Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse

The New Coffee Room

  1. TNCR
  2. General Discussion
  3. Trump fine GoFundMe

Trump fine GoFundMe

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved General Discussion
64 Posts 12 Posters 892 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 89th8 89th

    @Horace said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

    @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

    The question was whether anyone besides Trump has been tried in NY for falsifying business documents and gaining money from the fraud.

    So, it's your contention that anybody here thinks nobody has ever been prosecuted for falsifying documents and gaining money from fraud?

    It's not more reasonable to try to understand the actual claims being made? Just dunk on an obviously absurd claim that one would have to be a moron to believe?

    I was just replying to this request:

    fecf42a3-34b3-4750-96bb-043748daed77-image.png

    We're all better than that here

    Speak for yourself! I am certainly not above a literal reply.

    HoraceH Offline
    HoraceH Offline
    Horace
    wrote on last edited by
    #54

    @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

    @Horace said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

    @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

    The question was whether anyone besides Trump has been tried in NY for falsifying business documents and gaining money from the fraud.

    So, it's your contention that anybody here thinks nobody has ever been prosecuted for falsifying documents and gaining money from fraud?

    It's not more reasonable to try to understand the actual claims being made? Just dunk on an obviously absurd claim that one would have to be a moron to believe?

    I was just replying to this request:

    fecf42a3-34b3-4750-96bb-043748daed77-image.png

    We're all better than that here

    Speak for yourself! I am certainly not above a literal reply.

    So, "such type" can be interpreted broadly enough to make the claim imbecilic, or spefically enough to make it reasonably open to question.

    The broad interpretation would be that this "type" of prosecution was over false documents and fraud.

    A more specific interpretation might be loan paperwork with misrepresented property values from long ago, for a loan which was granted and subsequently repaid with all appropriate interest.

    Education is extremely important.

    1 Reply Last reply
    • 89th8 89th

      @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

      Again, how many times in NY has someone been prosecuted for fraud in a long-concluded business venture where everyone profited? How many New Yorkers have been the target of prosecutions like this that were brought to them by journalists whose singular goal was to harm those being investigated? How many DAs have run on the promise of prosecuting a named individual?

      I am totally with you on this. I really am.

      That being said, I do not have a problem if someone committed fraud years ago, profited hundreds of millions of dollars from it, and later were exposed and fined. Could be Biden. Could be my neighbor. It was so blatantly illegal and fraudulent. If exposed, so be it. Don't to the crime if you can't afford the fine.

      MikM Offline
      MikM Offline
      Mik
      wrote on last edited by
      #55

      @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

      @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

      Again, how many times in NY has someone been prosecuted for fraud in a long-concluded business venture where everyone profited? How many New Yorkers have been the target of prosecutions like this that were brought to them by journalists whose singular goal was to harm those being investigated? How many DAs have run on the promise of prosecuting a named individual?

      I am totally with you on this. I really am.

      That being said, I do not have a problem if someone committed fraud years ago, profited hundreds of millions of dollars from it, and later were exposed and fined. Could be Biden. Could be my neighbor. It was so blatantly illegal and fraudulent. If exposed, so be it. Don't to the crime if you can't afford the fine.

      But it wasn't anybody. It was a specifically targeted individual simply because some folks don't like him and will do anything to harm him.

      "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

      JollyJ 89th8 2 Replies Last reply
      • 89th8 89th

        @Horace said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

        @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

        The question was whether anyone besides Trump has been tried in NY for falsifying business documents and gaining money from the fraud.

        So, it's your contention that anybody here thinks nobody has ever been prosecuted for falsifying documents and gaining money from fraud?

        It's not more reasonable to try to understand the actual claims being made? Just dunk on an obviously absurd claim that one would have to be a moron to believe?

        I was just replying to this request:

        fecf42a3-34b3-4750-96bb-043748daed77-image.png

        We're all better than that here

        Speak for yourself! I am certainly not above a literal reply.

        JollyJ Offline
        JollyJ Offline
        Jolly
        wrote on last edited by
        #56

        @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

        @Horace said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

        @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

        The question was whether anyone besides Trump has been tried in NY for falsifying business documents and gaining money from the fraud.

        So, it's your contention that anybody here thinks nobody has ever been prosecuted for falsifying documents and gaining money from fraud?

        It's not more reasonable to try to understand the actual claims being made? Just dunk on an obviously absurd claim that one would have to be a moron to believe?

        I was just replying to this request:

        fecf42a3-34b3-4750-96bb-043748daed77-image.png

        We're all better than that here

        Speak for yourself! I am certainly not above a literal reply.

        You still haven't given me one. None of those prosecutions are similar to Trump's.

        “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

        Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

        1 Reply Last reply
        • MikM Mik

          @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

          @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

          Again, how many times in NY has someone been prosecuted for fraud in a long-concluded business venture where everyone profited? How many New Yorkers have been the target of prosecutions like this that were brought to them by journalists whose singular goal was to harm those being investigated? How many DAs have run on the promise of prosecuting a named individual?

          I am totally with you on this. I really am.

          That being said, I do not have a problem if someone committed fraud years ago, profited hundreds of millions of dollars from it, and later were exposed and fined. Could be Biden. Could be my neighbor. It was so blatantly illegal and fraudulent. If exposed, so be it. Don't to the crime if you can't afford the fine.

          But it wasn't anybody. It was a specifically targeted individual simply because some folks don't like him and will do anything to harm him.

          JollyJ Offline
          JollyJ Offline
          Jolly
          wrote on last edited by
          #57

          @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

          @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

          @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

          Again, how many times in NY has someone been prosecuted for fraud in a long-concluded business venture where everyone profited? How many New Yorkers have been the target of prosecutions like this that were brought to them by journalists whose singular goal was to harm those being investigated? How many DAs have run on the promise of prosecuting a named individual?

          I am totally with you on this. I really am.

          That being said, I do not have a problem if someone committed fraud years ago, profited hundreds of millions of dollars from it, and later were exposed and fined. Could be Biden. Could be my neighbor. It was so blatantly illegal and fraudulent. If exposed, so be it. Don't to the crime if you can't afford the fine.

          But it wasn't anybody. It was a specifically targeted individual simply because some folks don't like him and will do anything to harm him.

          A politician who ran on a platform of targeting a single person.

          “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

          Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

          1 Reply Last reply
          • MikM Offline
            MikM Offline
            Mik
            wrote on last edited by
            #58

            Yeah, I asked about that above. And the Dems want to talk about threat to democracy. Spare me.

            "The intelligent man who is proud of his intelligence is like the condemned man who is proud of his large cell." Simone Weil

            89th8 1 Reply Last reply
            • JollyJ Offline
              JollyJ Offline
              Jolly
              wrote on last edited by
              #59

              What the Dems don't seem to learn, is that majorities aren't forever. Revenge shouldn't be a mode of government, but if you screw over the other side well enough...Well, human nature is human nature.

              “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

              Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

              1 Reply Last reply
              • MikM Mik

                @89th said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

                @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

                Again, how many times in NY has someone been prosecuted for fraud in a long-concluded business venture where everyone profited? How many New Yorkers have been the target of prosecutions like this that were brought to them by journalists whose singular goal was to harm those being investigated? How many DAs have run on the promise of prosecuting a named individual?

                I am totally with you on this. I really am.

                That being said, I do not have a problem if someone committed fraud years ago, profited hundreds of millions of dollars from it, and later were exposed and fined. Could be Biden. Could be my neighbor. It was so blatantly illegal and fraudulent. If exposed, so be it. Don't to the crime if you can't afford the fine.

                But it wasn't anybody. It was a specifically targeted individual simply because some folks don't like him and will do anything to harm him.

                89th8 Offline
                89th8 Offline
                89th
                wrote on last edited by
                #60

                @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

                But it wasn't anybody. It was a specifically targeted individual simply because some folks don't like him and will do anything to harm him.

                Which folks, the DA or the journalists who investigated Trump’s business dealings? I can’t speak for the DA but it’s hard not to open a case once the details of the investigative journalism was published.

                Btw I fully admit I have no problem watching Trump get punished for past fraud or crimes, IF they are legit charges, which they seem to be in this case. Refusing to accept your presidential re-election loss is a CARDINAL SIN when it comes to our nation, I don’t care what political party is involved.

                1 Reply Last reply
                • MikM Mik

                  Yeah, I asked about that above. And the Dems want to talk about threat to democracy. Spare me.

                  89th8 Offline
                  89th8 Offline
                  89th
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #61

                  @jolly

                  A politician who ran on a platform of targeting a single person.

                  @Mik said in Trump fine GoFundMe:

                  Yeah, I asked about that above. And the Dems want to talk about threat to democracy. Spare me.

                  Y’all do realize that Trump is doing that too, right?

                  In 2016 he said he would’ve put Hillary in jail.

                  In 2024 he said he would indict Biden.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  • JollyJ Offline
                    JollyJ Offline
                    Jolly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #62

                    Did he?

                    What charges were brought against Hillary?

                    “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                    Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    • JollyJ Offline
                      JollyJ Offline
                      Jolly
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #63

                      And Biden?

                      “Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”

                      Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      • AxtremusA Offline
                        AxtremusA Offline
                        Axtremus
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #64

                        Well, along with “build the wall, and have Mexico pay for it,” “healthcare reform to replace Obamacare,” “cut the deficit,” paying the legal fees for those who punched the protesters at his rallies, etc., you just can’t be sure if he really means it, or even if he does, he simply hasn’t been competent enough to deliver.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • Users
                        • Groups