Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Not to brag or anything …

Not to brag or anything …

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
20 Posts 10 Posters 163 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

    Good luck using your program on a number with over 41,000,000 digits.

    Tom-KT Offline
    Tom-KT Offline
    Tom-K
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    @jon-nyc said in Not to brag or anything …:

    Good luck using your program on a number with over 41,000,000 digits.

    I do it with my program at least twice daily. Once I got it up to 328,000,000 digits. But I forgot to write the number down. 😞

    1 Reply Last reply
    • bachophileB bachophile

      41,000,000 is chicken feed when compared to infinity.

      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girlT Offline
      taiwan_girl
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      @bachophile said in Not to brag or anything …:

      when compared to infinity.

      what is infinity +1? 🤔

      jon-nycJ KlausK 2 Replies Last reply
      • 89th8 Offline
        89th8 Offline
        89th
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        I bet in 100 years this will be like discovering 1+1=2. With quantum computing, such calculations should be nearly immediate. Then again maybe my expectations are too high. I'm also expecting within 20 years that AI will be able to accurately translate bird sounds into words. (no kidding)

        taiwan_girlT KlausK 2 Replies Last reply
        • 89th8 89th

          I bet in 100 years this will be like discovering 1+1=2. With quantum computing, such calculations should be nearly immediate. Then again maybe my expectations are too high. I'm also expecting within 20 years that AI will be able to accurately translate bird sounds into words. (no kidding)

          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girlT Offline
          taiwan_girl
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          @89th said in Not to brag or anything …:

          I'm also expecting within 20 years that AI will be able to accurately translate bird sounds into words. (no kidding)

          I had a friend who did some work translating Chinese TV/movies, etc into English captions for Netflix. That has decreased quite a bit.

          I used to do real time translation but I also see that will decrease in the future.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • 89th8 89th

            I bet in 100 years this will be like discovering 1+1=2. With quantum computing, such calculations should be nearly immediate. Then again maybe my expectations are too high. I'm also expecting within 20 years that AI will be able to accurately translate bird sounds into words. (no kidding)

            KlausK Offline
            KlausK Offline
            Klaus
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            @89th said in Not to brag or anything …:

            With quantum computing, such calculations should be nearly immediate.

            Nope.

            Quantum computing, even if it ever works, won't help with finding larger primes.

            Only some very specific problems are theoretically sped up by quantum computers.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • MikM Offline
              MikM Offline
              Mik
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Yeah, computing primes is just a matter of dividing by all the possibilities and seeing if there is a remainder. And of course computers do not actually divide, they subtract a given number of times.

              “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

              89th8 KlausK 2 Replies Last reply
              • Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor PhibesD Offline
                Doctor Phibes
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                In 20 years we won’t be allowed to look for primes because of the fear of upsetting all the other numbers

                I was only joking

                1 Reply Last reply
                • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                  @bachophile said in Not to brag or anything …:

                  when compared to infinity.

                  what is infinity +1? 🤔

                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nycJ Offline
                  jon-nyc
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  @taiwan_girl said in Not to brag or anything …:

                  @bachophile said in Not to brag or anything …:

                  when compared to infinity.

                  what is infinity +1? 🤔

                  Only non-witches get due process.

                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Mik

                    Yeah, computing primes is just a matter of dividing by all the possibilities and seeing if there is a remainder. And of course computers do not actually divide, they subtract a given number of times.

                    89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    @Mik said in Not to brag or anything …:

                    Yeah, computing primes is just a matter of dividing by all the possibilities and seeing if there is a remainder. And of course computers do not actually divide, they subtract a given number of times.

                    You and @Klaus definitely know more than me about primes!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • MikM Mik

                      Yeah, computing primes is just a matter of dividing by all the possibilities and seeing if there is a remainder. And of course computers do not actually divide, they subtract a given number of times.

                      KlausK Offline
                      KlausK Offline
                      Klaus
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      @Mik said in Not to brag or anything …:

                      And of course computers do not actually divide, they subtract a given number of times.

                      No, that would be way too slow. There are many many algorithms for efficient division of integer numbers, such as the Karatsuba algorithm or Newton-Raphson Division.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • taiwan_girlT taiwan_girl

                        @bachophile said in Not to brag or anything …:

                        when compared to infinity.

                        what is infinity +1? 🤔

                        KlausK Offline
                        KlausK Offline
                        Klaus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        @taiwan_girl said in Not to brag or anything …:

                        @bachophile said in Not to brag or anything …:

                        when compared to infinity.

                        what is infinity +1? 🤔

                        If you view numbers as ordinals, infinity + 1 is just yet another ordinal, and it is greater than infinity and smaller than infinity + 2.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • AxtremusA Offline
                          AxtremusA Offline
                          Axtremus
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          And if you really, really, really want to do integer division with quantum computing:

                          https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1432167

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • Users
                          • Groups