Paul v Trump

[jon-nyc]

[LuFins Dad]

Poor timing on Paul’s part. Should have waited until November 10th. It has no chance now, but could have passed if Trump was elected, and it’s doubtful Joe would have vetoed.

[jon-nyc]

It’s hard to imagine it getting through the current house regardless of timing.

I just think it’s good that not everyone who knows better pretends not to.

[LuFins Dad]

@jon-nyc said in Paul v Trump:

It’s hard to imagine it getting through the current house regardless of timing.

I just think it’s good that not everyone who knows better pretends not to.

I think it would have passed with Dem approval.

[Axtremus]

Has Grover Norquist said anything about tariffs?