Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Power in numbers?

Power in numbers?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
16 Posts 8 Posters 160 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nycJ Offline
    jon-nyc
    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
    #1

    I was wondering if Trump would try to force his Gaza ethnic cleansing plan on Jordan and/or Egypt via tariffs, sanctions, etc.

    But with all the Arab states united, especially with Saudi Arabia, my guess is he backs down. What say you?

    Only non-witches get due process.

    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
    1 Reply Last reply
    • MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

      “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
      • MikM Mik

        It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

        RenaudaR Offline
        RenaudaR Offline
        Renauda
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        @Mik said in Power in numbers?:

        It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

        I think John Bolton might have answered that during an interview shortly after the election:

        "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

        Elbows up!

        MikM CopperC taiwan_girlT 3 Replies Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nycJ Offline
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          RenaudaR B 2 Replies Last reply
          • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

            At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

            RenaudaR Offline
            RenaudaR Offline
            Renauda
            wrote on last edited by Renauda
            #5

            @jon-nyc

            For shits and giggles someone should suggest Trump annex Gaza for a future exclusive resort just to see if he repeats it In a tweet or better, during one of his daily pontification sessions from the Oval Office.

            Hilarity and mayhem are sure to follow.

            Elbows up!

            1 Reply Last reply
            • RenaudaR Renauda

              @Mik said in Power in numbers?:

              It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

              I think John Bolton might have answered that during an interview shortly after the election:

              "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

              MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              @Renauda said in Power in numbers?:

              @Mik said in Power in numbers?:

              It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

              I think John Bolton might have answered that during an interview shortly after the election:

              "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

              Possibly. But when you start with that you know will be rejected subsequent ideas appear more palatable.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              1 Reply Last reply
              • RenaudaR Offline
                RenaudaR Offline
                Renauda
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                We’ll see.

                Elbows up!

                1 Reply Last reply
                • RenaudaR Renauda

                  @Mik said in Power in numbers?:

                  It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

                  I think John Bolton might have answered that during an interview shortly after the election:

                  "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

                  CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  @Renauda said in Power in numbers?:

                  He does not do grand strategy

                  Some people would consider getting elected president to be grand.

                  But being president is not for everyone.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nycJ Offline
                    jon-nyc
                    wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                    #9

                    So you purposely edit out the words ‘on grand strategy’ to expand the meaning of his sentence, without which your comment would be an obvious non sequitur?

                    Only non-witches get due process.

                    • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • CopperC Offline
                      CopperC Offline
                      Copper
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #10

                      OMG, how could I be so foolish?

                      RenaudaR 1 Reply Last reply
                      • RenaudaR Renauda

                        @Mik said in Power in numbers?:

                        It had zero chance of success. I’ve wondered all along what he really wanted.

                        I think John Bolton might have answered that during an interview shortly after the election:

                        "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                        taiwan_girlT Offline
                        taiwan_girl
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #11

                        @Renauda said in Power in numbers?:

                        "He does not have a philosophy. He does not do grand strategy on national security. He doesn't do policy as we normally understand that term ... There's no master plan. That's beyond Trump's capability". ~ John Bolton

                        Agree

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • CopperC Copper

                          OMG, how could I be so foolish?

                          RenaudaR Offline
                          RenaudaR Offline
                          Renauda
                          wrote on last edited by Renauda
                          #12

                          @Copper said in Power in numbers?:

                          OMG, how could I be so foolish?

                          Easy, you’re an ignorant fool by choice not experience.

                          Elbows up!

                          CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                          • bachophileB Offline
                            bachophileB Offline
                            bachophile
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #13

                            Egypt gets a large aid package. I could see the Donald using that as leverage.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

                              B Offline
                              B Offline
                              blondie
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #14

                              @jon-nyc said in Power in numbers?:

                              At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

                              Yup. You hit it.

                              JollyJ 1 Reply Last reply
                              • B blondie

                                @jon-nyc said in Power in numbers?:

                                At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

                                Yup. You hit it.

                                JollyJ Offline
                                JollyJ Offline
                                Jolly
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #15

                                @blondie said in Power in numbers?:

                                @jon-nyc said in Power in numbers?:

                                At the end of the day he is a real estate developer.

                                Yup. You hit it.

                                And POTUS.

                                “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                                Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • RenaudaR Renauda

                                  @Copper said in Power in numbers?:

                                  OMG, how could I be so foolish?

                                  Easy, you’re an ignorant fool by choice not experience.

                                  CopperC Offline
                                  CopperC Offline
                                  Copper
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #16

                                  @Renauda said in Power in numbers?:

                                  @Copper said in Power in numbers?:

                                  OMG, how could I be so foolish?

                                  Easy, you’re an ignorant fool by choice not experience.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Don't have an account? Register

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups