Thomas Crooks - what we know
-
Trump signs in his yard?
Granted he lived with his parents but he’s the only republican in the house.
@jon-nyc said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
Trump signs in his yard?
Granted he lived with his parents but he’s the only republican in the house.
His dad is a Libertarian. And...You know, some Republicans split vote their ballot. Perhaps some Dems do it, too.
-
Signs were taken down months ago. Who wants to bet that one of the parents is proTrump, one is anti-Trump, and there has been strife…
-
Trump signs in his yard?
Granted he lived with his parents but he’s the only republican in the house.
@jon-nyc said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
he’s the only republican in the house.
Probably the only Democrat who registered as a Republican. That happens, you know.
ETA: As has been said before, a lot of people in PA are registered "Republicans" so that they can vote in GOP primaries - presumably for the weakest candidate.
How many "Republicans" donated to left-wing causes?
-
I heard about someone who allegedly knew him say that he was a really bad shot and was embarrassed about it. Not sure if that's true at all.
But this could be as simple as him going after the most high profile target in the world to disprove those who made fun of him.
There doesn't have to be a political explanation.
-
I heard about someone who allegedly knew him say that he was a really bad shot and was embarrassed about it. Not sure if that's true at all.
But this could be as simple as him going after the most high profile target in the world to disprove those who made fun of him.
There doesn't have to be a political explanation.
@xenon said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
I heard about someone who allegedly knew him say that he was a really bad shot and was embarrassed about it. Not sure if that's true at all.
I've seen a rumor that he was thrown off the rifle club because he was such a bad shot.
There doesn't have to be a political explanation.
That's right.
-
The Brad
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
No signs…
Fox found a neighbor that said no, Newsweek found a neighbor that said yes.
-
@LuFins-Dad said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
No signs…
Fox found a neighbor that said no, Newsweek found a neighbor that said yes.
@jon-nyc said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
@LuFins-Dad said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
No signs…
Fox found a neighbor that said no, Newsweek found a neighbor that said yes.
Fox found 2, including the local captain for the Trump team that distributes the signs and fundraises. The other is an unidentified neighbor that said they noticed it several months ago, but nothing now… :eyeroll:
-
One detects the faint whiff of hope in the air, hope against hope, that the attempted assassination of Trump can be blamed on Trump.
@Horace said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
One detects the faint whiff of hope in the air, hope against hope, that the attempted assassination of Trump can be blamed on Trump.
No, one is choking on the vast plume of hope (assumption, really) that the assassination attempt can be blamed on the outgroup’s rhetoric even though there is not yet any evidence he was caught up in that.
"You never know what worse luck your bad luck has saved you from."
-Cormac McCarthy -
I think the truth is that a sad, lonely young man made a very bad decision.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
@Mik said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
I think the truth is that a sad, lonely young man made a very bad decision.
Weird stuff. He clearly knew he would be killed - and that was at least part of his goal. He wanted to be remembered - and he achieved that as well.
-
@Horace said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
One detects the faint whiff of hope in the air, hope against hope, that the attempted assassination of Trump can be blamed on Trump.
No, one is choking on the vast plume of hope (assumption, really) that the assassination attempt can be blamed on the outgroup’s rhetoric even though there is not yet any evidence he was caught up in that.
@jon-nyc said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
@Horace said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
One detects the faint whiff of hope in the air, hope against hope, that the attempted assassination of Trump can be blamed on Trump.
No, one is choking on the vast plume of hope (assumption, really) that the assassination attempt can be blamed on the outgroup’s rhetoric even though there is not yet any evidence he was caught up in that.
There might be some projection there, as you are IMO more concerned with rhetorical talking points than most, and that concern extends to whether your out group has access to good rhetoric. Witness your wishcasting about a piece of glass hitting Trump rather than a bullet.
It’s not even that important what motivated a single arbitrarily crazy person to do something. The social effect of the rhetoric we are all surrounded with can hardly be judged by that, one way or another. We can each hold our own truths about whether the best of us express our goodness, and discernment of evil, with edgier and edgier hatred and disgust for Trump and his supporters. But the scent of the TDS patients is not quite as rosy as it once was.
-
A more meaningful social datapoint might be observed in such things as MSNBC preemptively gagging its mainstream left talking heads, to prevent them from saying what we all know is in their hearts.
Witness your wishcasting about a piece of glass hitting Trump rather than a bullet.
George posted that. Minutes later I just reminded you we still don’t know what happened.
Want wishcasting? How many different people have helpfully reminded us that, even though he’s a registered republican, maybe his heart wasn’t in it.
-
Witness your wishcasting about a piece of glass hitting Trump rather than a bullet.
George posted that. Minutes later I just reminded you we still don’t know what happened.
Want wishcasting? How many different people have helpfully reminded us that, even though he’s a registered republican, maybe his heart wasn’t in it.
@jon-nyc said in Thomas Crooks - what we know:
Witness your wishcasting about a piece of glass hitting Trump rather than a bullet.
George posted that. Minutes later I just reminded you we still don’t know what happened.
George posted as a curiosity and you became invested in it, because the rhetorical difference between “shot” and “hit by broken glass from a ricochet” was important to you. Nobody forced you to think of that as important.
Want wishcasting? How many different people have helpfully reminded us that, even though he’s a registered republican, maybe his heart wasn’t in it.
His motivation, the motivation of a kid of some arbitrarily minimal connection to reason and reality, does not form the basis of much of anything. Other than rhetoric. Some people are more heavily invested in rhetoric than others. Jan 6 insurrection much?
-
@jon-nyc If Trump is “literally Hitler”, don’t you have a moral obligation to stop him any way possible?
The Brad
