Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss
-
Sen. Mitt Romney (R-UT) slammed his fellow Republicans for showing up at Donald Trump’s porn star hush money trial this week in fiery comments to CNN’s Manu Raju on Wednesday.
Raju reported that Romney told him, “I think it’s a little demeaning to show up in front of the courthouse — and particularly one where we’re talking about an allegation of paying a porn star. And it’s really, really very difficult to watch.”
EDIT TO ADD:
read://https_thehill.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fsenate%2F4665313-murkowski-knocks-senate-republicans-trump-trial%2F
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) reportedly went after fellow members of her party who have attended former President Trump’s hush money trial in New York.
“Do we have something to do around here other than watch a stupid porn trial? I mean, this is ridiculous,” the Alaska Republican said Tuesday,
-
Wasn't it Bill Maher who said (I think I posted the link) that any time you see the word "shreds" (or "owns," or "destroys") in the headline of a story, stop reading.
And, Romney's complaining about a bimbo eruption - remember that term? - and this case is not about that. If I were Johnson, would I have shown up? Probably not. But to make an issue of it is silly.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
Wasn't it Bill Maher who said (I think I posted the link) that any time you see the word "shreds" (or "owns," or "destroys") in the headline of a story, stop reading.
And, Romney's complaining about a bimbo eruption - remember that term? - and this case is not about that. If I were Johnson, would I have shown up? Probably not. But to make an issue of it is silly.
@George-K said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
But to make an issue of it is silly.
He is not the only one. (See my edit above).
Even a recent Chicago Tribune editorial (which I think is somewhat conservative) said the same thing.
-
Wasn't it Bill Maher who said (I think I posted the link) that any time you see the word "shreds" (or "owns," or "destroys") in the headline of a story, stop reading.
And, Romney's complaining about a bimbo eruption - remember that term? - and this case is not about that. If I were Johnson, would I have shown up? Probably not. But to make an issue of it is silly.
If I were Johnson, would I have shown up? Probably not.
That was my initial knee jerk reaction as well. However after a little reflection, I believe it was an astute move on Johnson’s part.
Trump for good or bad has been supportive of Johnson over the attempts by the GOP trailer trash faction led by MTG to oust him as Speaker. Johnson attending the trial shows Party unity and isolates the reactionaries. In other words, better Johnson there than MTG or a few others.
-
@George-K said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
But to make an issue of it is silly.
He is not the only one. (See my edit above).
Even a recent Chicago Tribune editorial (which I think is somewhat conservative) said the same thing.
@taiwan_girl said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
Chicago Tribune editorial (which I think is
somewhatused to be conservative)Not to derail, but one of the reasons John Kass left the Trib was because of its leftward drift.
-
-
I mean, come on.
The House Oversight and Accountability Committee shuffled its schedule, bumping a hearing to hold Merrick Garland in contempt of Congress so some of its members could instead attend former President Trump’s hush money trial.
The panel was set to meet early Thursday, an hour after a twin resolution censuring Garland would likewise be considered by the House Judiciary Committee. Instead, it will now meet at 8 p.m. so numerous Republicans who sit on the panel — including Freedom Caucus members — could attend the trial.
A source confirmed to The Hill that the last-minute shift was to allow the lawmakers to make the trip to New York
-
J.D. Vance wasn’t just some hillbilly after all
His journey from author to Trumpist senator is a fable for the GOP’s devolution.[J. D. Vance's book] “Hillbilly Elegy” was embraced on the right for its indictment of cultural decay and its call to self-reliance; it was lauded on the left because it offered an explanation as to why good people would gravitate toward someone as reprehensible as Trump. That’s not my word, by the way — it was Vance’s, who called himself a Never Trumper at the time and warned Christian voters: “When we apologize for this man, Lord help us.”
... By 2022, when [Vance] ran for the open seat left by retiring Sen. Rob Portman, Vance had gone from Never Trump to Long Live the King; his conversion included a spirited embrace of Trump’s stolen-election nonsense. His financier in that race was billionaire Peter Thiel, who had also bankrolled Trump in 2016.
Now Vance is gunning to be Trump’s running mate, which is why he bravely waded through the leftist filth of Manhattan to show his fealty. ... -
Trump-backed Republican platform tempers language on abortion
...
The platform, a basic statement of policy principles, takes Trump’s position that the issue of abortion now is one to be determined by individual states. It makes no mention of a federal ban or protecting a fetus as a person under the U.S. Constitution – tenets that have been included in past platforms and were demanded by a cadre of influential evangelicals. -
Trump is pushing falsehoods. Some Republicans are worried about the fallout.
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/11/trump-disinformation-immigrants-storm-00183378
Donald Trump is relying more than ever on easily debunked and often bizarre conspiracy theories and rumors — often to the frustration of even his fellow Republicans.
In the final weeks of the campaign, the former president has been toggling between outlandish claims about Haitians and other migrants, false descriptions of the federal response to recent hurricanes and incorrect statistics about the economy and crime.
Lots of examples of Republicans debunking various falsehoods pushed by Trump.
-
Recent on the record comments by John Kelly
Among other things, Kelly has said Trump made favorable comments about Adolf Hitler, denigrated disabled veterans and argued Trump would rule like a dictator if returned to the White House. The Atlantic magazine also reported that Trump had expressed disdain for the military.
and
"He certainly prefers the dictator approach to government," "Certainly the former president is in the far-right area, he's certainly an authoritarian, admires people who are dictators - he has said that. So he certainly falls into the general definition of fascist, for sure."
And in typical President Trump fashion, his response was:
“John Kelly is a LOWLIFE, and a bad General, whose advice in the White House I no longer sought,
I know we have talked about this before, but it amazes me that so so many people who worked very very closely with President Trump have such a negative opinion of him, yet President Trump still is held up as this beacon of greatness by quite a few people.
-
Senator McConnell speaks:
In the minority leader's quotes revealed in the book, he doesn't hold back, reportedly slamming Trump as "stupid," "erratic," a "despicable human being," and a "narcissist."
and
In the weeks after the 2020 presidential election and before the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot, McConnell said, "It’s not just the Democrats who are counting the days" until Trump is no longer president.
He further praised the "good judgment of the American people" for voting Trump out in 2020.
"They’ve had just enough of the misrepresentations, the outright lies almost on a daily basis, and they fired him," he said, according to the excerpt.
McConnell additionally blamed Trump for the House Republicans losing the majority in the lower chamber in the 2018 midterm elections. He "has every characteristic you would not want a president to have," he said.
:woman-facepalming: Please explain how President Trump is beloved by 30-40% of the US public?
-
Don't look now, but it looks like he's outperforming 2016 and 2020.
-
@Jolly I have predicted he will win the president, but my simple mind is baffled as to how this is the case. LOL
-
I think I would still be baffled.
If I went up to people and gave them an anonymous description of President Trumps characteristics and history of comments and actions, and then asked them
would you want this person to babysit your kids/grandkids?
would you want this person to date your daughter/granddaughter?
would you want to be a contractor for his business with payment after completion?
do you trust him to tell you the truth?
do you trust him to keep his word?
would you want to work for him?
do you think he cares about you and your family?
would you want him handling your money?
etc.How many "yes" answers do you think I would get?
-
People aren't voting for him for any of the above jobs. Well, I guess in a way he is handling our money, and his voters do seem to have conviction that their money is in better hands with Trump than Kamala.
Yes, I suspect his voters believe he cares, in the abstract, about their families. He has convinced them of that, maybe more so than Kamala has convinced them of that, even as she reminds them for the millionth time that she, too, grew up in a middle class family.
Just for the record, did you believe that Kamala "cares about you and your family"? Does that heavily inform your voting preference? Should Kamala make an even greater effort to convince the country that she cares? Does that make for a better politician and leader, or is the presidency more of a thinking person's game after all, rather than a feeling person's?
I suspect the great majority of contractors who've ever worked for a Trump owned business have, in fact, gotten paid. I don't choose to live in fun narratives where Trump is a super villain who never tells the truth and always cheats in everything. That is more Tim "big fat liar" Walz territory.
-
People aren't voting for him for any of the above jobs. Well, I guess in a way he is handling our money, and his voters do seem to have conviction that their money is in better hands with Trump than Kamala.
Yes, I suspect his voters believe he cares, in the abstract, about their families. He has convinced them of that, maybe more so than Kamala has convinced them of that, even as she reminds them for the millionth time that she, too, grew up in a middle class family.
Just for the record, did you believe that Kamala "cares about you and your family"? Does that heavily inform your voting preference? Should Kamala make an even greater effort to convince the country that she cares? Does that make for a better politician and leader, or is the presidency more of a thinking person's game after all, rather than a feeling person's?
I suspect the great majority of contractors who've ever worked for a Trump owned business have, in fact, gotten paid. I don't choose to live in fun narratives where Trump is a super villain who never tells the truth and always cheats in everything. That is more Tim "big fat liar" Walz territory.
I will preface that I think VP Harris is a terrible candidate. The two major parties are running Loser #1 and Loser #2.
@Horace said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
Just for the record, did you believe that Kamala "cares about you and your family"?
More than President Trump for sure. The only person President Trump cares about is himself and I think he would "sell me down the river" if it would help himself.
@Horace said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
Does that heavily inform your voting preference?
See my note above. I think the fact that President Trump puts himself above everything and I believe that all his decisions take that into account. I am not sure it is a conscious thing, but it is there. If a decision is good for him, but bad for the rest of the country, he will choose himself.
@Horace said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
Should Kamala make an even greater effort to convince the country that she cares?
Doesn't matter at this point. Her cooking hamburgers at a barbecue or President Trump "working" a shift a McDonalds does not make me think either are more "in touch" with me.
@Horace said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
Does that make for a better politician and leader, or is the presidency more of a thinking person's game after all, rather than a feeling person's?
Both are important. It is not a "binary" choice. Having zero of one or the other is not a good thing.
@Horace said in Whither the GOP post Trump 2020 election loss:
I don't choose to live in fun narratives where Trump is a super villain who never tells the truth and always cheats in everything.
Based on an obviously outside view, do you think that President Trump is at the norm of people in this regard or above/below the norm?
