Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Biden DOJ sues Virginia

Biden DOJ sues Virginia

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
31 Posts 8 Posters 133 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #5

    Chat GPT...


    In 2006, then-Governor Tim Kaine of Virginia signed a law that required non-citizens to be removed from voter rolls in the state. The law mandates that if someone declares themselves a non-citizen, they must be taken off the voter list. This policy was reaffirmed and is being enforced by current Governor Glenn Youngkin. However, the Biden administration filed a lawsuit against Virginia in 2024, arguing that the process could disenfranchise voters and violates federal election laws by occurring too close to the general election. The lawsuit is focused on timing, as federal law prohibits removing voters from rolls within 90 days of an election   .

    Youngkin defended the policy, asserting that the law was designed to uphold election integrity by preventing non-citizens from voting, and emphasized that the enforcement was initiated in compliance with the law’s requirements.

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by
      #6

      Any responsible Virginian would be familiar with this law.

      Being from out of state I'm sure Mr. Biden is simply not familiar with the law.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins DadL Offline
        LuFins Dad
        wrote on last edited by
        #7

        The Federal Law states you can’t remove voters from the rolls within 90 Days of the Election. I suppose the counter argument is these aren’t voters being removed, it’s illegal for them to be voters, therefore the 90 days is inapplicable.

        The question is why does the Biden DoJ want to keep noncitizens on the voter rolls when they can’t vote?

        The Brad

        1 Reply Last reply
        • jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nycJ Online
          jon-nyc
          wrote on last edited by
          #8

          That’s where I think the lie is. The method probably gets a lot of baby with the bathwater.

          Only non-witches get due process.

          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
          jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Offline
            JollyJ Offline
            Jolly
            wrote on last edited by
            #9

            Bad optics.

            “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

            Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

            1 Reply Last reply
            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

              That’s where I think the lie is. The method probably gets a lot of baby with the bathwater.

              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nycJ Online
              jon-nyc
              wrote on last edited by
              #10

              @jon-nyc said in Biden DOJ sues Virginia:

              That’s where I think the lie is. The method probably gets a lot of baby with the bathwater.

              Which is the point, of course.

              Only non-witches get due process.

              • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
              1 Reply Last reply
              • jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nycJ Online
                jon-nyc
                wrote on last edited by
                #11

                Only non-witches get due process.

                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                1 Reply Last reply
                • HoraceH Offline
                  HoraceH Offline
                  Horace
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #12

                  seems to be some significant wishcasting that this process is so messy that lots of legal voters were removed. Maybe Youngkin is that dumb and brazen, and maybe he’s doubling down publicly in the face of a lawsuit where everything will be discoverable down to the very last name removed from the rolls, and their citizenship status. Maybe he’s that dumb and brazen. Maybe he had reason to believe the citizen voters removed by this process would have voted in ways he doesn’t like. Maybe. Or maybe this was actually just a removal of a bunch of people who aren’t allowed to vote. I know where I’d put my money.

                  Education is extremely important.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • MikM Away
                    MikM Away
                    Mik
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #13

                    Yep. It's all about the criteria. Here it is. Looks right to me.

                    https://www.newsweek.com/thousands-non-citizen-voters-discovered-governor-1937025

                    “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • HoraceH Offline
                      HoraceH Offline
                      Horace
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #14

                      I wonder what the Venn overlap is between people who giggle and sneer at Trump supporters who theorize about election shenanigans, and people who take seriously this theory about Youngkin engaging in election shenanigans where he intends to remove legal voters. 100% overlap? 99.9999%? Conservatively, 99.9%%

                      Education is extremely important.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nycJ Online
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                        #15

                        As I suspected, tons of false positives. There’s a good reason you don’t do this right before an election.

                        You go, DoJ.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                        • George KG Offline
                          George KG Offline
                          George K
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #16

                          Without a passport or birth certificate, how do you prove citizenship?

                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                          CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                          • jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nycJ Online
                            jon-nyc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #17

                            Those are the only two docs I’m aware of that are available to all.

                            Honestly the federal law makes perfect sense. Sure, we need to go through exercises to keep voter rolls up to date and clean. But those processes are going to have false positives, some times a lot of them. Can’t be doing that right before an election.

                            Only non-witches get due process.

                            • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                              As I suspected, tons of false positives. There’s a good reason you don’t do this right before an election.

                              You go, DoJ.

                              HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #18

                              @jon-nyc said in Biden DOJ sues Virginia:

                              As I suspected, tons of false positives. There’s a good reason you don’t do this right before an election.

                              lol "tons". Never stated was how many non-citizens were removed successfully from the rolls, through this process. Stated clearly was the process by which any mistake could be rectified, a process which was entirely legal and limited to a time frame before the election. Theories about Youngkin doing this in order to keep legal voters from voting, remain the domain of conspiracy theorist imbeciles. His motivation is clearly to clean up the rolls.

                              Education is extremely important.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nycJ Online
                                jon-nyc
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #19

                                Had he done this in June I’d agree with you. Rectification takes time. Might require getting a copy of your birth certificate. 90 days is totally reasonable, youngkin broke the law and will lose.

                                Only non-witches get due process.

                                • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                HoraceH LuFins DadL 2 Replies Last reply
                                • MikM Away
                                  MikM Away
                                  Mik
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #20

                                  I think you are right about the outcome but I wonder two things. First, when did these registrants appear on the rolls, and second, how many of those end up voting.

                                  “I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                    Had he done this in June I’d agree with you. Rectification takes time. Might require getting a copy of your birth certificate. 90 days is totally reasonable, youngkin broke the law and will lose.

                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #21

                                    @jon-nyc said in Biden DOJ sues Virginia:

                                    Had he done this in June I’d agree with you. Rectification takes time. Might require getting a copy of your birth certificate. 90 days is totally reasonable, youngkin broke the law and will lose.

                                    Whether he broke the law depends on the wording of the federal law which defines, in precise legalese, the actions prohibited within 90 days of an election. Is it really illegal to remove illegal voters from the rolls within 90 days of an election? I doubt it. Is it illegal to employ any process intended to remove illegals but which may remove others in error? We will let the courts decide, but it is obviously not a done deal until that decision is made.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • George KG George K

                                      Without a passport or birth certificate, how do you prove citizenship?

                                      CopperC Offline
                                      CopperC Offline
                                      Copper
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #22

                                      @George-K said in Biden DOJ sues Virginia:

                                      Without a passport or birth certificate, how do you prove citizenship?

                                      A certificate of live birth, Mr. Obama for example.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                        Had he done this in June I’d agree with you. Rectification takes time. Might require getting a copy of your birth certificate. 90 days is totally reasonable, youngkin broke the law and will lose.

                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #23

                                        @jon-nyc said in Biden DOJ sues Virginia:

                                        Had he done this in June I’d agree with you. Rectification takes time. Might require getting a copy of your birth certificate. 90 days is totally reasonable, youngkin broke the law and will lose.

                                        Evidently this has been going on for months. The fact that the guy has claimed he has proven his citizenship 5 times points to the fact that this goes back to before the 90 day window.

                                        The Brad

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Online
                                          jon-nycJ Online
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                          #24

                                          Sure that’s fine. You just have to stop 90 days before the election. And they didn’t.

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups