Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front

Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
24 Posts 5 Posters 392 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #14

    He TACOed on his TACO.

    It’s Tacos all the way down.

    IMG_5874.png

    They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • AxtremusA Away
      AxtremusA Away
      Axtremus
      wrote last edited by
      #15

      TACO is the new flip-flop.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nycJ Online
        jon-nyc
        wrote last edited by jon-nyc
        #16

        Though here he’s saying the focus is on Democratic-run cities.

        So let’s get this straight - they’re going to focus on blue cities, where people are more chill about immigration, and do less in red states, where they are apoplectic about it.

        Ok.

        IMG_5875.jpeg

        They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

        jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
          #17

          I wonder if we’re going to see Lutnik/Bessent style ping pong with Miller and the Ag Secretary. Where policy swings back and forth twice a week based on who talked to him last.

          They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            Though here he’s saying the focus is on Democratic-run cities.

            So let’s get this straight - they’re going to focus on blue cities, where people are more chill about immigration, and do less in red states, where they are apoplectic about it.

            Ok.

            IMG_5875.jpeg

            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nycJ Online
            jon-nyc
            wrote last edited by
            #18

            @jon-nyc said in Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front:

            Though here he’s saying the focus is on Democratic-run cities.

            So let’s get this straight - they’re going to focus on blue cities, where people are more chill about immigration, and do less in red states, where they are apoplectic about it.

            So I guess the rational thing for an illegal in NYC would be to move to central PA.

            They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

            LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
            • AxtremusA Away
              AxtremusA Away
              Axtremus
              wrote last edited by
              #19

              Like @Mik's other thread title, this is sad.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                @jon-nyc said in Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front:

                Though here he’s saying the focus is on Democratic-run cities.

                So let’s get this straight - they’re going to focus on blue cities, where people are more chill about immigration, and do less in red states, where they are apoplectic about it.

                So I guess the rational thing for an illegal in NYC would be to move to central PA.

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote last edited by
                #20

                @jon-nyc said in Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front:

                @jon-nyc said in Possible good news on the immigration enforcement front:

                Though here he’s saying the focus is on Democratic-run cities.

                So let’s get this straight - they’re going to focus on blue cities, where people are more chill about immigration, and do less in red states, where they are apoplectic about it.

                So I guess the rational thing for an illegal in NYC would be to move to central PA.

                Not at all. In general, you are going to see the more criminal element of the illegals living in urban centers. More people, easier to hide, and easier to score. MS13 13 and TdA aren’t generally living in a farming community of 5800 in Oklahoma, they’re living in the he DMV, a metro region with 6M people, and not much agri-business, but plenty of food packaging and processing business, where many shenanigans occur.

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nycJ Online
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote last edited by
                  #21

                  Stipulating all that, why would it not be the rational thing to do for an illegal in NYC to move to central PA? You can wash dishes anywhere.

                  They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nycJ Online
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote last edited by jon-nyc
                    #22

                    Some republican representatives think the deportations might be going to far, or at least targeting the wrong people.

                    As Jesse Singal said, there’s a lot of support for closing the border and deporting criminals but most people have little stomach for seeing the abuelita down the street get dragged into a van.

                    https://www.axios.com/2025/06/10/republicans-trump-deportations-ice-immigration

                    IMG_6222.jpeg
                    IMG_6223.jpeg
                    IMG_6224.jpeg

                    They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins DadL Offline
                      LuFins Dad
                      wrote last edited by
                      #23

                      This is why you have raids, even if you are arresting Abuela. There are so many cockroaches crawling around in that underworld that you have to just spray it all. Sorry.

                      The Brad

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote last edited by
                        #24

                        This seems right to me.

                        They’ll end up, after a lot of drama, with the same formula they use every time they have a trifecta: take away health care and food assistance from low income families and use the money to fund tax cuts for their donors.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups