Apollo 11 vs the USB Charger
-
-
"Compared to that, Anker’s $49 USB charger has one of Cypress Semiconductor’s CYPD4225 USB-C microcontrollers, which is based on a Cortex-M0 CPU running at 48 MHz. Right off the bat, the USB charger enjoys nearly a 48× improvement in clock speed. More significant, however, is the fact that Cortex-M0 executes most instructions in a single cycle, not dozens of cycles like the AGC. Assuming that ARM instructions are more or less equivalent to AGC instructions – and they are – that works out to well over a 500:1 ratio in performance. "
OK, now that's just showing off.
-
@jon-nyc said in Apollo 11 vs the USB Charger:
https://www.eejournal.com/article/apollo-11-vs-the-usb-charger/
Here's a portmanteau I'd never seen before:
"Strewth"
-
Funnily enough, I've frequently used the word 'strewth', but didn't know what a portmanteau was until today.
-
@jon-nyc said in Apollo 11 vs the USB Charger:
https://www.eejournal.com/article/apollo-11-vs-the-usb-charger/
Here's a portmanteau I'd never seen before:
"Strewth"
@George-K said in Apollo 11 vs the USB Charger:
@jon-nyc said in Apollo 11 vs the USB Charger:
https://www.eejournal.com/article/apollo-11-vs-the-usb-charger/
Here's a portmanteau I'd never seen before:
"Strewth"
"Struth" is usually how I've seen it. It's very common in Oz.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login