AI & the female body...
-
A different trend...
Link to video -
Nah. Go back to your chicken porn.
“Cry havoc and let slip the DOGE of war!”
Those who cheered as J-6 American prisoners were locked in solitary for 18 months without trial, now suddenly fight tooth and nail for foreign terrorists’ "due process". — Buck Sexton
-
Brett makes some interesting points:
- That many men find a woman more attractive wearing a nice dress, than the same woman posing in her underwear.
- That unlike the AI pornification of Taylor Swift or other women, this fad is not harmful. Maybe a little goofy, but fun and it's not hurting anybody.
- Women have bought into the myth that overt sexualization is empowering. It's not.
-
Brett makes some interesting points:
- That many men find a woman more attractive wearing a nice dress, than the same woman posing in her underwear.
- That unlike the AI pornification of Taylor Swift or other women, this fad is not harmful. Maybe a little goofy, but fun and it's not hurting anybody.
- Women have bought into the myth that overt sexualization is empowering. It's not.
@Jolly said in AI & the female body...:
Brett makes some interesting points:
- That many men find a woman more attractive wearing a nice dress, than the same woman posing in her underwear.
Years and years ago, before I married, I was walking down the street on a beautiful spring day. A woman was walking toward me, wearing a just-above-the-knee yellow dress. I don't remember the pattern on the dress. But everything about her - the way she walked and carried herself, the "whoosh" of the dress as it moved around her - just screamed "Lovely." Isn't it odd that, decades later, I still remember that?
- That unlike the AI pornification of Taylor Swift or other women, this fad is not harmful. Maybe a little goofy, but fun and it's not hurting anybody.
Maybe, maybe not. There's evidence that porn is harmful to the consumer.
- Women have bought into the myth that overt sexualization is empowering. It's not.
Yup. See my comment to #1. Had she looked at me and said, "Follow me," I would have in a heartbeat.
"Now look here, you Baltic gas passer... " - Mik, 6/14/08
The saying, "Lite is just one damn thing after another," is a gross understatement. The damn things overlap.
-
-
@Jolly said in AI & the female body...:
Brett makes some interesting points:
- That many men find a woman more attractive wearing a nice dress, than the same woman posing in her underwear.
Years and years ago, before I married, I was walking down the street on a beautiful spring day. A woman was walking toward me, wearing a just-above-the-knee yellow dress. I don't remember the pattern on the dress. But everything about her - the way she walked and carried herself, the "whoosh" of the dress as it moved around her - just screamed "Lovely." Isn't it odd that, decades later, I still remember that?
- That unlike the AI pornification of Taylor Swift or other women, this fad is not harmful. Maybe a little goofy, but fun and it's not hurting anybody.
Maybe, maybe not. There's evidence that porn is harmful to the consumer.
- Women have bought into the myth that overt sexualization is empowering. It's not.
Yup. See my comment to #1. Had she looked at me and said, "Follow me," I would have in a heartbeat.
-
Read into it what you will. I don't think they came right out and said that.
But... As happiness and life fulfillment goes, I do think the majority of women would like to be in a good marriage. I also think that the vast majority of married woman would like to have at least one child, whether they work outside of the home or not.
-
@Jolly said in AI & the female body...:
Nah. Go back to your chicken porn.
Quite fitting that whole video is sponsored by getting a free chicken.
@89th said in AI & the female body...:
@Jolly said in AI & the female body...:
Nah. Go back to your chicken porn.
Quite fitting that whole video is sponsored by getting a free chicken.
How did you like the segueway?
-
@Jolly : Well, take this example here. There are many similar photos. The subtext is rather obvious.
-
Of course the girl on the right looks more attractive. That's why the image is so manipulative. It's no accident that she was moved into an "at home taking care of the kid" setting in addition to de-modern-feminism-ize the girl's look.
