Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.2k Posts 20 Posters 145.8k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 Offline
    89th8 Offline
    89th
    wrote last edited by
    #1134

    Hey I posted in an online forum multiple times that I was against the abrupt shuttering of USAID, so I did my part. I don't even wear a cape!

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Online
      HoraceH Online
      Horace
      wrote last edited by
      #1135

      The scale of money in the Bill Gates trust, among others, beggars my belief that there's such low hanging fruit for donations that an average joe can write a check for a thousand dollars and save a bunch of lives.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #1136

        According to Givewell (the effective altruism org founded by a couple of Bridgewater traders) the marginal cost of saving a life is about 8k. It varies over time but last time I checked buying mosquito nets was the cheapest way to save a life.

        (It’s always some sort of non-pharmaceutical intervention to reduce infectious disease in Africa.)

        If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • HoraceH Online
          HoraceH Online
          Horace
          wrote last edited by Horace
          #1137

          malaria nets. Yep.

          Education is extremely important.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #1138

            This might become a useful economic index as Trump sovietizes our official economic data.

            If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              This might become a useful economic index as Trump sovietizes our official economic data.

              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins DadL Offline
              LuFins Dad
              wrote last edited by LuFins Dad
              #1139

              @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

              This might become a useful economic index as Trump sovietizes our official economic data.

              LMAO! MAHA has to love that…

              The Brad

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote last edited by
                #1140

                Yeah, the article went into that. This has all the usual suspects, food dyes, chemical this and that, an entire quarry of sodium, etc.

                If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1141

                  https://fortune.com/2025/09/21/behind-closed-doors-ceos-say-trump-is-bad-for-business-and-its-time-to-make-america-into-america-again/

                  The Yale Chief Executive Leadership Institute’s CEO forum gathers top political leaders with Fortune 500 CEOs for a Chatham House rules discussion where direct quotes are off the record. In Washington DC this week at the 155th gathering, as clouds swirled around the Capitol building just steps away, senators from both parties and some top Trump administration officials joined us. They had to face down the near unanimous verdict from over 100 top business leaders, representing some of the world’s largest companies and most iconic brands: Trump’s policies aren’t working. These opinions were all about business results, by the way: the reasoning was independent of personal politics or industry sector, it always came back to the bottom line.

                  Business leaders at our forum worry that Trump is undermining an economic system that took decades to build and has long benefited the U.S. more than any other country, under both Republican and Democratic administrations, all for short-term gains. They see what’s happening as a hollowing out of U.S. economic foundations and institutions. In this free-to-speak environment (a loaded topic these days), they said that while they approve of bringing manufacturing back to the U.S. and bolstering economic and national security, they fear for America’s international standing amid the degradation of national security at the FBI, the CIA, and the Pentagon.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1142

                    Trade war is Biden’s fault.

                    If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor PhibesD Offline
                      Doctor Phibes
                      wrote last edited by
                      #1143

                      I'm guessing the one word was actually 'knobhead'.

                      I was only joking

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • taiwan_girlT Offline
                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                        taiwan_girl
                        wrote last edited by
                        #1144

                        https://fortune.com/2025/10/04/president-trump-coin-america-anniversary-likeness-law-treasury/

                        the Circulating Collectible Coin Redesign Act of 2020, which Trump signed in January 2021, states: “No head and shoulders portrait or bust of any person, living or dead, and no portrait of a living person may be included in the design on the reverse of specified coins,” which include the semiquincentennial series among others.
                        This rule has appeared in similar statutes and reaches back to longstanding Treasury practice, though historians note an exception: Calvin Coolidge, who appeared on a commemorative half-dollar while still in office in 1926. Since then, the Mint and the Treasury Department have strictly avoided living subjects—until now.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nycJ Online
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote last edited by
                          #1145

                          If you don't take it, it can only good happen.

                          89th8 1 Reply Last reply
                          • AxtremusA Away
                            AxtremusA Away
                            Axtremus
                            wrote last edited by
                            #1146

                            The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) survey and other private-label data …

                            Whew, maybe no statistician will lose his job this time. 🤞

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              89th8 Offline
                              89th8 Offline
                              89th
                              wrote last edited by
                              #1147

                              @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                              Was the economy in the pool?

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • AxtremusA Away
                                AxtremusA Away
                                Axtremus
                                wrote last edited by
                                #1148

                                Federal government bailout coming for the farmers, again:

                                https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/07/us/politics/trump-farmers-aid-china-trade-war.html

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins DadL Offline
                                  LuFins Dad
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #1149

                                  https://www.cbsnews.com/news/clinton-radio-more-aid-to-farmers/

                                  The Brad

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girlT Offline
                                    taiwan_girl
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #1150

                                    Government subsidy (bailout by a different name) for farmers has been going on for years, decades, etc.

                                    for example,
                                    Ethanol
                                    paying farmers not to plant
                                    crop insurance
                                    etc

                                    I am actually in favor most of these, but to say that President Trump is doing something different is not really true.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins DadL Offline
                                      LuFins Dad
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #1151

                                      I find it very Clintonian.

                                      The Brad

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      Reply
                                      • Reply as topic
                                      Log in to reply
                                      • Oldest to Newest
                                      • Newest to Oldest
                                      • Most Votes


                                      • Login

                                      • Don't have an account? Register

                                      • Login or register to search.
                                      • First post
                                        Last post
                                      0
                                      • Categories
                                      • Recent
                                      • Tags
                                      • Popular
                                      • Users
                                      • Groups