Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Lutnik/Navarro Days vs Bessent Days

Lutnik/Navarro Days vs Bessent Days

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
9 Posts 5 Posters 73 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nycJ Online
    jon-nyc
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    From Bloomberg’s Joe Wiesenthal

    IMG_4668.png

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nycJ Online
      jon-nyc
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      LUTNICK: TARIFF WILL APPLY TO FOREIGN CAR MAKERS BUILDING CARS IN U.S.

      Only non-witches get due process.

      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

        LUTNICK: TARIFF WILL APPLY TO FOREIGN CAR MAKERS BUILDING CARS IN U.S.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        @jon-nyc

        Surely an error. That makes zero sense.

        Elbows up!

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote last edited by jon-nyc
          #4

          It might be. While the guy who posted it is a markets guy who usually gets things right I’ve seen this reported nowhere else.

          He could well have meant ‘tariff relief’ instead of tariffs. Meaning for those making 85% of a car’s content here.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            Should hope so.

            Elbows up!

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              This facility was under construction years ago and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with it.

              IMG_4760.jpeg

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              LuFins DadL taiwan_girlT 2 Replies Last reply
              • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                This facility was under construction years ago and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with it.

                IMG_4760.jpeg

                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins DadL Offline
                LuFins Dad
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                @jon-nyc said in Lutnik/Navarro Days vs Bessent Days:

                This facility was under construction years ago and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with it.

                IMG_4760.jpeg

                Does he mention all the Taiwanese on work visas at the facility?

                The Brad

                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                  This facility was under construction years ago and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with it.

                  IMG_4760.jpeg

                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girlT Offline
                  taiwan_girl
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  @jon-nyc said in Lutnik/Navarro Days vs Bessent Days:

                  This facility was under construction years ago and Trump had absolutely nothing to do with it.

                  Yes, this all started in 2013. I guess we should thank President Obama. LOL

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • 89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote last edited by
                    #9

                    I honestly am trying not to be this way, but at this point I have absolute (true absolute) zero trust in anything the administration says. To me, that is scary. If there is a major event (attack, meteor, etc) how can I trust a single thing said? Contrast that to January 2020 during the state of the union where I not only had normal trust in what Trump said, but was starting to like the results. (Things changed during COVID and the election denial, of course)

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    Reply
                    • Reply as topic
                    Log in to reply
                    • Oldest to Newest
                    • Newest to Oldest
                    • Most Votes


                    • Login

                    • Don't have an account? Register

                    • Login or register to search.
                    • First post
                      Last post
                    0
                    • Categories
                    • Recent
                    • Tags
                    • Popular
                    • Users
                    • Groups