Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans

The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
208 Posts 16 Posters 4.2k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • X xenon

    I don’t see how they don’t get out of this without a head rolling.

    I’m really looking forward to the dancing on this one.

    Comedy gold.

    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girlT Offline
    taiwan_girl
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    @xenon said in The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Their War Plans:

    I don’t see how they don’t get out of this without a head rolling.

    Someone will. I may be a junior level however.

    Somehow the fact that they were using this against rules, etc. will be justified.

    "Of course, this is different from Sec Clinton"

    "No, Sec Hegsweth and President Trump talking about people who leak classified documents does not apply here. That is only for people who INTENTIONALLY do it"

    etc.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Offline
      HoraceH Offline
      Horace
      wrote on last edited by
      #39

      There’s no point in firing anybody even for the optics, unless it’s Waltz.

      Education is extremely important.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nycJ Offline
        jon-nyc
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        Only non-witches get due process.

        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          There seems to be unanimity among the people on the chat that this type of thing should be criminally prosecuted.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 Offline
            89th8 Offline
            89th
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            Hahahaha it's so awkward. I wonder if Goldberg took screenshots (probably not, since the app likely says a screenshot was taken) or pictures of the content. I doubt it, but then again.... journalism.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nycJ Offline
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              He did and the article includes some.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nycJ Offline
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  IMG_3785.jpeg

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • 89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    LOL

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • bachophileB Offline
                      bachophileB Offline
                      bachophile
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #47

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • 89th8 Offline
                        89th8 Offline
                        89th
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        I'm not terribly sure how accurate that tweet from Malcolm Nance is. Signal uses end to end encryption and while yes I'm sure foreign adversaries are targeting the cell phone devices of these folks, I'm not aware of any breach where all of the crap Malcolm says has been compromised. Even IF somehow they got access to their Signal chat (which they didn't), it's not like a master key to the whole phone.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins DadL Offline
                          LuFins Dad
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          The Brad

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nycJ Offline
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            image000000.jpeg

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jodiJ Offline
                              jodiJ Offline
                              jodi
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              😄😄😄

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nycJ Offline
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #52

                                IMG_3788.jpeg

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #53

                                  This is concerning as it seems to imply Trump’s view is the inclusion of Goldberg was the only issue here. As opposed to using civilian communications channels which they’re all guilty of.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • kluursK Offline
                                    kluursK Offline
                                    kluurs
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #54

                                    I wonder how many congressional investigations. Does Fox cover this?

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nycJ Offline
                                      jon-nyc
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      IMG_3789.jpeg

                                      Only non-witches get due process.

                                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nycJ Offline
                                        jon-nyc
                                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                        #56

                                        Only non-witches get due process.

                                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girlT Offline
                                          taiwan_girl
                                          wrote on last edited by taiwan_girl
                                          #57

                                          https://dodcio.defense.gov/Portals/0/Documents/Library/Memo-UseOfUnclassMobileApps.pdf

                                          SUBJECT: Use of Unclassified Mobile Applications in Department of Defense

                                          Mobile applications (apps) are software products designed to function on mobile devices. The misuse and mismanagement of mobile apps poses a cybersecurity and operations security (OPSEC) risk and may result in the unauthorized disclosure of controlled unclassified information (CUI) and unclassified Department of Defense (DoD) information that has not been approved for public release (hereinafter jointly referred to as "non-public DoD information") and jeopardize operations, strategies, or missions, as described in references (b) and ( c ). This memorandum provides guidance on the use of mobile apps on unclassified DoD government owned, leased or issued, mobile devices (hereinafter referred to as "government owned mobile devices") and on the managed partition of non government owned mobile devices approved in accordance with reference (d) (hereinafter referred to as "Approved Mobile Device" (AMD)).

                                          Numerous mobile apps access or use non-public DoD information (e.g., authorized email apps, collaboration apps, command/control apps). Other applications may be used in support of mission requirements but do not directly access non-public DoD information (e.g., travel and educational apps). Although mobile apps can provide ease of use and increased functionality for users across the Department, there are risks that must be considered. Mobile apps may contain malware or have vulnerabilities that can disclose CUI, personally identifiable information (PII), non public DoD information not approved for public release, or other sensitive information. This is all possible without the user's consent or knowledge.

                                          In accordance with DoD Instruction 5200.48, DoD personnel will not use non-DoD accounts or personal e-mail accounts, messaging systems or other non-public DoD information systems, except approved or authorized government contractor systems, to conduct official business involving CUI. In accordance with DoD Instruction 5200.01, DoD personnel will not use unclassified systems, government issued or otherwise, for classified national security information. DoD CIO will continuously consult with all DoD Components to evaluate risks mobile applications may present to the DoD and update References (m), (n), and (o), as appropriate.

                                          My understanding is that breaking this rule is grounds for dismissal from the military. 🤷

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups