Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Gifts for Putin, Demands for Zelensky

Gifts for Putin, Demands for Zelensky

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
242 Posts 14 Posters 2.3k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #166

    That checks out.

    Education is extremely important.

    taiwan_girlT 1 Reply Last reply
    • HoraceH Horace

      That checks out.

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #167

      @Horace LOL

      I would rank it up with the "stolen election" conspiracy". 555

      1 Reply Last reply
      • X Offline
        X Offline
        xenon
        wrote on last edited by
        #168

        I’ve completely lost the plot on what we’re trying to do in Ukraine now.

        Do we just want our money back? (I don’t think so)

        Do we want the war to end for humanitarian reasons? (We don’t care about all wars in the world, so this can’t be the only thing)

        Do we think we there’s a risk of nuclear escalation with Russia? (Sure, but they did support the opposite side as us when the Syria war was going on)

        I could understand the old stance - don’t appease Russia, don’t let countries capture land through conquest.

        I don’t understand what the current goal is. I’m not even debating what’s right or wrong. I really don’t get the objective.

        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
        • X xenon

          I’ve completely lost the plot on what we’re trying to do in Ukraine now.

          Do we just want our money back? (I don’t think so)

          Do we want the war to end for humanitarian reasons? (We don’t care about all wars in the world, so this can’t be the only thing)

          Do we think we there’s a risk of nuclear escalation with Russia? (Sure, but they did support the opposite side as us when the Syria war was going on)

          I could understand the old stance - don’t appease Russia, don’t let countries capture land through conquest.

          I don’t understand what the current goal is. I’m not even debating what’s right or wrong. I really don’t get the objective.

          HoraceH Offline
          HoraceH Offline
          Horace
          wrote on last edited by
          #169

          @xenon said in Gifts for Putin, Demands for Zelensky:

          I could understand the old stance - don’t appease Russia, don’t let countries capture land through conquest.

          Except we were letting Russia capture land through conquest. Not letting them, would have required military escalation.

          Maybe such escalation could exist without any threat of nuclear war. Doesn't seem like that's a provable claim either way, though.

          Education is extremely important.

          RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
          • X Offline
            X Offline
            xenon
            wrote on last edited by
            #170

            Our objective and how well we lived up to it are two different things.

            I don’t understand what our current objective is.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote on last edited by
              #171

              Trump has mentioned once or twice that he would like to end the conflict.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • X Offline
                X Offline
                xenon
                wrote on last edited by xenon
                #172

                He has. But I don’t know why. Money? It might goad Russia into attacking us? Humanitarian/moral aversion to war? The world is not our problem?

                If it’s the last one - we should drastically remake our military.

                JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                • X xenon

                  He has. But I don’t know why. Money? It might goad Russia into attacking us? Humanitarian/moral aversion to war? The world is not our problem?

                  If it’s the last one - we should drastically remake our military.

                  JollyJ Offline
                  JollyJ Offline
                  Jolly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #173

                  @xenon said in Gifts for Putin, Demands for Zelensky:

                  If it’s the last one - we should drastically remake our military.

                  I think you're going to get your wish...

                  “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                  Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • HoraceH Horace

                    @xenon said in Gifts for Putin, Demands for Zelensky:

                    I could understand the old stance - don’t appease Russia, don’t let countries capture land through conquest.

                    Except we were letting Russia capture land through conquest. Not letting them, would have required military escalation.

                    Maybe such escalation could exist without any threat of nuclear war. Doesn't seem like that's a provable claim either way, though.

                    RenaudaR Offline
                    RenaudaR Offline
                    Renauda
                    wrote on last edited by Renauda
                    #174

                    @Horace

                    Maybe such escalation could exist without any threat of nuclear war. Doesn't seem like that's a provable claim either way, though.

                    You’re right. It’s not. However the doctrine of Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) backed up with a reciprocal policy of maintaining a credible deterrence has kept any use of nukes in check between nuclear powers. Both Russia and the US adhere to the principles of nuclear deterrence developed in the Cold War. Crossing the nuclear threshold is always regarded as a last resort deployment. We used to call it thinking the unthinkable.

                    Elbows up!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nycJ Online
                      jon-nyc
                      wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                      #175

                      Not even allowed to plan. This isn’t appeasement, it’s straight up surrender.

                      Only non-witches get due process.

                      • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #176

                        The Trump administration loves Putin. They really, really love him!

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                          Not even allowed to plan. This isn’t appeasement, it’s straight up surrender.

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote on last edited by Renauda
                          #177

                          @jon-nyc

                          Not even allowed to plan. This isn’t appeasement, it’s straight up surrender.

                          Unless that stand down order extends to NSA and SIGINT I don’t think it is at all significant in terms of security. From what I can tell as is, it only eliminates a level of unnecessary redundancy more than adequately covered by the other two.

                          Elbows up!

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #178

                            Glad to hear that.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • A Offline
                              A Offline
                              AndyD
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #179

                              Perhaps the UK could poach them to work for us. Russians hacked our NHS only seven months ago

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #180

                                Like the leftists used to say about Stalin, Andy, Putin is just misunderstood. You just have to stop threatening him.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • X Offline
                                  X Offline
                                  xenon
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #181

                                  I guess we’ll see what happens. Trump said he’d get the war stopped in a day. I’d be fine with 6 months.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins DadL Offline
                                    LuFins Dad
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #182

                                    I’m wondering if his plan to end the war is by invading Ukraine, ourselves?

                                    The Brad

                                    RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                                    • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                      I’m wondering if his plan to end the war is by invading Ukraine, ourselves?

                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      RenaudaR Offline
                                      Renauda
                                      wrote on last edited by Renauda
                                      #183

                                      @LuFins-Dad

                                      I’m wondering if his plan to end the war is by invading Ukraine, ourselves?

                                      Interesting question. It could very well be since Trump speaks of sending American miners and oil patch roughnecks to Ukraine ostensibly as human shields against future aggression from Russia. If true, both the logic and morality seem strange and borne of a bygone era. It suggests that Ukrainian and Russian lives are of little or no value to him but American material interests on Ukraine’s territory in the form of natural resources are of great value and worth to defend militarily.

                                      Elbows up!

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • kluursK Offline
                                        kluursK Offline
                                        kluurs
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #184

                                        Ukraine could still become our 51st state.

                                        RenaudaR LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                        • kluursK kluurs

                                          Ukraine could still become our 51st state.

                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          RenaudaR Offline
                                          Renauda
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #185

                                          @kluurs

                                          Better them than us.

                                          Elbows up!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups