. I can't say he's wrong.
The bill's bipartisan authors – Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Kentucky, and Ro Khanna, D-California – have stressed that the legislation will not expose victims. It stipulates that the Justice Department is permitted to withhold certain information, such as personal details on victims and materials that would jeopardize any active federal investigations.
The Justice Department will not, however, be able to redact information due to "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity."
Yeah right, my emphasis in bold. It may just explain Trump’s sudden change of heart and about face re the so-called Epstein File. Here’s an outline:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/trump-epstein-files-public-disclosure-investigation-9.6983924
-
I can't understand how one man can stop your DoJ, Congress & Senate following legal process. The investigation and prosecution of criminal offences is surely separate from Presidential administration?
@AndyD said in The Epstein File:
I can't understand how one man can stop your DoJ, Congress & Senate following legal process. The investigation and prosecution of criminal offences is surely separate from Presidential administration?
Usually yes. But Trump chose people loyal to him over country. More charitably, people who have been led to believe that his personal and political interests and the country’s interests are one in the same.
