Dems should nominate Romney
-
-
My understanding is that it is tough to nominate someone other than Kamala (or Biden) as the Dems need to provide a name to Ohio PRIOR to the convention. Second, the $100 million for the Biden/Harris campaign would not be able to be used for another candidate and lastly, would the convention be able to finalize on him in the 4 days allotted to the convention? Michigan requires the candidates names a couple of days post the convention.
-
The Ohio legislature fixed it when they thought it didn’t mean anything because the DNC had already decided to do the virtual nomination.
Anyone can get the money as in-kind donations from the DNC. Cash can be spent in behalf of anyone, like a giant superpac.
-
Yep, the only real advantage to a Kamala ticket is using the already established ticket infrastructure. Shifting candidates would require rebuilding that infrastructure, likely using most of the elements already established, but there would need to be some overhaul and restructuring.
-
You want to beat Trump? Nominate Kennedy.
That would be fun…
If you don’t want to beat Trump, ask Bernie to run, then pool your resources to protect the Senate and go after the House.
-
@Jolly said in Dems should nominate Romney:
Sacrificial lamb?
Yeah, but they toss a bone to the radical left while giving themselves an out for going with a moderate in 2028…
-
Would Biden and Kamala have to sign off on any way for the money to be used like a PAC?
-
Would they be the leaders of the PAC?