This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict

[Mik]

"Hunter Biden's attorney sought to cast doubt on the government's narrative during his opening statement, claiming that Hunter Biden was not actively using drugs at the time of his gun purchase and therefore did not "knowingly" lie on the federal form barring drug users from procuring a firearm.

"He did not knowingly violate these laws," attorney Abbe Lowell said, since there was "nothing on the form about the definition of a user."

Lowell told the jury that Hunter Biden was using alcohol at the time of the gun purchase, but that his drug use "did not start until later.""

Assuming there is no evidence he was actively using right around that time, give or take a week or two, there is some credibility to that claim. What I would call cocaine addiction is largely while you are under the influence, and goes away once you have come down. At least until you start again. While it's enormously strong at the time, it's not like opiates where you must dose every day to avoid withdrawal symptoms.

That shit turns everyone into animals.

[George K]

No reasonable prosecutor…

[Mik]

The knowingly thing bothers me, as we've been told here that mens rea is not crucial to criminal prosecutions. I was taught that the intent to commit a crime is very important. I don't see why he should get that benefit of teh doubt when others do not.

[George K]

Seen on X:

“ Federal prosecutors just entered Hunter Biden's laptop as evidence in the case against him

Remember when the entire media, the intel community, and his father told us all it was fake in 2020 and Twitter censored anyone talking about it?

Really makes you think”

[jon-nyc]

If he gets an innocent verdict through good legal representation I have no problem with that.

If he gets it because of some juror’s loyalty to his father, that’s another thing all together.

[Jolly]

@jon-nyc said in This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict:

If he gets an innocent verdict through good legal representation I have no problem with that.

If he gets it because of some juror’s loyalty to his father, that’s another thing all together.

You mean the juror whose spouse works for the secret service or the other five jurors who have had drug problems in their family?

[George K]

@Jolly said in This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict:

You mean the juror whose spouse works for the secret service or the other five jurors who have had drug problems in their family?

Not quite right.

[Doctor Phibes]

You chaps seem to be preparing yourselves for a huge miscarriage of justice

[jon-nyc]

@Jolly said in This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict:

@jon-nyc said in This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict:

If he gets an innocent verdict through good legal representation I have no problem with that.

If he gets it because of some juror’s loyalty to his father, that’s another thing all together.

You mean the juror whose spouse works for the secret service or the other five jurors who have had drug problems in their family?

It could be any of the 12, you never really know.

[Jolly]

@Doctor-Phibes said in This is how Hunter gets not guilty verdict:

You chaps seem to be preparing yourselves for a huge miscarriage of justice

Hope not. The case should be a slam dunk.

Having said that, these cases typically do not result in jail time, unless there are other charges.

I think Hunter is so dirty, he's oily. I think he probably needs to go to jail for influence peddling.

But no incarceration for this charge.

[Copper]

Apparently it is impossible to find a juror in Delaware that doesn't have a relationship with the Biden Crime Family.