Emir Force One
-
wrote 6 days ago last edited by
That's right nobody could coverup a 747 and a golf course.
But, again, just like the Statue, David Copperfield might be able to.
Link to video -
wrote 6 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
I'm actually confused on how it will be used as Air Force One. Like... the actual AF1 is a massive military aircraft with endless classified bells and whistles for communications, air defense such as countermeasures, etc. Are they going to just attach all these things onto the wings of this Air Qatar?
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
I suspect the Air Force is just as confused as you are.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
Yeah it'll never happen, IMO.
Air Force One has the ability to refuel midflight, all of its wirings are encased so that it can withstand an EMP attack, heck... there are multiple Air Force Ones that often fly together, one as a backup in case the primary plane has issues.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
It’ll probably be used for non-presidential stuff until Trump leaves office then it will be his new Griftstream V.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
Yup, I dont understand how anybody in their right mind thinks that this is a good idea.
-
Yup, I dont understand how anybody in their right mind thinks that this is a good idea.
wrote 5 days ago last edited by@taiwan_girl said in Emir Force One:
Yup, I dont understand how anybody in their right mind thinks that this is a good idea.
I used to think that way as well, at least until Karoline Leavitt walked to podium and explained it all.
-
@taiwan_girl said in Emir Force One:
Yup, I dont understand how anybody in their right mind thinks that this is a good idea.
I used to think that way as well, at least until Karoline Leavitt walked to podium and explained it all.
wrote 5 days ago last edited by taiwan_girl 5 Dec 2025, 15:30@Renauda LOL
(As with any press secretary. that is got to be one of the hardest jobs. )
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
It wouldn't be used as-is for AF1. It would be outfited as AF1 by the American military, and that would take a while.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
Maybe the Qatari plane exceeds the AF1 standard.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
@Copper said in Emir Force One:
Maybe the Qatari plane exceeds the AF1 standard.
Probably exceeds the threshold of top secret American government communications provided to Qatar, if that's what you mean.
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
Wasn’t there a sculpture or something that the Soviets tried to give the American Embassy in the 70’s that was all filled with electronic surveillance apparatus?
-
Wasn’t there a sculpture or something that the Soviets tried to give the American Embassy in the 70’s that was all filled with electronic surveillance apparatus?
wrote 5 days ago last edited by@LuFins-Dad said in Emir Force One:
Wasn’t there a sculpture or something that the Soviets tried to give the American Embassy in the 70’s that was all filled with electronic surveillance apparatus?
I think it was the whole embassy. LOL
WHen the US was building its new embassy in Moscow, it had to be teared down when it was part completed and they flew in US construction guys to build it from the ground up.
https://www.airandspaceforces.com/PDF/MagazineArchive/Documents/2012/September 2012/0912embassy.pdf
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
No, I found it. It was in the 40s and surprisingly innovative
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 5 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 4 days ago last edited by
Andrew McCarthy calls it what it is.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/qatars-plane-gift-to-president-trump/
-
wrote 4 days ago last edited by
-
wrote 4 days ago last edited by
My question is what does he want to distract us from examining.