Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Faux News is worse than I thought.

Faux News is worse than I thought.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
49 Posts 10 Posters 599 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Online
    D Online
    Doctor Phibes
    wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:43 last edited by
    #24

    I think the main lesson we've all learned from this is what a dreadful person Goldberg is.

    I was only joking

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 8 Offline
      8 Offline
      89th
      wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:43 last edited by
      #25

      Bottom-feeder loser, I've been told by our leader.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • 8 89th
        26 Mar 2025, 14:42

        @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

        And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

        We all know how Trump feels about lies! Zero tolerance for dishonesty.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:44 last edited by
        #26

        @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

        @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

        And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

        We all know how Trump feels about lies! Zero tolerance for dishonesty.

        Answer the question young man and follow it to the logical conclusion.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        D 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 14:45
        • J Jolly
          26 Mar 2025, 14:44

          @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

          @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

          And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

          We all know how Trump feels about lies! Zero tolerance for dishonesty.

          Answer the question young man and follow it to the logical conclusion.

          D Online
          D Online
          Doctor Phibes
          wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:45 last edited by Doctor Phibes
          #27

          @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

          Answer the question young man and follow it to the logical conclusion.

          One of Trump's guys is lying is one possible conclusion.

          Obviously, that couldn't happen. You couldn't find a more truthful, honest and decent group of patriots if you advertised for them in Patriot Monthly, The Magazine for Patriots.

          I was only joking

          1 Reply Last reply
          • H Offline
            H Offline
            Horace
            wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:46 last edited by
            #28

            Any theory that this was intentional will be easily proven or disproven. I am guessing it will be disproven, to very little fanfare.

            Education is extremely important.

            D 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 14:47
            • 8 Offline
              8 Offline
              89th
              wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:47 last edited by
              #29

              @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

              J 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 14:49
              • H Horace
                26 Mar 2025, 14:46

                Any theory that this was intentional will be easily proven or disproven. I am guessing it will be disproven, to very little fanfare.

                D Online
                D Online
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:47 last edited by Doctor Phibes
                #30

                @Horace said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                Any theory that this was intentional will be easily proven or disproven. I am guessing it will be disproven, to very little fanfare.

                What actually happened is that Mike Walz was added to the chat by accident. Mr. Goldberg had tried to have a chat with Mike Hunt, and for some reason auto-correct took over.

                From there, it was just a further series of unfortunate events ending in the conclusion we now see before us.

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • 8 Offline
                  8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:48 last edited by
                  #31

                  lol

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • H Horace
                    26 Mar 2025, 14:42

                    There was no harm done, and it won't happen again. The level of carelessness involved is impossible to defend, and it's put Gabbard and others in a position where they have to spend some of their credibility weaseling around the questions. But this will blow over in any case, mostly because 1. it was an accident that won't happen again, and 2. no harm was done.

                    8 Offline
                    8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:49 last edited by
                    #32

                    @Horace said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                    There was no harm done, and it won't happen again. The level of carelessness involved is impossible to defend, and it's put Gabbard and others in a position where they have to spend some of their credibility weaseling around the questions. But this will blow over in any case, mostly because 1. it was an accident that won't happen again, and 2. no harm was done.

                    Good summary.

                    Hypocrisy was shown too, but we've seen that already with how Trump now uses FBI for lawfare now that he's on the other side of the ball.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • 8 89th
                      26 Mar 2025, 14:47

                      @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:49 last edited by
                      #33

                      @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                      @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                      Did I say hacking?

                      Read very carefully what I wrote.

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      8 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 14:56
                      • J Jolly
                        26 Mar 2025, 14:38

                        Boys and girls, contrary to popular belief around here, no official of either party constantly scours X feeds for security minutiae. The Ap was on their government issued phones. The Ap is on the CIA computers.

                        Pardon me for thinking if that is the case, then the Administration might just assume it is a valid communication tool.

                        My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?

                        And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                        8 Offline
                        8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:53 last edited by
                        #34

                        @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                        Boys and girls, contrary to popular belief around here, no official of either party constantly scours X feeds for security minutiae. The Ap was on their government issued phones. The Ap is on the CIA computers.

                        Pardon me for thinking if that is the case, then the Administration might just assume it is a valid communication tool.

                        Nope. I have some good friends (shocker) that work there. To keep the details simple, there's a network where classified communication happens, and a network where unclassified communication happens. The reference to Ratcliffe's POC is classified as are the military attack details. I believe Signal is only allowed to be used for U//FOUO messages (unclassified, for official use only).

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • J Jolly
                          26 Mar 2025, 14:49

                          @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                          @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                          Did I say hacking?

                          Read very carefully what I wrote.

                          8 Offline
                          8 Offline
                          89th
                          wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:56 last edited by
                          #35

                          @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                          @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                          @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                          Did I say hacking?

                          Read very carefully what I wrote.

                          You asked:

                          My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                          How? Waltz added him.

                          Mistake? Yes.

                          Deliberate? No.

                          Why was his info in Waltz's phone? No idea. Waltz seems somewhat slimy and inept, but I'm guessing the JG contact was in his phone as a suggest contact and when he went to form the Signal group he clicked on JG not realizing it wasn't the trade ambassador.

                          J 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 14:58
                          • 8 89th
                            26 Mar 2025, 14:56

                            @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                            @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                            @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                            Did I say hacking?

                            Read very carefully what I wrote.

                            You asked:

                            My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                            How? Waltz added him.

                            Mistake? Yes.

                            Deliberate? No.

                            Why was his info in Waltz's phone? No idea. Waltz seems somewhat slimy and inept, but I'm guessing the JG contact was in his phone as a suggest contact and when he went to form the Signal group he clicked on JG not realizing it wasn't the trade ambassador.

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            Jolly
                            wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 14:58 last edited by
                            #36

                            @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                            @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                            @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                            @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                            Did I say hacking?

                            Read very carefully what I wrote.

                            You asked:

                            My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                            How? Waltz added him.

                            Mistake? Yes.

                            Deliberate? No.

                            Why was his info in Waltz's phone? No idea. Waltz seems somewhat slimy and inept, but I'm guessing the JG contact was in his phone as a suggest contact and when he went to form the Signal group he clicked on JG not realizing it wasn't the trade ambassador.

                            Keep following the bread crumbs...Why would Waltz have Greenshit's contact info on Signal?

                            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                            8 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 15:20
                            • D Online
                              D Online
                              Doctor Phibes
                              wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 15:04 last edited by
                              #37

                              I often wondered how Doctor Watson used to feel watching the great intelligence at work.

                              I was only joking

                              R 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 15:05
                              • D Doctor Phibes
                                26 Mar 2025, 15:04

                                I often wondered how Doctor Watson used to feel watching the great intelligence at work.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Renauda
                                wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 15:05 last edited by
                                #38

                                @Doctor-Phibes

                                😆

                                Elbows up!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • J Jolly
                                  26 Mar 2025, 14:58

                                  @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                                  Did I say hacking?

                                  Read very carefully what I wrote.

                                  You asked:

                                  My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                                  How? Waltz added him.

                                  Mistake? Yes.

                                  Deliberate? No.

                                  Why was his info in Waltz's phone? No idea. Waltz seems somewhat slimy and inept, but I'm guessing the JG contact was in his phone as a suggest contact and when he went to form the Signal group he clicked on JG not realizing it wasn't the trade ambassador.

                                  Keep following the bread crumbs...Why would Waltz have Greenshit's contact info on Signal?

                                  8 Offline
                                  8 Offline
                                  89th
                                  wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 15:20 last edited by
                                  #39

                                  @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @Jolly said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                  @Jolly What question? Waltz literally added Goldberg to the chat. There is no way around it. No hacking, no typo phone numbers. The way the app works is you have to deliberately select which people to bring in, mostly using the display name (JG, in this case). Some are saying Waltz probably meant to add JG (Jamieson Greer, the US Trade representative).

                                  Did I say hacking?

                                  Read very carefully what I wrote.

                                  You asked:

                                  My only concern with this matter is how did Goldshit get on the chat? Was it a mistake? Or was it deliberate?And knowing that Goldshit has written outright lies about Trump in the past, who would even have the guy in their contacts?

                                  How? Waltz added him.

                                  Mistake? Yes.

                                  Deliberate? No.

                                  Why was his info in Waltz's phone? No idea. Waltz seems somewhat slimy and inept, but I'm guessing the JG contact was in his phone as a suggest contact and when he went to form the Signal group he clicked on JG not realizing it wasn't the trade ambassador.

                                  Keep following the bread crumbs...Why would Waltz have Greenshit's contact info on Signal?

                                  Most likely a "suggested contact" since that is how the Signal app works. I have friends in the government who said the "accidental add" happens very often. Probably one reason classified content is not allowed.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • 8 89th
                                    26 Mar 2025, 13:53

                                    @jon-nyc said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                    I find it notable that, of the dozen or so people on the chat, not one said ‘should we be doing this on Signal?’ That, plus Trump’s comments being only about Walz, suggests the use of signal for NatSec discussions and operations is endemic and will continue.

                                    I'd imagine each defense and intel agency is sending very clear guidance to their employees about if they can use Signal and, if so, what it can be used for. I'd also imagine WhiskeyLeaks & Gang will be very gun shy in the future about using it, so maybe this is (barf) a good "lessons learned" event.

                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nycJ Online
                                    jon-nyc
                                    wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 15:27 last edited by
                                    #40

                                    @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                    @jon-nyc said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                    I find it notable that, of the dozen or so people on the chat, not one said ‘should we be doing this on Signal?’ That, plus Trump’s comments being only about Walz, suggests the use of signal for NatSec discussions and operations is endemic and will continue.

                                    I'd imagine each defense and intel agency is sending very clear guidance to their employees about if they can use Signal and, if so, what it can be used for. I'd also imagine WhiskeyLeaks & Gang will be very gun shy in the future about using it, so maybe this is (barf) a good "lessons learned" event.

                                    Several million people with security clearances will have to undergo extra boring-and-pointless security training sessions triggered by the moronic mistakes of the Fools at the Top.

                                    Only non-witches get due process.

                                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                    CopperC 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 17:11
                                    • 8 Offline
                                      8 Offline
                                      89th
                                      wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 15:53 last edited by
                                      #41

                                      And that costs millions of taxpayer dollars in labor costs. Fun!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • H Horace
                                        26 Mar 2025, 14:42

                                        There was no harm done, and it won't happen again. The level of carelessness involved is impossible to defend, and it's put Gabbard and others in a position where they have to spend some of their credibility weaseling around the questions. But this will blow over in any case, mostly because 1. it was an accident that won't happen again, and 2. no harm was done.

                                        AxtremusA Away
                                        AxtremusA Away
                                        Axtremus
                                        wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 17:05 last edited by
                                        #42

                                        @Horace said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                        But this will blow over in any case, mostly because 1. it was an accident that won't happen again, and 2. no harm was done.

                                        1. Not an accident. The choice to use Signal to talk military plans was deliberate.

                                        2. Hillary's email server also did no harm.

                                        H 1 Reply Last reply 26 Mar 2025, 17:27
                                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc
                                          26 Mar 2025, 15:27

                                          @89th said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                          @jon-nyc said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                          I find it notable that, of the dozen or so people on the chat, not one said ‘should we be doing this on Signal?’ That, plus Trump’s comments being only about Walz, suggests the use of signal for NatSec discussions and operations is endemic and will continue.

                                          I'd imagine each defense and intel agency is sending very clear guidance to their employees about if they can use Signal and, if so, what it can be used for. I'd also imagine WhiskeyLeaks & Gang will be very gun shy in the future about using it, so maybe this is (barf) a good "lessons learned" event.

                                          Several million people with security clearances will have to undergo extra boring-and-pointless security training sessions triggered by the moronic mistakes of the Fools at the Top.

                                          CopperC Offline
                                          CopperC Offline
                                          Copper
                                          wrote on 26 Mar 2025, 17:11 last edited by
                                          #43

                                          @jon-nyc said in Faux News is worse than I thought.:

                                          boring-and-pointless security training

                                          Use the money that was saved on DEI training.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes

                                          33/49

                                          26 Mar 2025, 14:49


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          33 out of 49
                                          • First post
                                            33/49
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups