Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trumpenomics

Trumpenomics

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
1.0k Posts 20 Posters 38.5k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X xenon

    Im still salty that Trump normalized MMT across republicans.

    We’re in for some pain in the future.

    HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote last edited by
    #1036

    @xenon said in Trumpenomics:

    Im still salty that Trump normalized MMT across republicans.

    We’re in for some pain in the future.

    There was never any stopping that train, and the budget deficit would have been worse under Harris.

    Education is extremely important.

    X 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      @xenon said in Trumpenomics:

      Im still salty that Trump normalized MMT across republicans.

      We’re in for some pain in the future.

      There was never any stopping that train, and the budget deficit would have been worse under Harris.

      X Offline
      X Offline
      xenon
      wrote last edited by
      #1037

      @Horace said in Trumpenomics:

      @xenon said in Trumpenomics:

      Im still salty that Trump normalized MMT across republicans.

      We’re in for some pain in the future.

      There was never any stopping that train, and the budget deficit would have been worse under Harris.

      I don’t know. Harris would have had a lot to prove. The republicans would have howled to the high heavens about the deficit (but would have also given her shit if she didn’t cut taxes).

      But they would have at least stuck to their traditional stance of deficits=bad.

      I expect this sort of profligacy from the Dems.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #1038

        There’s talk of firing Powell again. I doubt he goes there. It’s just threats that will be ineffective. I mean the guy is gone in 10 months anyway, is he going to sell out to Trump or preserve his reputation and that of the Fed?

        Thank you for your attention to this matter.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by
          #1039

          I was 4 the last time we had such a dollar slide.

          Thank you for your attention to this matter.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nycJ Offline
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by jon-nyc
            #1040

            Canada is the top export market of American merchandise so far this year, as it was last year.

            Thank you for your attention to this matter.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • 89th8 Offline
              89th8 Offline
              89th
              wrote last edited by
              #1041

              He’s someone who, while he’s talking, the BS Alarm is blaring the whole time. Like a sketchy salesman.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote last edited by
                #1042

                Lutnick (or Nutlick) is about as genuine as a $3 bill.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #1043

                  Stellantis (parent company of Chrysler) lost over $2B thanks to Trump.

                  IMG_6465.png

                  Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                  LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                    Stellantis (parent company of Chrysler) lost over $2B thanks to Trump.

                    IMG_6465.png

                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins DadL Offline
                    LuFins Dad
                    wrote last edited by
                    #1044

                    @jon-nyc said in Trumpenomics:

                    Stellantis (parent company of Chrysler) lost over $2B thanks to Trump.

                    IMG_6465.png

                    No, they lost $1B in directly attributable tariff charges. In all fairness, Stellantis had a drop of 70% from 23-24. Most of the losses so far this year is a continuation of the same drop they had last year.

                    Besides, aren’t the Tariffs ultimately paid by the consumer and not the company? Yet, new car sales are up 3% in the US this year despite the tariffs. And the US is only 20% of the global car market. Blaming the tariffs for Stellantis failings is lazy.

                    The Brad

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nycJ Offline
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                      #1045

                      It’s not just direct costs of tariffs, it included charges for shuttering plants in CA and MX and laying off workers in Michigan.

                      From AP:

                      Stellantis, the maker of Jeep and Ram vehicles, says its preliminary estimates show a 2.3 billion euros ($2.68 billion) net loss in the first half of the year due to U.S. tariffs and some hefty charges.

                      The automaker anticipates an impact of about 300 million euros for net tariffs incurred, and also expects planned production losses related to implementing its response plan.

                      The automaker provided preliminary financial figures on Monday after suspending financial guidance in April due to Trump’s tariffs. It also halted production at plants in Canada and Mexico in response to a 25% tax on imported cars, and it temporarily laid off 900 workers at plants in Michigan and Indiana.

                      Stellantis expects approximately 3.3 billion euros ($3.84 billion) of pretax net charges mostly related to program cancellation costs and platform impairments, restructuring and the net impact of costs related to emission standards. Automakers have been penalized if the average fuel economy of their annual fleet of vehicle production exceeds a certain level.

                      Thank you for your attention to this matter.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • Users
                      • Groups