Paul v Trump
-
Poor timing on Paul’s part. Should have waited until November 10th. It has no chance now, but could have passed if Trump was elected, and it’s doubtful Joe would have vetoed.
-
-
It’s hard to imagine it getting through the current house regardless of timing.
I just think it’s good that not everyone who knows better pretends not to.
@jon-nyc said in Paul v Trump:
It’s hard to imagine it getting through the current house regardless of timing.
I just think it’s good that not everyone who knows better pretends not to.
I think it would have passed with Dem approval.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login