Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence
-
@taiwan_girl said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
I think that the US is better than it was 50 years ago, and 25 years ago
Brava!
And I can prove that about the US being better. My new washing machine has this little row of listed phases within the wash cycle, and when each phase is washing, a light goes on below the phase! In bright green! So you always know where the machine is at! If that isn't an improvement in US life, I don't know what is.
@Catseye3 said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
@taiwan_girl said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
I think that the US is better than it was 50 years ago, and 25 years ago
Brava!
And I can prove that about the US being better. My new washing machine has this little row of listed phases within the wash cycle, and when each phase is washing, a light goes on below the phase! In bright green! So you always know where the machine is at! If that isn't an improvement in US life, I don't know what is.
Wait until it breaks and you have to fix it.
-
Thomas Sowell, famous economist who happens to be black, and who just turned 90(!), stated:
" “If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.”
When a black, genius-level IQ who has seen it all over a good part of a century has such concerns, people should listen.
-
Thomas Sowell, famous economist who happens to be black, and who just turned 90(!), stated:
" “If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.”
When a black, genius-level IQ who has seen it all over a good part of a century has such concerns, people should listen.
@Rainman Boy howdy. He's written quite a lot, Rainman. Including this: Basic Economics: A citizen's guide to economics, written for those who want to understand how the economy works but have no interest in jargon or equations. Sowell explains the general principles underlying different economic systems: capitalist, socialist, feudal, and so on. In readable language, he shows how to critique economic policies in terms of the incentives they create, rather than the goals they proclaim. . . . This is the first book for anyone who wishes to understand how the economy functions."
More of his books here: https://www.amazon.com/s?k=thomas+sowell&i=stripbooks&ref=nb_sb_noss_1
-
Thomas Sowell, famous economist who happens to be black, and who just turned 90(!), stated:
" “If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.”
When a black, genius-level IQ who has seen it all over a good part of a century has such concerns, people should listen.
@Rainman said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
Thomas Sowell, famous economist who happens to be black, and who just turned 90(!), stated:
" “If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.”
When a black, genius-level IQ who has seen it all over a good part of a century has such concerns, people should listen.
Hasn't anyone told him to be optimistic, because everything is the same and nothing ever changes?.....
-
@taiwan_girl said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
@Larry said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
TG, I know you may not be feeling it right now, but I do like you and I don't mean to seem like I'm picking on you.
But no matter what is being discussed, your take on it is that there's no difference, everything equals out, nothing changes, etc.. You aren't open to that broad viewpoint might be wrong, even though following your logic to its conclusion, there's no point to anything, nothing anyone does matters, nothing has any effect on anything. And that just won't hold wzter.
Larry, thanks for your comments.
The point I am trying to make is the the US is very good about not letting the "pendulum " swing to far in either direction, and eventually things will "trend" back to the center.
I think the system in the US is such that this will happen.
When President Bush was elected (and re-elected), there were a number of people on the old forum board who thought the world was coming to an end. This was the end of the US for sure!!!!
When President Obama was elected (and re-elected), there were a number of people on this forum who thought that the world was coming to an end. This was the end of the US for sure!!!
When President Trump was elected, there were a number of people who thought that the world was coming to an end. This was the end of the US for sure!!!
I am an optimist and I think that the US is better than it was 50 years ago, and 25 years ago.
Overall quality of life I think is generally better. Of course, there are individual things that people think are worse (gun control, gay marriage, etc) but OVERALL, the quality of life is better.
The "check and balance" in the US does a good job of this. The US did not fall apart when President Bush was elected, nor did it when President Obama was elected, nor did it when President Trump was elected.
If people think that President Trump is moving in a way that the majority disagree with, they will elect Vice President Biden. If that happens, and after four years, the majority are happy with what he is doing, he will be re-elected. If not, the Republic candidate will elected. In either case, i do not think that the US will fall apart, etc.
I just have trouble agreeing that "OMG, the sky will fall" if so and so gets elected/re-elected (regardless of if that is President Trump or Vice President Biden).
You are making an assumption that past performance is indicative of future performance. The fact is, never in our history have we faced a political party openly embracing a Marxist agenda, with a stated goal of tearing down the American way of life and replacing it with a whole different thing.
I understand your reasoning, and can see how you arrived at your opinion. But you a wrong just the same. First off, you are wrong when you say people said the world was ending If ______ gets elected regarding any president prior to Obama. Obama was the first president where that was a common claim about a president. And if you look at the results of him being elected it is completely clear the he IS responsible for setting things in motion to destroy the US. Hell, he even said that was his goal.
I'm happy you're such an optimist. Just don't be blind to reality.
@Larry said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
You are making an assumption that past performance is indicative of future performance.
She has done nothing of the kind. That is your inaccurate interpretation.
She merely points out that there are plenty of examples of past political behavior, patterns, that are worth thinking about when we are speculating upon future possibilities. That's all -- a fairly innocuous observation. And at no point does she say nothing changes.
Your rigid dogmatism -- which never yields a single point -- insists on wrongfully telling her what she said, despite that she, not for the first time, comes back and tries to clarify her meaning.
-
@Larry said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
You are making an assumption that past performance is indicative of future performance.
She has done nothing of the kind. That is your inaccurate interpretation.
She merely points out that there are plenty of examples of past political behavior, patterns, that are worth thinking about when we are speculating upon future possibilities. That's all -- a fairly innocuous observation. And at no point does she say nothing changes.
Your rigid dogmatism -- which never yields a single point -- insists on wrongfully telling her what she said, despite that she, not for the first time, comes back and tries to clarify her meaning.
@Catseye3 said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
@Larry said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
You are making an assumption that past performance is indicative of future performance.
She has done nothing of the kind. That is your inaccurate interpretation.
She merely points out that there are plenty of examples of past political behavior, patterns, that are worth thinking about when we are speculating upon future possibilities. That's all -- a fairly innocuous observation. And at no point does she say nothing changes.
Your rigid dogmatism -- which never yields a single point -- insists on wrongfully telling her what she said, despite that she, not for the first time, comes back and tries to clarify her meaning.
- Yes she has.
- No she hasn't, she has done just the opposite. She has called what I've said just plain false, and refused to move off her position that everything equals out, nothing changes. That is what is false.
- One doesn't have to make the literal statement "nothing changes" when everything you do say is based on the argument that nothing changes.
- I'm not dogmatic, if you even know what the word means. And I have yielded quite a few points. You even agreed with this point that you're accusing me of being dogmatic about when Thomas So well made the same fucking point in another thread.
- You can't find your own ass anyway, and never could. So get off mine.
-
Well, there's the No Surprises Here Post of the Year. I figured you'd come back just as you did. I had no hope of eliciting a change from you; I was defending TG, whose own graciousness probably does not permit her to realize that you don't play fair.
So let me get this straight. You're miffed because she refuses to move off her position? As you are so fond of saying, BWAAA-HA-HA-HA!
Success is measured by your discipline and inner peace. – Mike Ditka
-
Thomas Sowell, famous economist who happens to be black, and who just turned 90(!), stated:
" “If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.”
When a black, genius-level IQ who has seen it all over a good part of a century has such concerns, people should listen.
@Rainman said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
If the election goes to [Joe] Biden, there’s a good chance that the Democrats will control [Congress] and considering the kinds of things that they’re proposing, that could well be the point of no return for this country.
Where is that quote from, Rainman?
-
Well, there's the No Surprises Here Post of the Year. I figured you'd come back just as you did. I had no hope of eliciting a change from you; I was defending TG, whose own graciousness probably does not permit her to realize that you don't play fair.
So let me get this straight. You're miffed because she refuses to move off her position? As you are so fond of saying, BWAAA-HA-HA-HA!
@Catseye3 said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
Well, there's the No Surprises Here Post of the Year. I figured you'd come back just as you did. I had no hope of eliciting a change from you; I was defending TG, whose own graciousness probably does not permit her to realize that you don't play fair.
So let me get this straight. You're miffed because she refuses to move off her position? As you are so fond of saying, BWAAA-HA-HA-HA!
You don't need to defend TG from me. She and I have known each other and been friends a lot longer than you've been around to play Karen. So here's what you do - go make me a sammich, and get back to your laundry.
-
Ease up there, partner.
“I am fond of pigs. Dogs look up to us. Cats look down on us. Pigs treat us as equals.” ~Winston S. Churchill
-
-
@George-K said in Trump commutes Roger Stone’s sentence:
https://www.nationalreview.com/2020/07/an-indefensible-commutation/
Color me surprised that National Review opposed the commutation.
