Charlie Kirk Shot
-
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Eh ... "every human heart" seems pretty subjective, pretty arbitrary.
Every? Nothing subjective there. 100%. Each and every single one. Nothing arbitrary, that is an absolute.
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Eh ... "every human heart" seems pretty subjective, pretty arbitrary.
Every? Nothing subjective there. 100%. Each and every single one. Nothing arbitrary, that is an absolute.
How is it not subjective or arbitrary when different human hearts decide differently on whether something is good or evil? Heck, even the same human heart can decide differently on whether the same thing is good or evil at different times.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Eh ... "every human heart" seems pretty subjective, pretty arbitrary.
Every? Nothing subjective there. 100%. Each and every single one. Nothing arbitrary, that is an absolute.
How is it not subjective or arbitrary when different human hearts decide differently on whether something is good or evil? Heck, even the same human heart can decide differently on whether the same thing is good or evil at different times.
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Eh ... "every human heart" seems pretty subjective, pretty arbitrary.
Every? Nothing subjective there. 100%. Each and every single one. Nothing arbitrary, that is an absolute.
How is it not subjective or arbitrary when different human hearts decide differently on whether something is good or evil? Heck, even the same human heart can decide differently on whether the same thing is good or evil at different times.
But it’s not subjective that every human heart draws that line. And it’s also not subjective that every human has crossed that line in their own hearts in both directions.
The Brad
-
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
Eh ... "every human heart" seems pretty subjective, pretty arbitrary.
Every? Nothing subjective there. 100%. Each and every single one. Nothing arbitrary, that is an absolute.
How is it not subjective or arbitrary when different human hearts decide differently on whether something is good or evil? Heck, even the same human heart can decide differently on whether the same thing is good or evil at different times.
But it’s not subjective that every human heart draws that line. And it’s also not subjective that every human has crossed that line in their own hearts in both directions.
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
But it’s not subjective that every human heart draws that line.
Subjective or not, the statement above is likely false -- e.g., one can easily argues that a human in deep coma or with insufficient neurological development draw no line.
And it’s also not subjective that every human has crossed that line in their own hearts in both directions.
Yet many, if not every, draws that line subjectively/arbitrarily.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
But it’s not subjective that every human heart draws that line.
Subjective or not, the statement above is likely false -- e.g., one can easily argues that a human in deep coma or with insufficient neurological development draw no line.
And it’s also not subjective that every human has crossed that line in their own hearts in both directions.
Yet many, if not every, draws that line subjectively/arbitrarily.
@Axtremus said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
@LuFins-Dad said in Charlie Kirk Shot:
But it’s not subjective that every human heart draws that line.
Subjective or not, the statement above is likely false -- e.g., one can easily argues that a human in deep coma or with insufficient neurological development draw no line.
And it’s also not subjective that every human has crossed that line in their own hearts in both directions.
Yet many, if not every, draws that line subjectively/arbitrarily.
I’m bored with this debate, especially when you want to try and play pedantic and semantic games.
-
Okay, this is taking a weird turn.
So it is credibly reported that the roommate that turned over the messages wasn’t just a roommate, it was his partner, who is a Transwoman that is medically transitioning.
-
Charlie Kirk wife at "memorial" service. Almost an entrance more like a wrestle event.
-
Yeah it was an odd spectacle. Some somber moments, some donation-requesting moments (see the crawl on that screen...donate money and get a wristband), some political moments, some wrestling-level moments.... from a wide angle, I think it was nice to see how many people came out in Charlie's memory, but the "look at me" grifting and acting was inevitable, I suppose.
-
There is something wrong with Owens' brain chemistry. She started out nice, I was never a fan or anything but I like the idea of an attractive, black conservative and she filled the bill pretty well. She had a fine bully pulpit on the Daily Wire and a husband straight out of Brideshead Revisited. She probably made a lot of money and could have moved up to bigger and better things--but then little by little she went crazy. Poor girl.
-
A Republican state lawmaker in Florida has filed a bill requiring all of the state's public state universities and colleges to rename one roadway on their campuses after the slain conservative activist Charlie Kirk.
And if they don't, the legislation proposes holding back "state funds" that go to the institutions.
State Rep. Kevin Steele, R–Dade City, filed the bill (HB 113) in the Florida House on Oct. 7. There's no Senate companion yet. Steele wasn't immediately available for comment.
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2026/113/BillText/Filed/PDF
