Couple Ls for the fat man

[Jolly]

Is there anybody in the legal profession that doesn't think Bragg's case gets overturned?

[jon-nyc]

If that happens, think of how historic TFM will be. The first convicted felon to be president, and the president to have his felony convictions overturned. He's just racking up the records here.

[LuFins Dad]

Hysterical.

[89th]

Trump will be known in the history books for his MAGA movement and January 6th. Maybe for presiding over COVID. And his business successes and bankruptcies, and I guess felonies, too. Oh and maybe giving Elon a blowjob, but future kids will claim it's AI.

[George K]

SCOTUS:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/010925zr_2d8f.pdf

---

The application for stay presented to Justice Sotomayor and
by her referred to the Court is denied for, inter alia, the
following reasons. First, the alleged evidentiary violations at
President-Elect Trump’s state-court trial can be addressed in the
ordinary course on appeal. Second, the burden that sentencing
will impose on the President-Elect’s responsibilities is
relatively insubstantial in light of the trial court’s stated
intent to impose a sentence of “unconditional discharge” after a
brief virtual hearing.

Justice Thomas, Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch, and Justice
Kavanaugh would grant the application.

---

IOW, the reason SCOTUS declined is because, as I noted above, the appeal process had not run its course.

[jon-nyc]

Yep. Same as my #2. #s 1 and 3 don’t apply.

[jon-nyc]

What a good look that Alito calls Trump to request a favor knowing more Trump shit was headed his way this week.

[jon-nyc]

“Trump receives unconditional discharge”.

Headline? Or porn flick?

[George K]

A judge sentenced Trump to an unconditional discharge today. I can relate. I had one of those at the Fair in 2007 after a bacon wrapped deep-fried cheesecake. Prayers up to the President elect.

[jon-nyc]

Wait til he meets Bubba, who’s giving the unconditional discharge.

[George K]

[Jolly]

As a tactic, this is the kind of stuff that elected Trump.

Now, this is going to be overturned. When it is, does a really nice case for violating Trump's civil rights exist? I've read some think it does...

[Jolly]

Secondly, is there a civil case in here, somewhere?

[George K]

@jon-nyc said in Couple Ls for the fat man:

(...Remember Hur’s report?)

You mean the one that said the dried up, grifting, child molester was too senile to take to court despite his crimes? That report?

[jon-nyc]

The one the said over and over there was insufficient evidence to pursue him and then he threw in that comment so he’d be a magat hero instead of a magat goat.

But the point is the Biden DoJ released it.

[jon-nyc]

@jon-nyc said in Couple Ls for the fat man:

The one the said over and over there was insufficient evidence to pursue him

That’s the rub. Trump’s won’t show there was insufficient evidence to pursue him. Just not enough time, especially after scotus hit the ‘start over’ button in July.

[George K]

@jon-nyc said in Couple Ls for the fat man:

The one the said over and over there was insufficient evidence to pursue him and then he threw in that comment so he’d be a magat hero instead of a magat goat.

But the point is the Biden DoJ released it.

IOW, you're willing to accept Hur's comment that there's insufficent evidence, but you won't accept the Hur's comment that, at the time the geezer was not quite as brain-addled as he is now.

[jon-nyc]

I mentioned the Hur report. Despite knowing exactly what I was referring to you pretended to ask a clarifying question while your real intention was to frame it differently with some commentary. I did the same.

[jon-nyc]

Easiest captcha evah!

[George K]

Couple of convicted felons:

In fairness, though, MLK was jailed for a misdemeanor