Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Mr. Trump back on the ballot.

Mr. Trump back on the ballot.

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
33 Posts 9 Posters 326 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • George KG Offline
    George KG Offline
    George K
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Good.

    Because our democracy is at stake, right?

    "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

    The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • CopperC Offline
      CopperC Offline
      Copper
      wrote on last edited by Copper
      #3

      JUSTICE BARRETT, concurring in part and concurring in the judgment.

      All nine Justices agree on the outcome of this case. That is the message Americans should take home.

      1 Reply Last reply
      • George KG Offline
        George KG Offline
        George K
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Someone had to...

        image.jpeg

        "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

        The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

        1 Reply Last reply
        • JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          9-0. With a very early release. About as slam-dunk as the court gets.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          George KG 1 Reply Last reply
          • JollyJ Jolly

            9-0. With a very early release. About as slam-dunk as the court gets.

            George KG Offline
            George KG Offline
            George K
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            @Jolly said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

            9-0. With a very early release. About as slam-dunk as the court gets.

            What other issues wrt Trump are still pending before SCOTUS?

            "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

            The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

            1 Reply Last reply
            • George KG Offline
              George KG Offline
              George K
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              GH1oBbdbcAAFnD-.jpeg

              "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

              The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

              LuFins DadL 1 Reply Last reply
              • HoraceH Offline
                HoraceH Offline
                Horace
                wrote on last edited by Horace
                #8

                So, by what process would an insurrectionist be barred from federal office? If a state can't take it upon itself to remove an insurrectionist from a federal election ballot, at what point in the process is an insurrectionist blocked from the presidency?

                Education is extremely important.

                CopperC JollyJ 2 Replies Last reply
                • HoraceH Horace

                  So, by what process would an insurrectionist be barred from federal office? If a state can't take it upon itself to remove an insurrectionist from a federal election ballot, at what point in the process is an insurrectionist blocked from the presidency?

                  CopperC Offline
                  CopperC Offline
                  Copper
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  @Horace said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                  at what point in the process is an insurrectionist blocked

                  At the point when the US congress blocks him/her.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • 89th8 Offline
                    89th8 Offline
                    89th
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    Basically.

                    @Horace if you had taken the time to actually read the decision like a dedicated American, you would've clearly seen on Page 18, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson said:

                    Section 3 provides that when an oathbreaking insurrectionist is disqualified, “Congress may by a vote of twothirds of each House, remove such disability.”

                    HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                    • 89th8 Offline
                      89th8 Offline
                      89th
                      wrote on last edited by 89th
                      #11

                      (I skimmed the doc and found that part... it wasn't very clear, but I haven't read Section 3 because I'm not a dedicated American either)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • CopperC Offline
                        CopperC Offline
                        Copper
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        I read the whole thing, spell-checked it, and verified the cross-references before I posted the link.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        • 89th8 89th

                          Basically.

                          @Horace if you had taken the time to actually read the decision like a dedicated American, you would've clearly seen on Page 18, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson said:

                          Section 3 provides that when an oathbreaking insurrectionist is disqualified, “Congress may by a vote of twothirds of each House, remove such disability.”

                          HoraceH Offline
                          HoraceH Offline
                          Horace
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          @89th said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                          Basically.

                          @Horace if you had taken the time to actually read the decision like a dedicated American, you would've clearly seen on Page 18, Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson said:

                          Section 3 provides that when an oathbreaking insurrectionist is disqualified, “Congress may by a vote of twothirds of each House, remove such disability.”

                          I’m sorry my friend but your reading comprehension in this case is regrettable. That describes a process by which an insurrectionist can be allowed to be president. It does not describe the process by which one can be blocked from the presidency.

                          Education is extremely important.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          • HoraceH Offline
                            HoraceH Offline
                            Horace
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            Anyway I’ll read it. My answer is probably somewhere there. To the extent an answer exists beyond various legal opinions about what the answer is.

                            Education is extremely important.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            • HoraceH Offline
                              HoraceH Offline
                              Horace
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              I guess it’s the same process by which a 5 year old would be barred from the presidency. Which is…

                              Education is extremely important.

                              CopperC 1 Reply Last reply
                              • HoraceH Horace

                                I guess it’s the same process by which a 5 year old would be barred from the presidency. Which is…

                                CopperC Offline
                                CopperC Offline
                                Copper
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                @Horace said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                                I guess it’s the same process by which a 5 year old would be barred from the presidency. Which is…

                                The Hawaiian Birth Certificate for people who have a Kenyan Birth Certificate.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                • AxtremusA Offline
                                  AxtremusA Offline
                                  Axtremus
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  From SCOTUS' opinion:

                                  Responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the states, ... The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand.

                                  HoraceH 1 Reply Last reply
                                  • AxtremusA Axtremus

                                    From SCOTUS' opinion:

                                    Responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the states, ... The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand.

                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    HoraceH Offline
                                    Horace
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    @Axtremus said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                                    From SCOTUS' opinion:

                                    Responsibility for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates rests with Congress and not the states, ... The judgment of the Colorado Supreme Court therefore cannot stand.

                                    still not exactly clear. Congress would pass a law barring a specific insurrectionist from holding office? I know they can impeach, but that would be after the insurrectionist takes office.

                                    Education is extremely important.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    • HoraceH Offline
                                      HoraceH Offline
                                      Horace
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      it is therefore necessary o “‘ascertain[] what particular individuals are insurrectionists".

                                      “[t]o accomplish this ascertainment and ensure effective results, proceedings, evidence, decisions, and enforcements of decisions, more or less formal, are indispensable.”

                                      For its part, the Colorado Supreme Court also concluded that there must be some kind of “determination” that Section 3 applies to a particular person “before the disqualification holds meaning.”

                                      The Constitution empowers Congress to prescribe how those determinations should be made. The relevant provision is Section 5, which enables Congress, subject of course
                                      to judicial review, to pass “appropriate legislation” to “enforce” the Fourteenth Amendment.

                                      So there you have it, congress has to pass legislation barring certain individuals or groups, who have been found to be insurrectionists by some formal process. Congressional hearings and whatnot. Maybe the Jan 6 committee and its excellently formal proceedings would come into play here.

                                      Anyway, anybody on the "he's an insurrectionist" bandwagon is bound to conclude that congress must do its job here, and keep him from the presidency. Most of those who enjoy calling him an insurrectionist would gladly conclude that, but some incoherent few would not.

                                      Education is extremely important.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      • George KG George K

                                        GH1oBbdbcAAFnD-.jpeg

                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins DadL Offline
                                        LuFins Dad
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        @George-K said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                                        GH1oBbdbcAAFnD-.jpeg

                                        Evidently, he is so upset about this, he’s lost control of his bladder.

                                        The Brad

                                        George KG 1 Reply Last reply
                                        • LuFins DadL LuFins Dad

                                          @George-K said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                                          GH1oBbdbcAAFnD-.jpeg

                                          Evidently, he is so upset about this, he’s lost control of his bladder.

                                          George KG Offline
                                          George KG Offline
                                          George K
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          @LuFins-Dad said in Mr. Trump back on the ballot.:

                                          Evidently, he is so upset about this, he’s lost control of his bladder.

                                          Someone commented that Keith Olbermann's career arc over the last 20 years is really something to behold.

                                          GH1zYXsbYAUBiXC.jpeg

                                          "Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08

                                          The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups