Cropped
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:01 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:06 last edited by
The media is up in arms over misinformation while purposefully pulling this shit. There needs to be some culpability for obvious lies and defamation without infringing on a free press.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:22 last edited by
Walk back Sullivan.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:43 last edited by
To be fair, the composition of the left side of that photo (regardless of skin) doesn't make as good of a photo for the cover with many backs turned, but still... yes misleading, and racist (imagine if the reverse was written). They also picked some pretty attractive people too, is it a crime to be attractive now? If so, LOCK JON UP.
I wonder if a defamation lawsuit will come out of this, I'm sure these kids didn't have a reasonable expectation for their likeness to be associated with being cruel.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 13:52 last edited by
You find Jon attractive? Does your wife know?
Didn't see THAT coming.
-
To be fair, the composition of the left side of that photo (regardless of skin) doesn't make as good of a photo for the cover with many backs turned, but still... yes misleading, and racist (imagine if the reverse was written). They also picked some pretty attractive people too, is it a crime to be attractive now? If so, LOCK JON UP.
I wonder if a defamation lawsuit will come out of this, I'm sure these kids didn't have a reasonable expectation for their likeness to be associated with being cruel.
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:08 last edited byTo be fair, the composition of the left side of that photo (regardless of skin) doesn't make as good of a photo for the cover with many backs turned, but still... yes misleading,
To be fair, they shouldn't have written this, which is an outright lie.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:57 last edited by
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 14:57 last edited by
SEE? I didn't even read Jon's reply yet. It's almost like we finish each other's...
-
wrote on 28 Jan 2025, 15:03 last edited by
To be fair, the composition of the left side of that photo (regardless of skin) doesn't make as good of a photo for the cover with many backs turned, but still... yes misleading,
To be fair, they shouldn't have written this, which is an outright lie.
Well to be fair again, lol... they were quoting a lady there. Allegedly.
Anyway, I "read" the rest of that fuzzy article. Honestly they are acting like this is new. Weird. I vividly recall in my bachelor days (around like 2007?) hanging out in Georgetown and going into bars that were full of preppy conservative folks... you just had to know where to go. Each group has their own hangout spots. Sure I'd imagine there is a new vigor in the conservative circles, but such is the case with each new administration. I'm sure there were plenty of blue hair folks and bull rings in noses after Biden won in 2020.
I actually kind of want to read the rage bait article now... what makes these kids "cruel"? What does cultural domination even mean, and how does that compare to the cultural domination of forced "diversity" and "tolerance" efforts over the last 15 years?
