Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Police State

Police State

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
148 Posts 14 Posters 3.7k Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Loki

    The so called Police State had another “uneventful” evening of peaceful protesters building a campfire to stay warm I suppose.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/07/19/portland-police-declare-saturday-night-protests-riot/5467736002/

    JollyJ Offline
    JollyJ Offline
    Jolly
    wrote on last edited by
    #24

    @Loki said in Police State:

    The so called Police State had another “uneventful” evening of peaceful protesters building a campfire to stay warm I suppose.

    https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/07/19/portland-police-declare-saturday-night-protests-riot/5467736002/

    Heard a Portland cop interviewed on the radio this morning. He was leaving as fast as he could find another job.

    He talked about one smaller city in the geographical area, where he had an application in and was hoping to land the job...Less money, much lower stress.

    The problem with an exodus from the department, is that the only thing they will have left is old guys waiting on their pension, and will do the minimum to try to keep their jobs, and the young idiots who nobody else wants.

    That does not make for a good police force.

    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

    1 Reply Last reply
    • JollyJ Jolly

      You mean the folks peacefully rioting?

      AxtremusA Offline
      AxtremusA Offline
      Axtremus
      wrote on last edited by
      #25

      @Jolly said in Police State:

      You mean the folks peacefully rioting?

      No warrant, no probable cause.
      Just random people snatched off the streets.
      By unidentified armed forces.
      Think about it.

      LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG George K

        Remember the good old days when the governor of a state asked for federal intervention because a farmer "occupied" federal lands?

        Good times, eh?

        AxtremusA Offline
        AxtremusA Offline
        Axtremus
        wrote on last edited by
        #26

        @George-K said in Police State:

        Remember the good old days when the governor of a state asked for federal intervention because a farmer "occupied" federal lands?

        Good times, eh?

        Good intentioned cooperation between state/local government with the federal government; times were indeed better then.

        Today, federal forces just barge in despite local/state government’s objection.

        No warrant, no probable cause.
        Just random people snatched off the streets.
        By unidentified armed forces.
        Think about it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • George KG George K

          The people wearing masks are complaining about unmarked cars.

          Got it.

          AxtremusA Offline
          AxtremusA Offline
          Axtremus
          wrote on last edited by
          #27

          @George-K said in Police State:

          The people wearing masks are complaining about unmarked cars.

          Got it.

          No warrant, no probable cause.
          Just random people snatched off the streets.
          By unidentified armed forces.
          Think about it.

          1 Reply Last reply
          • RainmanR Offline
            RainmanR Offline
            Rainman
            wrote on last edited by
            #28

            Atta Boy, Ax 'ol buddy!
            You show 'em.
            They're all dumb.
            You and me, man. We are the genious ones!
            If they'd only listen. Know what I mean?

            1 Reply Last reply
            • HoraceH Offline
              HoraceH Offline
              Horace
              wrote on last edited by
              #29

              I suspect that somewhere in the backs of their mind, those sympathetic to the mindlessly destructive forces of the left realize that these things do not come for free. Maybe Ax is right to fear retribution against his political tribe.

              Education is extremely important.

              1 Reply Last reply
              • Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3C Offline
                Catseye3
                wrote on last edited by
                #30

                From The Guardian (Excerpted): "The Trump administration has been consulting the former government lawyer who wrote the legal justification for waterboarding on how the president might try to rule by decree.

                "John Yoo told the Guardian he has been talking to White House officials about his view that a recent supreme court ruling on immigration would allow Trump to issue executive orders on whether to apply existing federal laws.

                “If the court really believes what it just did, then it just handed President Trump a great deal of power, too,” Yoo said.

                “The supreme court has said President Obama could [choose not to] enforce immigration laws for about 2 million cases. And why can’t the Trump administration . . . create its own program, in areas [like] inner city policy. I talked to them about cities, because of the disorder.

                "Constitutional scholars and human rights activists have also pointed to the deployment of paramilitary federal forces against protesters in Portland as a sign that Trump is ready to use this broad interpretation of presidential powers as a means to suppress basic constitutional rights.

                "As an example of what Trump might achieve, Yoo suggested the president could declare a national right to carry firearms openly, in conflict with many state laws.

                “He could declare that he would not enforce federal firearms laws,” Yoo wrote, “and that a new ‘Trump permit’ would free any holder of state and local gun-control restrictions.

                “Even if Trump knew that his scheme lacked legal authority, he could get away with it for the length of his presidency,” he said.

                More: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jul/20/trump-john-yoo-lawyer-torture-waterboarding

                Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                1 Reply Last reply
                • L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Loki
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #31

                  Moms and Dads were marching last in Portland.

                  We’ve come a long way from the 60’s “Don’t trust anyone over 30”.

                  Actually I don’t think the rioters (PNW Youth Liberation Front) are gonna like it.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                    @Jolly said in Police State:

                    You mean the folks peacefully rioting?

                    No warrant, no probable cause.
                    Just random people snatched off the streets.
                    By unidentified armed forces.
                    Think about it.

                    LarryL Offline
                    LarryL Offline
                    Larry
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #32

                    @Axtremus said in Police State:

                    @Jolly said in Police State:

                    You mean the folks peacefully rioting?

                    No warrant, no probable cause.
                    Just random people snatched off the streets.
                    By unidentified armed forces.
                    Think about it.

                    Didn't need a warrant because they most definitely DID have probable cause.
                    They weren't just random people, they were each and everyone had been witnessed destroying property, the feds followed them until they were not in the crowd, and then captured them.
                    They weren't unidentified, every single one of them had an insignia on their uniform.

                    What I am thinking about is how gullible you are, to swallow every lie you get told if it comes from the Left. You are the perfect useful idiot.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • LarryL Offline
                      LarryL Offline
                      Larry
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #33

                      It's time to start shooting real bullets at these son's of bitches. And it's time to stop referring to them as protesters. Peaceful or otherwise. They are anarchists. They need to be given the same choice any enemy is given - surrender or die.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nycJ Offline
                        jon-nyc
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #34

                        Read the whole thread.

                        Only non-witches get due process.

                        • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nycJ Offline
                          jon-nyc
                          wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                          #35

                          SecDef concerned about Trump’s thugs dressing like soldiers.

                          https://www.politico.com/news/2020/07/21/esper-federal-agents-military-protests-376381

                          Only non-witches get due process.

                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Offline
                            HoraceH Offline
                            Horace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #36

                            Terrifying.

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • LarryL Offline
                              LarryL Offline
                              Larry
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #37

                              Utter bull shit, Jon.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              • LarryL Offline
                                LarryL Offline
                                Larry
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #38

                                https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/508227-lets-stop-the-nonsense-about-federal-agents-in-portland

                                There have been conflicting reports about federal agents in camouflage and unmarked vehicles detaining protesters in Portland, Ore., without cause. This comes on the heels of scenes of federal officers, outfitted in blue shirts and tactical vests but no official patches or badges, protecting facilities in Washington, D.C., in June. The events have called into question the role of federal law enforcement and how it intersects with traditional policing.

                                While many federal law enforcement agencies are investigative in nature and have special agents, not police officers, some do have a more traditional police role. The Secret Service Uniformed Division has been in operation since 1922 and provides traditional law enforcement services around the White House and foreign embassies in the U.S. Its agents conduct operations around the president and other dignitaries, including K-9, explosive ordnance disposal, and counter-assault teams. The Capitol Police is approximately 1,500 police officers strong and functions much like a traditional police department. Many other agencies have uniformed police officers as well, including the FBI, whose police officers protect the agency’s headquarters, FBI Academy in Quantico, Va., and its enormous field offices in Washington and New York.

                                But recent videos of federal agents in Portland detaining suspects has sparked debate, and critics of President Trump and Attorney General William Barr are making analogies to secret military operations and private armies. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said “they are snatching people off the street with no underlying justification.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) referred to federal agents in Portland as “Stormtroopers” in a tweet. Said Juan Chavez, director of the civil rights project at the Oregon Justice Resource Center: “It’s like stop and frisk meets Guantanamo Bay.” This is nonsense.

                                The federal building and courthouse in Portland have been under assault by demonstrators for more than two weeks. In addition to the “mere graffiti” that opponents of the federal response have pointed to, there has been substantial damage to windows and doors; protesters have attempted to set fire to the facility; and federal agents attempting to stop the violence have been assaulted while the protestors blind them with laser lights. Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler has sided with the protesters and told Portland police to back down. Last week he told the acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf to send the federal agents away.

                                jon-nycJ 1 Reply Last reply
                                • LarryL Larry

                                  https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/508227-lets-stop-the-nonsense-about-federal-agents-in-portland

                                  There have been conflicting reports about federal agents in camouflage and unmarked vehicles detaining protesters in Portland, Ore., without cause. This comes on the heels of scenes of federal officers, outfitted in blue shirts and tactical vests but no official patches or badges, protecting facilities in Washington, D.C., in June. The events have called into question the role of federal law enforcement and how it intersects with traditional policing.

                                  While many federal law enforcement agencies are investigative in nature and have special agents, not police officers, some do have a more traditional police role. The Secret Service Uniformed Division has been in operation since 1922 and provides traditional law enforcement services around the White House and foreign embassies in the U.S. Its agents conduct operations around the president and other dignitaries, including K-9, explosive ordnance disposal, and counter-assault teams. The Capitol Police is approximately 1,500 police officers strong and functions much like a traditional police department. Many other agencies have uniformed police officers as well, including the FBI, whose police officers protect the agency’s headquarters, FBI Academy in Quantico, Va., and its enormous field offices in Washington and New York.

                                  But recent videos of federal agents in Portland detaining suspects has sparked debate, and critics of President Trump and Attorney General William Barr are making analogies to secret military operations and private armies. Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said “they are snatching people off the street with no underlying justification.” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) referred to federal agents in Portland as “Stormtroopers” in a tweet. Said Juan Chavez, director of the civil rights project at the Oregon Justice Resource Center: “It’s like stop and frisk meets Guantanamo Bay.” This is nonsense.

                                  The federal building and courthouse in Portland have been under assault by demonstrators for more than two weeks. In addition to the “mere graffiti” that opponents of the federal response have pointed to, there has been substantial damage to windows and doors; protesters have attempted to set fire to the facility; and federal agents attempting to stop the violence have been assaulted while the protestors blind them with laser lights. Portland Mayor Ted Wheeler has sided with the protesters and told Portland police to back down. Last week he told the acting Homeland Security Secretary Chad Wolf to send the federal agents away.

                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nycJ Offline
                                  jon-nyc
                                  wrote on last edited by jon-nyc
                                  #39

                                  @Larry said in Police State:

                                  . Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said “they are snatching people off the street with no underlying justification.”

                                  And the deputy director of the force confirmed it yesterday.

                                  By the way, if all they were doing is beefing up security around federal building I’d have no problems with it.

                                  Only non-witches get due process.

                                  • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                  LarryL 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • Catseye3C Offline
                                    Catseye3C Offline
                                    Catseye3
                                    wrote on last edited by Catseye3
                                    #40

                                    Also from the article that Jon cited: "Trump threatened to send additional agents into other major cities, including New York City and Philadelphia, if the "liberal Democrats" in charge don't tamp down on civil unrest."

                                    When you combine this with the Guardian article excerpts I posted yesterday, it forms a disturbing thought picture. Whether the actions contemplated there come to pass, it is, how shall I say, scary but not surprising. But scary.

                                    Edited to Add: From today's CNN headlines: "The strange and frightening images of unidentified military-looking men taking protesters off the streets of Portland, Oregon, and into unmarked vans may be headed to a city near you if that city is, as President Donald Trump declared Monday, run by "liberal Democrats."

                                    This is . . . not a good look for a country that's supposed to be an open society. And it's particularly distressing that the President is openly threatening cities based on the political affiliations of their leaders.

                                    "The teams of masked authorities seen in Portland dressed up for war like special forces apparently belong to the Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border Protection Unit . . . they've been dispatched to American streets."

                                    Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka

                                    LarryL 2 Replies Last reply
                                    • jon-nycJ jon-nyc

                                      @Larry said in Police State:

                                      . Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said “they are snatching people off the street with no underlying justification.”

                                      And the deputy director of the force confirmed it yesterday.

                                      By the way, if all they were doing is beefing up security around federal building I’d have no problems with it.

                                      LarryL Offline
                                      LarryL Offline
                                      Larry
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #41

                                      @jon-nyc said in Police State:

                                      @Larry said in Police State:

                                      . Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) said “they are snatching people off the street with no underlying justification.”

                                      And the deputy director of the force confirmed it yesterday.

                                      By the way, if all they were doing is beefing up security around federal building I’d have no problems with it.

                                      So I disproved all your claims but one and you're clinging to that one by the skin on your teeth.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • Catseye3C Catseye3

                                        Also from the article that Jon cited: "Trump threatened to send additional agents into other major cities, including New York City and Philadelphia, if the "liberal Democrats" in charge don't tamp down on civil unrest."

                                        When you combine this with the Guardian article excerpts I posted yesterday, it forms a disturbing thought picture. Whether the actions contemplated there come to pass, it is, how shall I say, scary but not surprising. But scary.

                                        Edited to Add: From today's CNN headlines: "The strange and frightening images of unidentified military-looking men taking protesters off the streets of Portland, Oregon, and into unmarked vans may be headed to a city near you if that city is, as President Donald Trump declared Monday, run by "liberal Democrats."

                                        This is . . . not a good look for a country that's supposed to be an open society. And it's particularly distressing that the President is openly threatening cities based on the political affiliations of their leaders.

                                        "The teams of masked authorities seen in Portland dressed up for war like special forces apparently belong to the Department of Homeland Security's Customs and Border Protection Unit . . . they've been dispatched to American streets."

                                        LarryL Offline
                                        LarryL Offline
                                        Larry
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #42

                                        @Catseye3 said in Police State:

                                        Also from the article that Jon cited: "Trump threatened to send additional agents into other major cities, including New York City and Philadelphia, if the "liberal Democrats" in charge don't tamp down on civil unrest."

                                        When you combine this with the Guardian article excerpts I posted yesterday, it forms a disturbing thought picture. Whether the actions contemplated there come to pass, it is, how shall I say, scary but not surprising. But scary.

                                        That's his job. It's time to start killing them. Kill a few and you'll see the problem end in ten minutes.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        • jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nycJ Offline
                                          jon-nyc
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #43

                                          What claims did I make? Can you link to them?

                                          Only non-witches get due process.

                                          • Cotton Mather, Salem Massachusetts, 1692
                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups