Hillary Tweets a response to the NYT
-
wrote on 8 Aug 2020, 23:34 last edited by
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 00:11 last edited by
Grammar matters.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 00:12 last edited by
Notice the stealth edit in Hillary's tweet...it's slightly different form what the NYT originally said.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 00:55 last edited by
“Well, that’s what we MEANT, anyway”.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 01:18 last edited by
Haha. Good for her. The NYT issued a correction on Dowd’s column
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 02:03 last edited by
@jon-nyc said in Hillary Tweets a response to the NYT:
Haha. Good for her. The NYT issued a correction on Dowd’s column
Yeah, I agree. "What were you thinking 4 years ago, you morons?"
Of course the fact that the GOP had a (can I say this?) mixed-gender ticket in 2008 was conveniently ignored by inserting the "Democrat" modifier...
...because GOP women don't matter.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 02:08 last edited by
I’m confused. Was the original NYT wrong? Or their tweet about it? Or Hillary’s tweet about their tweet about it?
Ugh, this is why I stay off Twitter. I never know who is saying what.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 02:15 last edited by
Which woman on the presidential ticket was a beauty queen?
Hint: She endorsed Mr. Trump.
-
I’m confused. Was the original NYT wrong? Or their tweet about it? Or Hillary’s tweet about their tweet about it?
Ugh, this is why I stay off Twitter. I never know who is saying what.
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 02:24 last edited by@89th said in Hillary Tweets a response to the NYT:
I’m confused. Was the original NYT wrong? Or their tweet about it? Or Hillary’s tweet about their tweet about it?
The original tweet, which I posted, says that it's been decades since a man and a woman ran together in a presidential election (Mondale/Ferraro).
Hillary says, "What am I, chopped liver?"
Setting aside the fact that she might be just that, her point is well-taken.
-
wrote on 9 Aug 2020, 02:38 last edited by
Chopped liver still has value. Dead meat, not so much. The Clinton era is over.
